The Limits of Planned Obsolescence for Conspicuous Durable Goods

References

• Agrawal V, Ülkü S (2013) The role of modular upgradability as a green design strategy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):640–648.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005a) Conspicuous Consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005b) Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2008) Research note—Trading up: A strategic analysis of reference group effects. Marketing Sci. 27(5):932.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand K, Pac M, Veeraraghavan S (2011) Quality-speed conundrum: Trade-offs in customer-intensive services. Management Sci. 57(1):40–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Arifoğlu K, Deo S, Iravani S (2012) Pricing and strategic rationing when selling to snobbish consumers. Working paper, University College London, London.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell L, Bernheim D (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):349–373.Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Stock A (2009) Limited edition products: When and when not to offer them. Marketing Sci. 28(2):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S, Gilbert S (2009) Implications of channel structure for leasing or selling durable goods. Marketing Sci. 28(5):918–934.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S, Gilbert S (2015) Implications of channel structure and operational mode upon a manufacturer’s durability choice. Production Oper. Management 24(7):1071–1085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BMW (2008) The BMW Maintenance Program. Accessed September 27, 2015, http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Content/bmwmaintenanceprogram.aspx.Google Scholar
• BMW (2012) Ownership benefits: Residual value. Accessed August 15, 2012, http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Content/Owner/ResidualValue.aspx.Google Scholar
• Borenstein D, MacKieMason J, Netz J (1995) Antitrust policy in aftermarkets. Antitrust Law J. 63:455–482.Google Scholar
• Bulow J (1986) An economic theory of planned obsolescence. Quart. J. Econom. 101(4):729–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Swinney R (2009) Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 55(3):497–511.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Feldman P (2011) Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):244–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Chao A, Schor J (1998) Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women’s cosmetics. J. Econom. Psych. 19(1):107–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chayet S, Kouvelis P, Yu D (2011) Product variety and capacity investments in congested production systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):390–403.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Sci. 47(2):250–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Corneo G, Jeanne O (1997) Conspicuous consumption, snobbism, and conformism. J. Public Econom. 66(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo L, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove L (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. 18(1):42–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2009) Planned obsolescence. (May 23), http://www.economist.com/node/13354332.Google Scholar
• Erat S, Bhaskaran S (2012) Consumer mental accounts and implications to selling base products and add-ons. Marketing Sci. 31(5):801–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Goering G (1992) Oligopolies and product durability. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 10(1):55–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heese H, Swaminathan J (2006) Product line design with component commonality and cost-reduction effort. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(2):206–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999a) Adverse selection in durable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1097–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999b) Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J. Econom. 30(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Yang Y, Anderson K (2001) A theory of finitely durable goods monopoly with used-goods market and transaction costs. Management Sci. 47(11):1515–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen C (2010) Even free, your maintenance may vary. New York Times (August 19), http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/automobiles/22FREE.html.Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Kim S, Swinney R (2015) Product quality in a distribution channel with inventory risk. Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Chhajed D (2002) Product design with quality-type attributes. Management Sci. 48(11):1502–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleiman E, Ophir T (1966) The durability of durable goods. Rev. Econom. Stud. 33(2):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O, Kohli R, Montoya R (2011) The design of durable goods. Marketing Sci. 30(1):111–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Zhu W (2006) Designing a family of development-intensive products. Management Sci. 52(6):813.Link, Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, snob and veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand. Quart. J. Econom. 64(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D, Rayport J (1997) Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(6):102–113.Google Scholar
• Levhari D, Srinivasan T (1969) Durability of consumption goods: Competition versus monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):102–107.Google Scholar
• Lynn M (1991) Scarcity effect on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psych. Marketing 8(1):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller E, Peles Y (1990) Optimal dynamic durability. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 14(3):709–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Tang C, eds. (2009) Consumer-driven Demand and Operations Management Models: A Systematic Study of Information-technology-enabled Sales Mechanisms, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 131 (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Taylor T (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. 26(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Nussbaum B (2004) The power of design. BusinessWeek (May 16), http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2004-05-16/the-power-of-design.Google Scholar
• Patek Philippe (2012a) Caring for your watch. Accessed August 15, 2012, http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/caringforyourwatch.html.Google Scholar
• Patek Philippe (2012b) Product advertising. Accessed August 15, 2012, http://www.patek.com/contents/default/en/advertisingcampaign.html.Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W (1995) Design innovation and fashion cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):771–792.Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. 55(3):333–347.Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Wang Q (2013) Implications of hyperbolic discounting for optimal pricing and scheduling of unpleasant services that generate future benefits. Management Sci. 59(8):1927–1946.Link, Google Scholar
• Randhawa R, Kumar S (2008) Usage restriction and subscription services: Operational benefits with rational users. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):429–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R, Schaefer R (2013) Conspicuous consumption and dynamic pricing. Marketing Sci. 32(5):786–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Saleh J (2008) Analyses for Durability and System Design Lifetime: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Shi H, Liu Y, Petruzzi N (2013) Consumer heterogeneity, product quality, and distribution channels. Management Sci. 59(5):1162–1176.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonson I, Nowlis S (2000) The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slade G (2006) Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Snyder C (1992) Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 13(1):9–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder C, Fromkin H (1977) Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. J. Abnormal Psych. 86(5):518–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X (2007) Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Management Sci. 53(5):726–741.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zhang F (2009) On the value of commitment and availability guarantees when selling to strategic consumers. Management Sci. 55(5):713–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Swan P (1970) Durability of consumption goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 60(5):884–894.Google Scholar
• Tereyağoğlu N, Veeraraghavan S (2012) Selling to conspicuous consumers: Pricing, production, and sourcing decisions. Management Sci. 58(12):2168–2189.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S, Von Hippel E (2002) Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(4):74–81.Google Scholar
• Tian WB K, Hunter G (2001) Consumer’s need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. J. Consumer Res. 28(1):50–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich L (2008) Same carriage, fresh horses. New York Times (October 7), http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/automobiles/autosreviews/07BMW-535xi.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=BMW\%20maintenance\%20&st=nyt.Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1996) Durable goods pricing when quality matters. J. Bus. 69(4):489–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (2003) Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worchel S, Lee J, Adewole A (1975) Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 32(5):906–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu X (2009) Optimal price and product quality decisions in a distribution channel. Management Sci. 55(8):1347–1352.Link, Google Scholar