Bundled Procurement for Technology Acquisition and Future Competition
Published Online:27 Feb 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2014.0517
References
- (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. 49(11):1529–1545.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Blessed by a U.S. official, China will buy 4 nuclear reactors. New York Times (December 18), http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/business/worldbusiness/18nuclear.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Export Administration (1999) U.S. commercial technology transfers to the People’s Republic of China. Defense Market Research report, Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2006) Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. 52(6):881–896.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. 53(10):1562–1576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement. Management Sci. 51(3):467–482.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Truthful bundle/multiunit double auctions. Management Sci. 55(7):1184–1198.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy 36(4):1273–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):350–371.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Sci. 52(4):581–596.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 26(5):629–641.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) International technology transfers and competition. Rev. Internat. Econom. 17(5):1038–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(5):931–941.Google Scholar
- (1985) Licensing in the theory of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(2):514–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Technology transfer under asymmetric information. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) China vs. the world: Whose technology is it? Harvard Bus. Rev. (December):95–103.Google Scholar
- (2010) A sequential auction-bargaining procurement model. Naval Res. Logist. 57(1):13–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) International technology transfer under potential threat of entry—A Cournot-Nash framework. J. Development Econom. 42(1):75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) On the licensing of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 16(4):504–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers’ cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. 55(12):1985–1999.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Auction Theory (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
- (1993) Asymmetric oligopoly and technology transfers. Econom. J. 103(417):436–443.Google Scholar
- (1998) Technology collaboration and foreign equity participation: A theoretical analysis. Rev. Internat. Econom. 6(1):142–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1966) Patent exploitation: Some economic and legal problems. J. Law Econom. 9:135–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. 54(8):1482–1496.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):435–451.Link, Google Scholar
- (1990) Choosing the competition and patent licensing. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):161–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):25–30.Google Scholar
- (1987) Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies. RAND J. Econom. 18(3):360–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Train makers rail against China’s high-speed designs. Wall Street Journal (November 18) A1.Google Scholar
- (2001) A choice model for the selection of computer vendors and its empirical estimation. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(4):97–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support. Int. J. Production Econom. 120(1):30–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega, Internat. J. Management Sci. 26(6):739–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Bid-taker power and supply base diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):300–314.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria. Internat. J. Project Management 28(1):51–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) China ends nuke plant ban set after Japan disaster. Yahoo! Finance (October 24), http://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-ends-nuke-plant-ban-005125687.html.Google Scholar
- (2007) Evaluating technology transfer in the clean development mechanism and joint implementation. Climate Policy 7(6):488–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The procurement mechanism for the Three Gorges hydropower generation equipment. Qin Z, Han J, eds. Management Science and Engineering in China’s Development 2008, Vol. II (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press, Shanghai, China), 1777–1782. [Original article in Chinese.] Google Scholar

