Designing Contracts and Sourcing Channels to Create Shared Value

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0627

References

  • Allen SJ, Schuster EW (2004) Controlling the risk for an agricultural harvest. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(3):225–236.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ang E, Iancu DA, Swinney R (2017) Disruption risk and optimal sourcing in multitier supply networks. Management Sci. 63(8):2397–2419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anupindi R, Sivakumar S (2007) Supply chain reengineering in agri-business. Lee H, Lee C-L, eds. Building Supply Chain Excellence in Emerging Economies (Springer, Boston), 265–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) (2014) Action Plan for Reducing Food Loss and Waste (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Beijng).Google Scholar
  • Ayvaz-Cavdaroglu N, Kazaz B, Webster S (2016) Agricultural cooperative pricing of premium product. Working paper, Kadir Has University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  • Babich V, Aydin G, Brunet P, Keppo J, Saigal R (2012) Risk, financing and the optimal number of suppliers. Mehrotra A, Gurnani H, Ray S, eds. Supply Chain Disruptions: Theory and Practice of Managing Risk (Springer-Verlag, London), 195–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber D (2014) The Third Plate, 1st ed. (Penguin Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  • Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernardo AE, Cai H, Luo J (2001) Capital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard. J. Financial Econom. 61(3):311–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bessiou M, Van Wassenhove LN (2015) Addressing the challenge of modeling for decision-making in socially responsible operations. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1390–1401.Google Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2011) Human resource management and productivity. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1697–1767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Robert J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2010) Why do firms in developing countries have low productivity? Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 100(2):619–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyabatli O (2015) Supply management in multiproduct firms with fixed proportions technology. Management Sci. 61(12):3013–3031.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • BSR (2011) Maximizing benefits from a sustainable supply chain. Accessed September 5, 2017, https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Maximizing_Benefits_From_A_Sustainable_Supply_Chain.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Burke M (2014) Selling low and buying high: An arbitrage puzzle in Kenyan villages. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  • Cachon G (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, de Kok T, eds. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination, and Operation. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 227–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casas G (1999) Recomendaciónes y estrategias para compatibilizar el desarrollo productivo en la Patagonia con la prevención y el control de la desertificasión. [Recommendations and strategies to compatibilize productive development and desertification control in Patagonia.] Technical report, DHV Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ciarallo R, Akella F, Morton T (1994) A period review, production planning model with uncertainty capacity and uncertain demand—Optimality of extended myopic policies. Management Sci. 40(3):320–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Conley TG, Udry CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):35–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C (2008) Returns to capital in microenterprises: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1329–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A, Yang N (2008) Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Oper. Res. 56(4):916–936.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2011) Global Food Losses and Waste—Extent, Causes and Prevention (FAO, Rome).Google Scholar
  • Foster A, Rosenzweig M (2010) Microeconomics of technology adoption. Annual Rev. Econom. 2(1):395–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gereffi G (2001) Shifting governance structures in global commodity chains, with special reference to the internet. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 44(10):1616–1637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunther M (2013) Patagonia seeks more sustainable wool in Patagonia. Accessed October 5, 2017, https://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2013/02/11/patagonia-sustainable-wool.Google Scholar
  • Gupta S, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Sarkar A (2017) Distressed selling by farmers: Model, analysis, and use in policy-making. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print June 22, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12726.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heilmann W-R, Schroter KJ (1991) Orderings of risks and their actuarial applications. Mosler K, Scarsini M, eds. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series, Vol. 19 (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA), 157–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heinemann F, Nagel R, Ockenfels P (2009) Measuring strategic uncertainty in coordination games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):181–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henson S, Masakure O, Cranfield J (2011) Do fresh produce exporters in sub-Saharan Africa benefit from Globalgap certification? World Development 39(9):375–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hohn MI (2010) Literature review on supply chain contracts. Hohn M, ed. Relational Supply Contracts (Springer, London),19–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huh WT, Lall U (2013) Optimal crop choice, irrigation allocation, and the impact of contract farming. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1126–1143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang W, Bakshi N, DeMiguel V (2015) Simple contracts for reliable supply: Capacity versus yield uncertainty. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012)Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MDet al.., eds. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Jelsma I, Giller K, Fairhurst T (2009) Smallholder Oil Palm Production Systems in Indonesia: Lessons Learned from the Nesp Ophir Project (Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Karlan D, Osei R, Osei-Akoto I, Udry C (2014) Agricultural decisions after relaxing credit and risk constraints. Quart. J. Econom. 129(2):597–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazaz B, Webster S (2011) The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):404–417.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keser C, Suleymanova I, Wey C (2012) Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(3–4):262–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y (1996) Equilibrium selection in n-person coordination games. Games Econom. Behav. 15(2):203–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E, Oyer P (2012) Personnel economics. Gibbons R, Robert J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li C (2013) Sourcing for supplier effort and competition: Design of the supply base and pricing mechanism. Management Sci. 59(6):1389–1406.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke RM (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • London T, Anupindi R, Sheth S (2010) Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. J. Bus. Res. 63(6):582–594.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maertens M, Swinnen JFM (2009) Trade, standards, and poverty: Evidence from Senegal. World Development 37(1):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzonia E, Vazquez M (2010) Desertification in patagonia. Latrubesse E, ed. Development in Earth Surface Processes, Vol. 13 (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam), 351–377.Google Scholar
  • McAuley W (2013) Sustainable harvest partnering with Stanford’s d.school. (February 19), http://www.sustainableharvest.com/blog/partnering-with-stanfords-d-school.Google Scholar
  • Mu L, Dawande M, Geng X, Mookerjee V (2016) Milking the quality test: Improving the milk supply chain under competing collection intermediaries. Management Sci. 62(5):1259–1277.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • National Coffee Association (NCA) (2016) 10 steps from seed to cup. Accessed October 5, 2017, http://www.ncausa.org/About-Coffee/10-Steps-from-Seed-to-Cup.Google Scholar
  • Nestlé (2014) Nestlé in Society: Creating Shared Value and Meeting Our Commitments 2014 (Nestlé, Vevey, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(1–2):62–77.Google Scholar
  • Potts J, Lynch M, Wilkings A, Huppe G, Cunningham M, Voora V (2014) The state of sustainability initiatives review. Technical report, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada, and London.Google Scholar
  • Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2013) The Geography of Transport Systems (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (2007) Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • Sodhi MS (2015) Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource-based view. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1375–1389.Google Scholar
  • Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2014) Supply-chain research opportunities with the poor as suppliers or distributors in developing countries. Production Oper. Management 23(9):1483–1494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun D, Qui H, Bai J, Liu H, Lin G, Rozelle S (2013) Liquidity constraints and postharvest selling behavior: Evidence from China’s maize farmers. Developing Economies 51(3):260–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang SY, Gurnani H, Gupta D (2014) Managing disruption in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability. Production Oper. Management 23(7):1198–1211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. 52(5):639–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) (2012)Hori Y, Stuhlberger C, Beilstein M, eds. Desertification: A Visual Synthesis (UNCCD Publications, Bonn).Google Scholar
  • Wal-Mart (2010) Aid for trade facilitation case study: Walmart’s direct farm program. Accessed October 5, 2015, https://www.oecd.org/aidfortrade/48368733.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Wang H, Wang Y, Delgado MS (2014) The transition to modern agriculture: Contract farming in developing economies. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 96(5):1257–1271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Gilland W, Tomlin B (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):489–510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilcox M (2015) A farm level view on supply chain water risk. National Geographic (June 4), https://voices.nationalgeographic.org/2015/06/04/a-farm-level-view-on-supply-chain-water-risk/.Google Scholar
  • Yano C, Lee H (1995) Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Oper. Res. 43(2):311–334.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.