Team Familiarity and Productivity in Cardiac Surgery Operations: The Effect of Dispersion, Bottlenecks, and Task Complexity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0597

References

  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Altuntas S, Baykal U (2010) Relationship between nurses’ organizational trust levels and their organizational citizenship behaviors. J. Nursing Scholarship 42(2):186–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (1982) Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(3):420–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker RD, Field JM, Sinha KK (2001) Work-team implementation and trajectories of manufacturing quality: A longitudinal field study. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(1):25–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berman SL, Down J, Hill CWL (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. 45(1):13–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry Jaeker JA, Tucker A (2016) Past the point of speeding up: The negative effects of workload saturation on efficiency and patient severity. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2387.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bezrukova K, Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA (2007) Group heterogeneity and faultlines: Comparing alignment and dispersion theories of group composition. Behfar KJ, Thompson LL, eds. Conflict in Organizational Groups: New Directions in Theory and Practice (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL), 57–92.Google Scholar
  • Bion WR (1962) Experience in Groups (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Boudreau J, Hopp W, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15(6):633–644.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bushe GR, Chu A (2011) Fluid teams: Solutions to the problems of unstable team membership. Organ. Dynam. 40(3):181–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 13(1):40–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catchpole KR, Giddings AEB, Wilkinson M, Hirst G, Dale T, De Leval MR (2007) Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery 142(1):102–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chillemi O, Gui B (1997) Team human capital and worker mobility. J. Labor Econom. 15(4):567–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JN, Sy T (2010) Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 31(7):1032–1054.Google Scholar
  • Cleves M, Gutierrez RG, Gould W, Marchenko YV (2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  • Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, Aiken LS, West SG (2003) Applied Multiple Regression—Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Cole MS, Bedeian AG, Hirschfeld RR, Vogel B (2011) Dispersion-composition models in multilevel research a data-analytic framework. Organ. Res. Methods 14(4):718–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Lepine JA, Zapata CP, Wild RE (2011) Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: Building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad. Management J. 54(5):999–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook LM (2013) Can nurses trust nurses in recovery reentering the workplace? Nursing 43(3):21–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R, Parker A, Prusak L, Borgatti SP (2001) Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organ. Dynam. 30(2):100–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Mosca CL, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM (2007) Risk-adjusted morbidity in teaching hospitals correlates with reported levels of communication and collaboration on surgical teams but not with scale measures of teamwork climate, safety climate, or working conditions. J. Amer. College Surgeons 205(6):778–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):917–926.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Jong BA, Dirks KT (2012) Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: Implications of asymmetry and dissensus. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):391–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dineen BR, Noe RA, Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Wiethoff C (2007) Level and dispersion of satisfaction in teams: Using foci and social context to explain the satisfaction-absenteeism relationship. Acad. Management J. 50(3):623–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Rev. 41(2):79–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Nembhard IM (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Product Innovation Management 26(2):123–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Winslow AB, Bohmer RMJ, Pisano GP (2003) Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. 34(2):197–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Evans CR, Dion KL (1991) Group cohesion and performance a meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 22(2):175–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman DC (1984) The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1):47–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field JM, Sinha KK (2005) Applying process knowledge for yield variation reduction: A longitudinal field study. Decision Sci. 36(1):159–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming M, Smith S, Slaunwhite J, Sullivan J (2006) Investigating interpersonal competencies of cardiac surgery teams. Canadian J. Surgery 49(1):22–30.Google Scholar
  • Gardner HK, Gino F, Staats BR (2012) Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):998–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawande A (2010) Checklist Manifesto, Vol. 200 (Metropolitan Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittel JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldratt EM, Cox J (1984) The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorschn JW ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
  • Hackman JR (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison DA, Mohammed S, McGrath JE, Florey AT, Vanderstoep SW (2003) Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psych. 56(3):633–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EPet al. (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England J. Medicine 360(5):491–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann DA, Lei Z, Grant AM (2009) Seeking help in the shadow of a doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1261–1274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead AB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA (2000) Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 4(2):143–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2000) Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, Burr Ridge, IL).Google Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Iravani SMR, Liu F (2009) Managing white-collar work: An operations-oriented survey. Production Oper. Management 18(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management 29(6):801–830.Google Scholar
  • Joshi KD, Sarker S, Sarker S (2007) Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems 43(2):322–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R (1982) The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(1):81–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Staats BR (2012) Accumulating a portfolio of experience: The effect of focal and related experience on surgeon performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(4):618–633.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Levine JM, Moreland RL (1999) Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed. Levine JM, Messick DM, Thomson LL, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Psychology Press, New York),267–296.Google Scholar
  • Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liao H, Liu D, Loi R (2010) Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1090–1109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, Reznick R, Baker GR, Doran D, Espin S, Bohnen J, Whyte S (2008) Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch. Surgery 143(1):12–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, Holzmueller CG, Millman EA, Rowen L, Pronovost PJ (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: Teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J. Amer. College Surgeons 202(5):746–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thomson L, Messick D, Levine J, eds. Sharing Knowledge in Organization (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 327–346.Google Scholar
  • Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth CJ (1986) Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psych. Rev. 93(1):23–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paletz SBF, Schunn CD (2011) Assessing group-level participation in fluid teams: Testing a new metric. Behav. Res. Methods 43(2):522–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pullon S (2008) Competence, respect and trust: Key features for successful interprofessional nurse-doctor relationships. J. Interprofessional Care 22(2):133–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schroder H, Driver M, Streuferi S (1967) Human Information Processing (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Roth AV, Balasubramanian S (2008) How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. J. Oper. Management 26(3):426–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR (2012) Unpacking team familiarity: The effects of geographic location and hierarchical role. Production Oper. Management 21(3):619–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL, Edmondson AC (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Rev. 45(2):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig Jr R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. 41(2):322–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen G, Goethals G, eds. Theories of Group Behaviour (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–208.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.