Modeling Newsvendor Behavior: A Prospect Theory Approach

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2015) Searching for the reference point. Working paper, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Barberis NC (2013) Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(1):173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron O, Hu M, Najafi-Asadolahi S, Qian Q (2015) Newsvendor selling to loss-averse consumers with stochastic reference points. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):456–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostian A, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor pull-to-center effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):590–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowman D, Minehart D, Rabin M (1999) Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(2): 155–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2000) Prospect Theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Kahneman D, Tversky A, eds. Choices, Values, and Frames (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 288–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi EG, Post T (2011) Loss aversion with a state-dependent reference point. Management Sci. 57(6):1094–1110.Link, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Jain K, Bearden JN, Filipowicz A (2013) Sex, risk and the newsvendor. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):86–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E, Van De Ven J (2008) Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(2):683–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Jank W, Zhang S, Karaesmen IZ (2015) Sales force behavior, pricing information, and pricing decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):495–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Roth AE, Haruvy E, Herzog SM, Hau R, Hertwig R, Stewart T, West R, Lebiere C (2010) A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. J. Behav. Decision Making 23(1):15–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie BGS, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Hasija S, Pinker E, Shumsky RA (2010) OM practice—Work expands to fill the time available: Capacity estimation and staffing under Parkinson’s law. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. Bickel P, Diggle P, Fienberg SE, Gather U, Zeger S, eds. Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hershey JC, Schoemaker PJH (1985) Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Sci. 31(10):1213–1231.Link, Google Scholar
• Herweg F (2013) The expectation-based loss-averse newsvendor. Econom. Lett. 120(3):429–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Käki A, Liesiö J, Salo A, Talluri S (2015) Newsvendor decisions under supply uncertainty. Internat. J. Production Res. 53(5):1544–1560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E (2011) Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models. Foundations Trends Tech., Inform. Oper. Management 5(1):1–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirshner SN, Ovchinnikov A (2019) Heterogeneity of reference effects in the competitive newsvendor problem. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):571–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Köbberling V, Wakker P (2005) An index of loss aversion. J. Econom. Theory 122(1):119–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau N, Bearden JN (2013) Newsvendor demand chasing revisited. Management Sci. 59(5):1245–1249.Link, Google Scholar
• Lau N, Hasija S, Bearden JN (2014) Newsvendor pull-to-center reconsidered. Decision Support Systems 58(February):68–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long X, Nasiry J (2015) Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Sci. 61(12):3009–3012.Link, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M, Shechter S (2014) Prospect theory and the newsvendor problem. Management Sci. 60(4):1057–1062.Link, Google Scholar
• Neilson WS (2002) Comparative risk sensitivity with reference-dependent preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 24(2):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Selten R (2014) Impulse balance in the newsvendor game. Games Econom. Behav. 86(July):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Croson R (2013) Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Sci. 59(11):2502–2517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudi N, Drake D (2014) Observation bias: The impact of demand censoring on newsvendor level and adjustment behavior. Management Sci. 60(5):1334–1345.Link, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Sprenger C (2015) An endowment effect for risk: Experimental tests of stochastic reference points. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1456–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.Link, Google Scholar
• Sugden R (2003) Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. J. Econom. Theory 111(2):172–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis DM (1998) Supermodularity and Complementarity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uppari BS, Hasija S (2017) Modeling newsvendor behavior: A prospect theory approach. Working paper, INSEAD, Singapore.Google Scholar
• van Osch SMC, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM (2006) Exploring the reference point in prospect theory: Gambles for length of life. Medical Decision Making 26(4):338–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P, Tversky A (1993) An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 7(2):147–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenner LM (2015) Expected prices as reference points—Theory and experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 75(April):60–79.Crossref, Google Scholar