Equivalent Inventory Metrics: A Behavioral Perspective

References

• Alan Y, Gao GP, Gaur V (2014) Does inventory productivity predict future stock returns? A retailing industry perspective. Management Sci. 60(10):2416–2434.Link, Google Scholar
• Alicke K (2016) Personal communication with the authors, phone call on May 13.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ, Harris T, Marschak J (1951) Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica 19(3):250–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Terwiesch C (2013) Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Caplice C, Sheffi Y (1994) A review and evaluation of logistics metrics. Internat. J. Logist. Management 5(2):11–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Frank MZ, Wu OQ (2005) What actually happened to the inventories of American companies between 1981 and 2000? Management Sci. 51(7):1015–1031.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Frank MZ, Wu OQ (2007) U.S. retail and wholesale inventory performance from 1981 to 2004. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):430–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen SA, Kulp S, Randall T (2007) Motivating supply chain behavior: The right incentives can make all the difference. Supply Chain Management Rev. 11(4):18–24.Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Gonzalez C, Sterman JD (2009) Why don’t well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(1):116–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E, Pratt ME (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management J. 32(1):33–54.Google Scholar
• Denes-Raj V, Epstein S (1994) Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(5):819–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckerson WW (2011) Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Epstein S (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Amer. Psychologist 49(8):709–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erlenkotter D (1990) Ford Whitman Harris and the economic order quantity model. Oper. Res. 38(6):937–946.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans JSB (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Rev. Psych. 59(January):255–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer GW, Damodaran N, Laskey KB, Lincoln D (1987) Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Sci. 33(2):198–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green E (2014) Why do Americans stink at math? New York Times Magazine (July 23), http://nyti.ms/1nTvjER.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds. Forschung und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht, Vol. 63 (Göttingen, Germany), 79–93.Google Scholar
• Harris FW (1913) How many parts to make at once. Factory, Magazine Management 10(2):135–136.Google Scholar
• Harrison A, New C (2002) The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance management in achieving competitive advantage: An international survey. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(3):263–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman WH (2003) Supply chain performance metrics. Billington C, Harrison TP, Lee HL, Neale JJ, eds. The Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where Theory and Application Converge. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 62 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 61–73.Google Scholar
• Hoppe EI, Kusterer DJ (2011) Behavioral biases and cognitive reflection. Econom. Lett. 110(2):97–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Yu F, Zhang J, Zhang Y (2003) Medium maximization. J. Consumer Res. 30(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Shu SB, Dellaert BGC, Fox C, Goldstein DG, Häubl G, Larrick RPet al. (2012) Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Lett. 23(2):487–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Kim C, Moser D (1996) Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games Econom. Behav. 13(1):100–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, New York), 49–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Soll JB (2008) The MPG illusion. Science 320(5883):1593–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moritz BB, Hill AV, Donohue KL (2013) Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):72–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moritz BB, Siemsen E, Kremer M (2014) Judgmental forecasting: Cognitive reflection and decision speed. Production Oper. Management 23(7):1146–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Moritz BB (2015) Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1216–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Sci. 61(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Oechssler J, Roider A, Schmitz PW (2009) Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 72(1):147–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmenter D (2010) Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rosenboim M, Shavit T, Cohen C (2013) Do bidders require a monetary premium for cognitive effort in an auction? J. Socio-Econom. 42(February):99–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psych. Bull. 119(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Monaham J, MacGregor DG (2000) Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Human Behav. 24(3):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Keeney RL, Larrick RP (2013) Consumer misunderstanding of credit card use, payments, and debt: Causes and solutions. J. Public Policy Marketing 32(1):66–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23(5):645–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (2002) All models are wrong: Reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynam. Rev. 18(4):501–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svenson O (1970) A functional measurement approach to intuitive estimation as exemplified by estimated time savings. J. Experiment. Psych. 86(2):204–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svenson O (2008) Decisions among time saving options: When intuition is strong and wrong. Acta Psychologica 127(2):501–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (Penguin, London).Google Scholar
• Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE (2011) The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory Cognition 39(7):1275–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psych. Rev. 90(4):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk F, Sonnemans J, van Winden F (2001) Incentive systems in a real effort experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(2):187–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi K (1997) When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 11(6):495–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zipkin PH (2000) Foundations of Inventory Management (McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar