OM Forum—Making OM Research More Relevant: “Why?” and “How?”
Published Online:12 Aug 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0553
References
- (1980) Research in operations management. J. Oper. Management 1(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) What is interesting in operations management? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):166–169.Link, Google Scholar
- de Kok AG, Graves S, eds. (2003) Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operations, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- (2013) Sustainable operations management: An enduring stream or a passing fancy? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):689–700.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Strengthening the empirical base of operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):368–382.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The vital role of operations analysis in improving healthcare delivery. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(4):488–494.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. 41(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) The service and information economy: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):136–141.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) How we can improve our profession. Presentation at the INFORMS Annual Conference, San Francisco, November 9, 2014.Google Scholar
- (2002) The end of business schools? Acad. Management Learning Ed. 1(1):78–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economic journals. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):483–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) OM research: From problem-driven to data-driven research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(1): 2–10.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Opportunities for developing the science of operations and supply chain management. J. Oper. Management 30(3): 245–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) POMS initiative for promoting practice-driven research and research-influenced practice. Production Oper. Management 23(5):725–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The OR/MS ecosystem: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Oper. Res. 56(2):267–277.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014a) Guiding the next generation of doctoral students in operations management. Internat. J. Production Econom. 150(April):28–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014b) Supply chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production Oper. Management 23(9):1483–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Introduction to the special issue on humanitarian operations and crisis management. Production Oper. Management 23(6):925–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The past, present, and future of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):1–3.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Will video kill the classroom star? The threat and opportunity of massively open online courses for full-time MBA programs. Working paper, Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2013) 3Rs of operations management: Research, relevance and rewards. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):2–5.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Complex problems with multiple stakeholders: How to bridge the gap between reality and OR/MS? J. Bus. Econom. 83(1):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Business research needs to be more relevant for managers. Financial Times (February 14), http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/f42b4028-35fb-11e0-b67c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3hUkdcJQt.Google Scholar

