Pricing and Production Flexibility: An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Industry
Published Online:15 May 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0534
References
- (2002) Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) 1,000 cash back: The pass-through of auto manufacturer promotions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1253–1270.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Drivers of finished-goods inventory in the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. 56(1):202.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Matching Supply with Demand, Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, Singapore).Google Scholar
- (2013) Dynamic pricing of substitutable products in the presence of capacity flexibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):86–101.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Resource flexibility with responsive pricing. Oper. Res. 53(3):532–548.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Sci. 36(4):449–466.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The impact of new product introduction on plant productivity in the North American automotive industry. Management Sci. 59(10):2217–2236.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. 53(2):192–207.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Deployment of manufacturing flexibility: An empirical analysis of the North American automotive industry. Working paper, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2077659.Google Scholar
- (2009) Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications, Vol. 12 (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (1978) Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46(4):931–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Does focus improve operational performance? Lessons from the management of clinical trials. Strategic Management J. 29(2):173–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. 41(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The effects of focus on performance: Evidence from California hospitals. Management Sci. 57(11):1897–1912.Link, Google Scholar
- (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, No. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The effects of product line breadth: Evidence from the automotive industry. Working paper, available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241384.Google Scholar
- (2009) Competing retailers and inventory: An empirical investigation of General Motors’ dealerships in isolated U.S. markets. Management Sci. 55(9):1586–1604.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Manufacturing flexibility: Measures and relationships. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 118(3):429–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Causal inference using potential outcomes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100(469):322–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems 2(4):289–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- StataCorp (2013) Stata Treatment-Effects Reference Manual: Potential Outcomes/Counterfactual Outcomes (StataCorp, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
- (2008) Operations Strategy: Principles and Practice (Dynamic Ideas, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
- (1999) Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Sci. 45(12):1631–1649.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

