Bundled Procurement for Technology Acquisition and Future Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2014.0517

References

  • Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beil DR, Wein LM (2003) An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. 49(11):1529–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bradsher K (2006) Blessed by a U.S. official, China will buy 4 nuclear reactors. New York Times (December 18), http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/business/worldbusiness/18nuclear.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Export Administration (1999) U.S. commercial technology transfers to the People’s Republic of China. Defense Market Research report, Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Cachon G, Zhang F (2006) Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. 52(6):881–896.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F (2007) Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. 53(10):1562–1576.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen RR, Roundy RO, Zhang RQ, Janakiraman G (2005) Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement. Management Sci. 51(3):467–482.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chu LY (2009) Truthful bundle/multiunit double auctions. Management Sci. 55(7):1184–1198.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2008) The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy 36(4):1273–1283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby WJ (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):350–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E (2006) E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Sci. 52(4):581–596.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Haruvy E, Katok E (2007) A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 26(5):629–641.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fess E, Hoeck M, Lorz MO (2009) International technology transfers and competition. Rev. Internat. Econom. 17(5):1038–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallini NT (1984) Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(5):931–941.Google Scholar
  • Gallini NT, Winter R (1985) Licensing in the theory of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(2):514–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallini NT, Wright BD (1990) Technology transfer under asymmetric information. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hout TM, Ghemawat P (2010) China vs. the world: Whose technology is it? Harvard Bus. Rev. (December):95–103.Google Scholar
  • Huh WT, Park KS (2010) A sequential auction-bargaining procurement model. Naval Res. Logist. 57(1):13–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kabiraj T, Marjit S (1993) International technology transfer under potential threat of entry—A Cournot-Nash framework. J. Development Econom. 42(1):75–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) On the licensing of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 16(4):504–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kostamis D, Beil DR, Duenyas I (2009) Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers’ cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. 55(12):1985–1999.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V (2002) Auction Theory (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • La Manna MMA (1993) Asymmetric oligopoly and technology transfers. Econom. J. 103(417):436–443.Google Scholar
  • Marjit S, Mukherjee A (1998) Technology collaboration and foreign equity participation: A theoretical analysis. Rev. Internat. Econom. 6(1):142–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGee JS (1966) Patent exploitation: Some economic and legal problems. J. Law Econom. 9:135–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M, Bassok Y (2008) A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. 54(8):1482–1496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D, Kalagnanam J (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):435–451.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockett K (1990) Choosing the competition and patent licensing. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):161–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C (1985) Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):25–30.Google Scholar
  • Shepard A (1987) Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies. RAND J. Econom. 18(3):360–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shirouzu N (2010) Train makers rail against China’s high-speed designs. Wall Street Journal (November 18) A1.Google Scholar
  • Tam KY, Hui KL (2001) A choice model for the selection of computer vendors and its empirical estimation. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(4):97–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Rhee B, Verma R, Plaschka G (2009) Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support. Int. J. Production Econom. 120(1):30–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verma R, Pullman ME (1998) An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega, Internat. J. Management Sci. 26(6):739–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wan Z, Beil DR (2014) Bid-taker power and supply base diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):300–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watt DJ, Kayis B, Willey K (2010) The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. Internat. J. Project Management 28(1):51–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong G (2012) China ends nuke plant ban set after Japan disaster. Yahoo! Finance (October 24), http://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-ends-nuke-plant-ban-005125687.html.Google Scholar
  • Youngman R, Schmidt J, Lee J, de Coninck H (2007) Evaluating technology transfer in the clean development mechanism and joint implementation. Climate Policy 7(6):488–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Zhang X, Wang Y (2008) The procurement mechanism for the Three Gorges hydropower generation equipment. Qin Z, Han J, eds. Management Science and Engineering in China’s Development 2008, Vol. II (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press, Shanghai, China), 1777–1782. [Original article in Chinese.] Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.