Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly

References

• Babich V, Li H, Ritchken P, Wang Y (2012) Contracting with asymmetric demand information in supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217(2):333–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron D, Besanko D (1992) Information, control, and organizational structure. J. Econom. Management Strategy 1(2):237–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolandifar E, Feng T, Zhang F (2017) Simple contracts to assure supply under noncontractible capacity and asymmetric cost information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):217–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolandifar E, Kouvelis P, Zhang F (2016) Delegation vs. control in supply chain procurement under competition. Production Oper. Management 25(9):1528–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Beil D, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2014) Split-award auctions for supplier retention. Management Sci. 60(7):1719–1737.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2007) Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. 53(10):1562–1576.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Dawande M, Janakiraman G (2018) Optimal procurement auction under multistage supplier qualification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):566–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Shum S, Xiao W (2012) Should an OEM retain component procurement when the CM produces competing products? Production Oper. Management 21(5):907–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Sappington D (2015) Contracting with private knowledge of production capacity. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(4):752–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Shen Z (2006) Agent competition double-auction mechanism. Management Sci. 52(8):1215–1222.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Shen Z (2008) Truthful double auction mechanisms. Oper. Res. 56(1):102–120.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C, Zhou D, Tang C (2004) Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 50(4):550–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Spulber D (1990) Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy 4(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duenyas I, Hu B, Beil D (2013) Simple auctions for supply contracts. Management Sci. 59(10):2332–2342.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Ru J, Wang Y (2014) Optimal procurement design of an assembly supply chain with information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 23(12):2075–2088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Gal-Or M, Dukes A (2007) Optimal information revelation in procurement schemes. RAND J. Econom. 38(2):400–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerardi D, Yariv L (2008) Costly expertise. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 98(2):187–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerchak Y, Wang Y (2004) Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production Oper. Management 13(1):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2012) Labor activists call on Apple to stop squeezing suppliers. Accessed January 22, 2016, http://www.cnet.com/news/labor-activists-call-on-apple-to-stop-squeezing-suppliers/.Google Scholar
• Gümüs M, Ray S, Gurnani H (2012) Supply-side story: Risks, guarantees, competition, and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 58(9):1694–1714.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Chen W, Dawande M, Janakiraman G (2015) Optimal descending mechanisms for constrained procurement. Production Oper. Management 24(12):1955–1965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holton K (2018) Rolls-Royce and airlines grapple with further Dreamliner engine issues. Accessed June 11, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rolls-royce-hldg-engines/rolls-royce-and-airlines-grapple-with-further-dreamliner-engine-issues-idUSKBN1HK0L6.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2017) Simultaneous vs. sequential crowdsourcing contests. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• IHS (2014) iPhone 6 Plus: $100 costlier for consumers to buy—just $15.50 more expensive for Apple to make. Accessed January 22, 2016, https://technology.ihs.com/511475/iphone-6-plus-100-costlier-for-consumers-to-buyjust-1550-more-expensive-for-apple-to-make.Google Scholar
• Jiang L (2015) Managing supplier competition and sourcing sequence for component manufacturing. Production Oper. Management 24(2):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Wang Y (2010) Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems with price-sensitive and uncertain demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Erhun F (2012) Pricing games and impact of private demand information in decentralized assembly systems. Oper. Res. 60(5):1142–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Kayis E, Erhun F, Plambeck E (2013) Delegation vs. control of component procurement under asymmetric cost information and simple contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):45–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Kong G, Rajagopalan S, Zhang H (2013) Revenue sharing and information leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 59(3):556–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ryan J, Shao L, Sun D (2015) Supply contract design for competing heterogeneous suppliers under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 24(5):791–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Conversations with supply chain managers. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Tirole J (1992) The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal, II: Common values. Econometrica 60(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melumad N, Mookherjee D, Reichelstein S (1995) Hierarchical decentralization of incentive contracts. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):654–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mookherjee D (2006) Decentralization, hierarchies, and incentives: A mechanism design perspective. J. Econom. Literature 44(2):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Norris G (2006) Goodrich tools up for Boeing 787 nacelle work. Accessed June 11, 2018, https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/goodrich-tools-up-for-boeing-787-nacelle-work-208427/.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Raz G (2011) Supply chain sourcing under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 20(1):92–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Segal I (1999) Contracting with externalities. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):337–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR, Katok E (2012) When does it pay to delay supplier qualification? Theory and experiments. Management Sci. 58(11):2057–2075.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Niu B, Guo P (2014) The comparison of two vertical outsourcing structures under push and pull contracts. Production Oper. Management 23(4):610–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter E (2004) Incentives and discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):764–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter E (2006) Optimal incentives for sequential production processes. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):376–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter E (2010) Transparency and incentives among peers. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):504–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Aydın G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. 55(2):192–209.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang F (2006) Competition, cooperation, and information sharing in a two-echelon assembly system. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(3):273–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Kong G, Rajagopalan S (2018) Contract design by service providers with private effort. Management Sci. 64(6):2672–2689.Link, Google Scholar