Carbon Tariffs: Effects in Settings with Technology Choice and Foreign Production Cost Advantage

References

• Babiker M (2005) Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J. Internat. Econom. 65(2):421–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beattie A, Hill K (2009) China joins carbon tax protest. Financial Times (July 3), https://www.ft.com/content/76f0e4b0-67fc-11de-848a-00144feabdc0.Google Scholar
• Bollen J, Koutstaal P, Veenendaal P (2011) Trade and climate change. Technical report, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, Den Haag, Netherlands. Accessed June 21, 2018, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/may/tradoc_147906.pdf.Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting Group (2008) Assessment of the impact of the 2013–2020 ETS proposal on the European cement industry. Project report, Cembureau, Brussels. Accessed June 20, 2018, https://www.oficemen.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/BCG-Assessment_IMPACT-2013-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• Broder JM (2009) Obama opposes trade sanctions in climate bill. New York Times (June 28), http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/us/politics/29climate.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Cement Association of Canada (2015) Re: Discussion paper—BC climate leadership plan, July 2015. August 10, 2015 correspondence to the British Columbia Climate Action Secretariat, https://engage.gov.bc.ca/climateleadership/files/2015/12/063_-Cement-Association-of-Canada.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cement Sustainability Initiative (2009) Development of state-of-the-art techniques in cement manufacturing: Trying to look ahead. Working paper, Cement Sustainability Initiative, Geneva. Accessed June 20, 2018, https://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/technology/Technology%20papers.pdf.Google Scholar
• Condon M, Ignaciuk A (2013) Border carbon adjustment and international trade: A literature review. OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper, Paris. Accessed June 20, 2018, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k3xn25b386c-en.pdf?expires=1529501132&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=79D93CC07014CCF5E1052A392711A390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Court of Justice of the European Union (1998) Judgment of the Court of 2 April 1998. Outokumpu Oy. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Uudenmaan lääninoikeus—Finland. Accessed June 20, 2018, http://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/550a7cb8-5f23-4802-bd2f-015da4b13270/language-en.Google Scholar
• Demailly D, Quirion P (2006) CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU-ETS: Grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy 6(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Maria C, van der Werf E (2008) Carbon leakage revisited: Unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ. Resource Econom. 39(2):55–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake D, Kleindorfer PK, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) HeidelbergCement: Technology choice under emissions regulation. European Case Clearing House Case 610-014-1, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Drake D, Kleindorfer PK, Van Wassenhove LN (2016) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist (2007) Climate change: Green protectionism. (November 15), http://www.economist.com/node/10134052.Google Scholar
• European Cement Research Academy (2009) Technology paper number 31: Post combustion capture using absorption technologies. Cement Sustainability Initiative. Accessed June 20, 2018, http://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/technology/Technology%20papers.pdf.Google Scholar
• European Cement Research Academy (2012) Technical report—ECRA CCS project—Report on Phase III. Accessed June 20, 2018, https://www.ecra-online.org/fileadmin/redaktion/files/pdf/ECRA_Technical_Report_CCS_Phase_III.pdf.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) Glass, ceramic, clay and cement production statistics—NACE Rev. 1.1. Accessed June 20, 2018, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:Glass,_ceramic,_clay_and_cement_production_statistics_-_NACE_Rev._1.1.Google Scholar
• Fowlie M (2009) Incomplete environmental regulation, imperfect competition, and emissions leakage. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 1(2):72–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowlie M, Reguant M, Ryan SP (2016) Market-based emissions regulation and industry dynamics. J. Politcal Econom. 124(1):249–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstone M, Kopits E, Wolverton A (2011) Estimating the social cost of carbon for use in US federal rulemakings: A summary and interpretation. NBER Working Paper No. 16913, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubb M, Neuhoff K (2006) Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: Policy overview. Climate Policy 6(1):7–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes P, Reilly T, Rollo J (2011) Border carbon adjustments and the potential for protectionism. Climate Policy 11(2):883–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme (2008) CO2 capture in the cement industry. Technical study report number 2008/3. Accessed June 20, 2018, http://www.ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2008-3.pdf.Google Scholar
• International Iron and Steel Institute (2007) World steel in figures 2007. Accessed June 21, 2018, https://www.steelonthenet.com/kb/files/World_Steel_in_Figures_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
• İşlegen Ö, Reichelstein SJ (2011) Carbon capture by fossil fuel power plants: An economic analysis. Management Sci. 57(1):21–39.Link, Google Scholar
• İşlegen Ö, Plambeck EL, Taylor T (2016) Variability in emissions cost: Implications for facility location, production and shipping. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, New York), 283–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman P (2009) Climate, trade, Obama. The opinion pages—The conscience of a liberal. New York Times (June 29), http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/climate-trade-obama/comment-page-2/?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Ponssard JP, Walker N (2008) EU emissions trading and the cement sector: A spatial competition analysis. Climate Policy 8(5):467–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popp D, Newell RG, Jaffe AB (2010) Energy, the environment, and technological change. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam),873–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan SP (2012) The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica 80(3):1019–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Plambeck E (2016) Allocating emissions among co-products: Implications for procurement and climate policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):414–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Sustainablefreight.com (2018) Ship type carbon emissions calculator. Accessed June 21, 2018, http://www.sustainablefreight.com.au/tools-and-programs/emission-calculators/ship-type-carbon-emissions-calculator.Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress, House (2009) American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, HR 2454, 111th U.S. Congress, 1st Session.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2011) Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2011. Accessed June 20, 2018, http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1209/ML12090A838.pdf.Google Scholar