Managing Reliability and Stability Risks in Forest Harvesting

References

• Alonso-Ayuso A, Escudero LF, Guignard M, Quiteros M, Weintraub A (2011) Forestry management under uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 190(1):17–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardon R (2015) Timber sales: A planning guide for landowners. NC cooperative extension resources. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://ncforestry.info/ncces/timber_sales_planning_guide/.Google Scholar
• Barnard CS, Nix JS (1973) Farm Planning and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Baumgras JE, LeDoux CB (1991) Integrating forest growth and harvesting cost models to improve forest management planning. McCormick LH, Gottschalk KW, eds. Proc. 8th Central Hardwood Forest Conf. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA), 120–131.Google Scholar
• Beraldi P, Bruni ME, Violi A (2012) Capital rationing problems under uncertainty and risk. Comput. Optim. Appl. 51(3):1375–1396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjørndal T (1998) Optimal harvesting of farmed fish. Marine Resource Econom. 5(2):139–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjørndal T, Lane DE, Weintraub A (2004) Operational research models and the management of fisheries and aquaculture: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(3):533–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjørndal T, Herrero I, Newman A, Romero C, Weintraub A (2012) Operations research in the natural resource industry. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 19(1–2):39–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boros E, Hammer PL, Ibaraki T, Kogan A (1997) Logical analysis of numerical data. Math. Programming 79(1–3):163–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Chen E (2015) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 61(2):267–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Bullard SH (2001) How to evaluate the financial maturity of timber. Forest Landowner 60(3):36–38.Google Scholar
• Campbell AM, Jones PC (2011) Prepositioning supplies in preparation for disasters. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209(2):156–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chand S, Hsu VN, Sethi S (2002) Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: A classified bibliography. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 4(1):25–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Danielsson J, Embrechts P, Goodhart C, Keating C, Muennich F, Renault O, Shin H-S (2014) Comparing British Columbia with the world. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.naturallywood.com/sites/default/files/documents/resources/comparing-british-columbia-with-the-world-2004.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dunning I, Huchette J, Lubin M (2017) JuMP: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Rev. 59(2):295–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) Trends and status of forest products and services. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.fao.org/docrep/w4345e/w4345e05.htm.Google Scholar
• Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C (2009) Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. Forest Sci. 55(6):512–523.Google Scholar
• Ferreira L, Constantino M, Borges JG (2014) A stochastic approach to optimize maritime pine (pinus pinaster ait.) stand management scheduling under fire risk. An application in Portugal. Ann. Oper. Res. 219(1):359–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finnish Forestry Association (2015) Forest sector is of key importance to Finland. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.smy.fi/en/forest-fi/forest-facts/forest-sector-in-economy/.Google Scholar
• Forest Owners (2015) Tuottoa tuleville sukupolville. Accessed July 28, 2017, https://www.mhy.fi/metsanhoito.Google Scholar
• Forsberg OI (1995) Farming of post-smolt Atlantic salmon (salmo salar l.) in land-based flow-through tanks: Studies of fish growth, metabolic rates, water quality and optimal production strategies 233–251. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Forsell N, Eriksson LO (2014) Influence of temporal aggregation on strategic forest management under risk of wind damage. Ann. Oper. Res. 219(1):397–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortet R (1960) L’algebre de Boole et ses applications en recherche operationnelle. Trabajos estadistica 11(2):111–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann HI (1989) Optimal harvest of a forest in the presence of uncertainty. Canadian J. Forest Res. 19(10):1267–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glen JJ (1987) Mathematical models in farm planning: A survey. Oper. Res. 35(5):641–666.Link, Google Scholar
• González-Araya MC, Soto-Silva WE, Espejo LGA (2015) Harvest planning in apple orchards using an optimization model. Plà-Aragonés LM, ed. Handbook of Operations Research in Agriculture and the Agri-Food Industry (Springer, New York), 79–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A (2015) Forest owners’ socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of customer value: Evidence from Finland. Small-Scale Forestry 14(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaps T (1995) Density dependent growth and the culling of farmed fish. Marine Resource Econom. 10(4):285–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heikkinen V-P (2003) Timber harvesting as a part of the portfolio management: A multiperiod stochastic optimisation approach. Management Sci. 49(1):131–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Henig MI, Weintraub A (2006) A dynamic objective-subjective structure for forest management. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 14(3):55–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschberger P (2005) The effects of FSC-certification in Russia. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj8stW4iK3VAhWBPj4KHdLbAFsQFggmMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.panda.org%2Fdownloads%2Fforests%2Ffscanalysisrussia.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHnlgc9MvctOtSN2y1M8VoR2j3TgQ.Google Scholar
• Innofor (2016) Kaikki alkaa metsäsuunnitelmasta. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.ostammepuuta.fi/metsanhoidon-palvelut/metsasuunnittelu/.Google Scholar
• Jacobson M (2008) To cut or not to cut: Tree value and deciding when to harvest timber. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://extension.psu.edu/natural-resources/forests/finance/forest-tax-info/publications/forest-finance-8-to-cut-or-not-cut-tree-value-and-deciding-when-to-harvest-timber.Google Scholar
• JuliaOpt (2016) Optimization packages for the Julia language. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.juliaopt.org/.Google Scholar
• JuMP (2016) Modeling language for mathematical optimization. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.github.com/JuliaOpt/JuMP.jl.Google Scholar
• Kataoka S (1963) A stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31(1–2):181–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein Haneveld WK (1986) Duality in Stochastic Linear and Dynamic Programming, Vol. 274. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein Haneveld WK, Streutker MH, van der Vlerk MH (2010) An ALM model for pension funds using integrated chance constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 177(1):47–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan A, Lejeune MA (2014) Threshold Boolean form for joint probabilistic constraints with random technology matrix. Math. Programming 147(1):391–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolis K, Hiironen J, Ärölä E, Vitikainen A (2014) Effects of sale-specific factors on stumpage prices in Finland. Silva Fennica 48(3):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krokhmal P, Palmquist J, Uryasev S (2002) Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. J. Risk 2(4):43–68.Google Scholar
• Kurttila M (2016) Personal phone communication, August 25. Acting professor of forest planning, Finnish Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
• Lejeune MA (2012a) Pattern-based modeling and solution of probabilistically constrained optimization problems. Oper. Res. 60(6):1356–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Lejeune MA (2012b) Pattern definition of the p-efficiency concept. Ann. Oper. Res. 200(1):23–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lejeune MA, Margot F (2016) Solving chance constrained problems with random technology matrix and stochastic quadratic inequalities. Oper. Res. 64(4):939–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Lohmander P (2007) Adaptive optimization of forest management in a stochastic world. Weintraub A, Romero C, Bjørndal T, Epstein R, Miranda J, eds. Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources (Springer, New York), 525–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luedtke J (2014) A branch-and-cut decomposition algorithm for solving chance-constrained mathematical programs with finite support. Math. Programming 146(1–2):219–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marques AS, Audy JF, D’Amours S, Rönnqvist M (2014) Tactical and operational harvest planning. Borges JG, Dias-Balteiro L, McDill ME, Rodriguez LCE, eds. The Management of Industrial Forest Plantations: Theoretical Foundations and Applications (Springer, New York), 239–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mosquera J, Henig MI, Weintraub A (2011) Design of insurance contracts using stochastic programming in forestry planning. Ann. Oper. Res. 190(1):117–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naesset E (2004) Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scandinavian J. Forest Res. 19(2):164–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman DH (2002) Forestry’s golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature. J. Forest Econom. 8(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2014) Forest management plans. Accessed July 28, 2017, https://www.ontario.ca/page/forest-management-planning.Google Scholar
• Palma CD, Nelson JD (2009) A robust optimization approach protected harvest scheduling decisions against uncertainty. Canadian J. Forest Res. 39(2):342–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasalodos-Tato M, Mäkinen A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Borges JG, Lämås T, Eriksson LO (2013) Assessing uncertainty and risk in forest planning and decision support systems: Review of classical methods and introduction of innovative approaches. Forest Systems 22(2):282–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Pagnoncelli BK (2014) The optimal harvesting problem under price uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 217(1):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickens JB, Hof JG, Kent BM (1991) Use of chance-constrained programming to account for stochastic variation in the a-matrix of large-scale linear programs: A forestry application. Ann. Oper. Res. 31(1):511–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prékopa A (2003) Probabilistic programming models. Ruszczyński A, Shapiro A, eds. Stochastic Programming: Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 10 (Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam), 267–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Biber P, Ďurský J (2002) The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: Construction, application and evaluation. Forest Ecology Management 152(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pukkala T (1998) Multiple risks in multi-objective forest planning: Integration and importance. Forest Ecology Management 111(2–3):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Kangas J (1996) A method for integrating risk and attitude toward risk into forest planninng. Forest Sci. 42(2):198–205.Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Kellomäki S (2012) Anticipatory vs adaptive optimization of stand management when tree growth and timeber prices are stochastic. Forestry 85(4):463–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rǎdulescu M, Rǎdulescu CZ, Zbǎganu G (2014) A portfolio theory approach to crop planning under environmental constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 219(1):243–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reeves LH, Haight RG (2000) Timber harvest scheduling with price uncertainty using Markowitz portfolio optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 95(1–4):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios I, Weintraub A, Wets RJ-B (2016) Building a stochastic programming model from scratch: A harvesting management example. Quant. Finance 16(2):189–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rönnqvist M (2003) Optimization in forestry. Math. Programming 97(1–2):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rönnqvist M, D’Amours S, Weintraub A, Jofre A, Gunn E, Haight RG, Martell Det al. (2015) Operations research challenges in forestry: 33 open problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 232(1):11–40.Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A (2002) Probabilistic programming with discrete distribution and precedence constrained knapsack polyhedra. Math. Programming 93(2):195–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F (2010) Private forest ownership in Europe. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/SP-26.pdf.Google Scholar
• Snyder LV (2006) Facility location under uncertainty: A review. IIE Trans. 38(7):537–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• StoraEnso (2016) Metsän harvennus milloin ja kuinka paljon? Accessed July 28, 2017, https://www.storaensometsa.fi/metsan-harvennus-milloin-ja-kuinka-paljon/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q %3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0ahUKEwihjPbPja3VAh WLWT4KHWYTADAQFggmMAA%26url%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.storaensometsa.fi%252Fmetsan-harvennus-milloin-ja-kuinka-paljon%252F%26usg%3DAFQjCNHQAmoqdhDMxSi4FTN3yJZEaeiSNg.Google Scholar
• Tahvonen O, Kallio M (2006) Optimal harvesting of forest age classes under price uncertainty and risk aversion. Natural Resources Modeling 19(4):557–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanner MW, Ntaimo L (2010) IIS branch-and-cut for joint chance-constrained stochastic programs and application to optimal vaccine allocation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(1):290–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Union of Agriculture and Forestry Producers in Finland (2016) Apua ja neuvoja puukauppaan. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.mtk.fi/metsa/puumarkkinat/fi_FI/puukauppa/.Google Scholar
• UPM-Kymmene (2016) Wood sourcing and forestry. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.upm.com/Businesses/upm-wood-sourcing-forestry/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar
• U.S. Forest Service (2014) U.S. forest resource facts and historical trends. Accessed July 28, 2017, https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/brochures/docs/2012/ForestFacts_1952-2012_English.pdf.Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service (2014) Forest products. Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.fs.fed.us/research/forest-products.Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Abramovich A (1995) Analysis of uncertainty of future timber yields in forest management. Forest Sci. 41(2):217–234.Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Romero C (2006) Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: A review and comparison. Interfaces 36(5):446–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Vera J (1991) A cutting plane approach for chance constrained linear programs. Oper. Res. 39(5):776–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Wets RJ-B (2014) Harvesting management: Generating wood-prices scenarios. Accessed July 28, 2017, https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~rjbw/mypage/Stochastic_Optimization_files/WntW13.pdf.Google Scholar
• Youssouf A, Toukourou FC (2016) On integrated chance constraints in ALM for pension funds. Working paper, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar