The Effects of Ecolabels and Environmental Regulation on Green Product Development

References

• Agrawal VV, Lee D (2016) Responsible sourcing. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, New York),71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amacher GS, Koskela E, Ollikainen M (2004) Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling. J. Environment. Econom. Management 47(2):284–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang SH, Wight A-M (2009) Building intangible resources: The stickiness of reputation. Corporate Reputation Rev. 12(1):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baksi S, Bose P (2007) Credence goods, efficient labelling policies, and regulatory enforcement. Environment. Resource Econom. 37(2): 411–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Khosla I, Sinha KK (1998) Quality and competition. Management Sci. 44(9):1179–1192.Link, Google Scholar
• Blatt B (2014) “Unacceptable ingredients”: How many of the groceries sold at Walmart would be banned by Whole Foods? Slate (February 18), http://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2014/02/whole_foods_and_walmart_how_many_groceries_sold_at_walmart_would_be_banned.html.Google Scholar
• Bottega L, De Freitas J (2009) Public, private and nonprofit regulation for environmental quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):105–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brécard D (2014) Consumer confusion over the profusion of eco-labels: Lessons from a double differentiation model. Resource Energy Econom. 37(August):64–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carey M (2013) The federal rule making process: An overview. Accessed July 9, 2017, https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32240.pdf.Google Scholar
• Carmona M (2011) Eco-labels as signals: The role of credibility and reputation. Innovative Marketing 7(3):116–124.Google Scholar
• Castka P, Corbett CJ (2014) Governance of eco-labels: Expert opinion and media coverage. J. Bus. Ethics 135(2):319–326.Google Scholar
• Charles D (2016) Americans don’t trust scientists’ take on food issues. NPR (December 2), https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/12/02/504034298/americans-dont-trust-scientists-take-on-food-politicians-even-less.Google Scholar
• Chen C (2001) Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Sci. 47(2):250–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi SC (1996) Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel. J. Retailing 72(2):117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connor CO (2014) Watch out Whole Foods? Walmart aims to drive down organic prices with new cheaper line. Forbes (April 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/10/watch-out-whole-foods-walmart-aims-to-drive-down-organic-prices-with-new-cheaper-line/#2fdb4f8e32d2.Google Scholar
• Cooney S (2009) Should eco-labels come from government or third party private organizations? TriplePundit (October 23), http://www.triplepundit.com/2009/10/shoudl-eco-labels-be-government-based-or-third-party-private-organizations/.Google Scholar
• Craig AJ, Blanco EE, Sheffi Y (2011) Competing on environmental quality: A model of product carbon labels. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Crampes C, Hollander A (1995) Duopoly and quality standards. Eur. Econom. Rev. 39(1):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dagnoli J (1991) Consciously green. Advertising Age 62(September):14.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2012) Guides for the use of environmental marketing claims. Accessed July 9, 2017, https://www.ftc.gov/policy/federal-register-notices/guides-use-environmental-marketing-claims-green-guides.Google Scholar
• Fischer C, Lyon TP (2014) Competing environmental labels. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(3):692–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandel S (2015) This is why farmers may revolt against Whole Foods. Fortune (June 12), http://fortune.com/2015/06/12/farmers-whole-foods/.Google Scholar
• Garella PG, Petrakis E (2008) Minimum quality standards and consumer’s information. Econom. Theory 36(2):283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Global Ecolabeling Network (2004) Introduction to ecolabelling. Accessed July 9, 2017, http://www.globalecolabelling.net/assets/Uploads/intro-to-ecolabelling.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gui L, Atasu A, Ergun Ö, Toktay LB (2015) Efficient implementation of collective extended producer responsibility legislation. Management Sci. 62(4):1098–1123.Link, Google Scholar
• Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D (2004) Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc. Inquiry 29(2):307–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo R, Lee HL, Swinney R (2016) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(9):2722–2744.Link, Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (2002) Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Horne RE (2009) Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. Internat. J. Consumer Stud. 33(2):175–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Wassenhove LN (2005) Sustainable operations management. Production Oper. Management 14(4):482–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Raz G (2017) Collaborate or compete: Examining manufacturers’ replacement strategies for a substance of concern. Production Oper. Management 26(9):1646–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Zheng Y, Erhun F (2013) The NGO’s dilemma: How to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):649–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Law Library of Congress (2014) Restrictions on genetically modified organisms. Accessed July 9, 2017, http://www.loc.gov/law/help/restrictions-on-gmos/restrictions-on-gmos.pdf.Google Scholar
• Leire C, Thidell Å (2005) Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases—A review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. J. Cleaner Production 13(10):1061–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim MK, Mak H-Y, Rong Y (2015) Toward mass adoption of electric vehicles: Impact of the range and resale anxieties. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):101–119.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu ZL, Anderson TD, Cruz JM (2012) Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218(3):602–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loureiro ML, Lotade J (2005) Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Econom. 53(1):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyon TP (2013) The pros and cons of voluntary approaches to environmental regulation. Reflections Responsible Regulation Conf., March 1–2, New Orleans, 1–13.Google Scholar
• Michaud C, Llerena D (2011) Green consumer behaviour: An experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products. Bus. Strategy Environment 20(6):408–420.Google Scholar
• Moon W, Florkowski WJ, Brückner B, Schonhof I (2002) Willingness to pay for environmental practices: Implications for eco-labeling. Land Econom. 78(1):88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS, Png IP (1992) Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. 38(3):345–359.Link, Google Scholar
• Motta M (1993) Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. J. Indust. Econom. 41(2):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orsdemir A, Hu B, Deshpande V (2016) Responsible sourcing via vertical integration and supply chain partnership. Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Potoski M (2007) Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: A club theory perspective. Policy Stud. J. 35(4):773–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressman I (1970) A mathematical formulation of the peak-load pricing problem. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 1(2):304–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Sethuraman R, Dhar SK (1995) The introduction and performance of store brands. Management Sci. 41(6):957–978.Link, Google Scholar
• Ronnen U (1991) Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. RAND J. Econom. 22(4):490–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roseliep W (2014) Showdown in the produce aisle: Whole Foods vs. Walmart. WGBH News (October 21), https://www.wgbh.org/news/post/showdown-produce-aisle-whole-foods-vs-walmart.Google Scholar
• Rubin K (2014) California’s revolutionary Green Chemistry Initiative moves forward. Accessed July 9, 2017, http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/california39s-revolutionary-green-chemistry-initiative-moves-forward-52251/.Google Scholar
• Schultz M, Mouritsen J, Gabrielsen G (2001) Sticky reputation: Analyzing a ranking system. Corporate Reputation Rev. 4(1):24–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1976) Product differentiation and welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):407–414.Google Scholar
• Straughan RD, Roberts JA (1999) Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. J. Consumer Marketing 16(6):558–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Key factors in the market for remanufactured products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):315–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Tang CS, Zhou S (2012) Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(3):585–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay VJ, Martins-Filho C (2001) A model of vertical differentiation, brand loyalty, and persuasive advertising. Baye MR, Nelson JP, eds. Advertising and Differentiated Products, Vol. 10 (Elsevier/JAI Press, Amsterdam), 221–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2000) Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):372–391.Link, Google Scholar
• Tully SM, Winer RS (2014) The role of the beneficiary in willingness to pay for socially responsible products: A meta-analysis. J. Retailing 90(2):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Youssef AB, Lahmandi-Ayed R (2008) Eco-labelling, competition and environment: Endogenization of labelling criteria. Environment. Resource Econom. 41(2):133–154.Crossref, Google Scholar