Dynamic Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Development for Product and Process Design Teams

References

• Adler PS (1995) Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. 6(2):147–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer in organizations: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Dec. Proc. 82:150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan VV, Lin S (2013) Team dispersion, information technology, and project performance. Production Oper. Management 22:1478–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan M, Gerwin D, Thomson V (2004) Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement. Management Sci. 50(12):1690–1703.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2000) Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Sci. 46(2):265–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2004) Managing knowledge-based resource capabilities under uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(11):1504–1518.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Franza RM (2006) Investing in product development and production capabilities: The crucial linkage between time-to-market and ramp-up time. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171(2):536–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao R, Kavadias S, Gaimon C (2009) Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives, and new product development portfolio management. Management Sci. 55(9):1556–1569.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Raynor ME (2003) Creating a killer product. Forbes 172:82–84.Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Eliashberg J, Ho T-H (2000) An analysis of several new product performance metrics. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):337–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA (2010) Staying Power: Six Enduring Principles for Managing Strategy and Innovation in an Uncertain World (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• DeTar J (1997) K6 chief Vinod Dham leaving AMD. Electronic News 43(2195):20.Google Scholar
• Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK, Marion TJ (2012) Back-loading: A potential side effect of employing digital design tools in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Management 29(S1):140–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C (1997) Planning information technology—Knowledge worker systems. Management Sci. 43(9):1308–1328.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C, Ozkan GF, Napoleon K (2011) Dynamic resource capabilities: Managing workforce knowledge with a technology upgrade. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1560–1578.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Porteus EL (1995) Optimal timing for reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. 41(9):1431–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedlund G (1994) A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):73–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE (1997) A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. 43(4):437–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Lapre MA, van Wassenhove LN (2001) Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Sci. 47(10):1311–1325.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin J, Chai KH, Wong YS, Brombacher AC (2008) A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development. Eur. J. Oper. 185(1):378–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C (1998) Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. 44(8):1032–1048.Link, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C (2005) Rush and be wrong or wait and be late? A model of information in collaborative processes. Production Oper. Management 14(3):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT (2006) Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 52(6):826–843.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J (2010) Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Management Sci. 56(8):1324–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Cui Z (2010) Decision making in multifunctional teams: The strategic impact of a forgotten dimension. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Huchzermeier A (2003) Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 49(6):733–750.Link, Google Scholar
• Morrison G, DeTar J (1998) Multimedia will drive the 1998 market. Electronic News 44(2200):16–22.Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Peltokorpi V (2006) Knowledge-based view of radical innovation: Toyota Prius case. Hage JT, Meenus M, eds. Innovation and Knowledge Growth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 88–104.Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Toyama R, Hirata T (2008) Managing Flow: A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1997) The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Roemer TA, Ahmadi RH (2004) Concurrent crashing and overlapping in product development. Oper. Res. 52(4):606–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Sethi SP, Thompson GL (2000) Optimal Control Theory Applications to Management Science and Economics, 2nd ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Slater M (1996) The microprocessor today. Micro IEEE 16(6):32–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Brunner DJ, Upton DM (2011) Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider. J. Oper. Management 29(5):376–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takahashi D (1997) Intel plans deeper price cuts on chips in an effort to ward off competitors. Wall Street Journal (April 11) B2.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH (1999) Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. 45(4):455–465.Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2004) The copy-exactly ramp-up strategy: Trading-off learning with process change. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 51(1):70–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH, De Meyer A (2002) Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. 13(4):402–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH, Fujimoto T (2000) The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. J. Production Innovation Management 17:128–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilin A (2005) The smartest company of the year: And the winner is… Toyota hot cars. Business 2.0 6:65–66.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide to Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber A (2006) The hybrid challenge. Assembly Magazine (June 1), http://www.assemblymag.com/articles/84379-the-hybrid-challenge.Google Scholar
• Willcox JK (1999) Chip makers geared up for year-end battle. TWICE 14(21):36.Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1996) AMD renews Intel battle with K6 CPU. Electronic Engrg. Times 11:4.Google Scholar
• Xiao W (2012) Essays on knowledge management, Ph.D. dissertation, Scheller College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Yao T, Lu T, Zhang B (2014) An overlapping-based design structure matrix for measuring interaction strength and clustering analysis in product development project. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 61(1):159–170.Crossref, Google Scholar