Are Hazardous Substance Rankings Effective? An Empirical Investigation of Information Dissemination About the Relative Hazards of Chemicals and Emissions Reductions

References

• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1994a) Revised priority list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of toxicological profiles. Federal Register 59(39):9486–9487.Google Scholar
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1994b) Status of the superfund substance-specific applied research program. Federal Register 59(47):11434–11441.Google Scholar
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2009) Background and Congressional Mandates. Accessed December 5, 2015, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/about/congress.html.Google Scholar
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2012) Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed December 5, 2015, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHAManual/toc.html.Google Scholar
• Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2014) Support document to the 2013 Priority List of Hazardous Substances. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed December 5, 2015, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/.Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa JA (1998) Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 41(5):556–567.Google Scholar
• Arora S, Cason TN (1995) An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. J. Environ. Econom. Management 28(3):271–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett S (1992) Strategy and the environment. Columbia J. World Bus. 27(3–4):202–208.Google Scholar
• Batabyal AA (1995) Leading issues in domestic environmental regulation: A review essay. Ecological Econom. 12(1):23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beavis B, Dobbs IM (1986) The dynamics of optimal environmental regulation. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 10(3):415–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry MA, Rondinelli DA (1998) Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Acad. Management Executive 12(2):38–50.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Klassen RD (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):5–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Treville S, Antonakis J (2006) Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. J. Oper. Management 24(2):99–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Dowell GWS, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drake DF, Just RL (2016) Ignore, avoid, abandon, and embrace: What drives firm responses to environmental regulation? Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 199–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N, King AA (2014) The judgment of garbage: End-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Sci. 60(7):1812–1828.Link, Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Learn about the toxics release inventory. Accessed May 2, 2016, https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/learn-about-toxics-release-inventory.Google Scholar
• Eroglu C, Hofer C (2011) Lean, leaner, too lean? The inventory-performance link revisited. J. Oper. Management 29(4):356–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Kranz D, Santaló J (2010) When necessity becomes a virtue: The effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(2):453–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE (2004) Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J. Counseling Psych. 51(1):115–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman H, Harten T, Springer J, Randall P, Curran MA, Stone K (1992) Industrial pollution prevention! A critical review. J. Air Waste Management Assoc. 42(5):618–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gormley TA, Matsa DA (2011) Growing out of trouble? Corporate responses to liability risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(8):2781–2821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. 20(4):986–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart SL, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 5(1):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartl RF (1992) Optimal acquisition of pollution control equipment under uncertainty. Management Sci. 38(5):609–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR, Zhang R (2009) The effect of operational slack, diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Management 27(3):233–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2004) To pull or not to pull: What is the question? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):133–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Plambeck E (2017) Managing supplier social and environmental impacts with voluntary vs. mandatory disclosure to investors. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Keiser BE (2003) Our environment, part 3: The science and technology. Searcher 11(2):16–25.Google Scholar
• Kennedy PE (1981) Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(4):801.Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Gaur V, Raman A (2010) Do inventory and gross margin data improve sales forecasts for U.S. public retailers? Management Sci. 56(9):1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA (1995) Innovation from differentiation: Pollution control departments and innovation in the printed circuit industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 42(3):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production Oper. Management 10(3):244–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Klassen RD (2000a) Exploring the linkage between investment in manufacturing and environmental technologies. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 20(2):127–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klassen RD (2000b) Just-in-time manufacturing and pollution prevention generate mutual benefits in the furniture industry. Interfaces 30(3):95–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Klassen RD, Whybark DC (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Management J. 42(6):599–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production Oper. Management 14(1):53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Sustainable operations management. Production Oper. Management 14(4):482–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Erhun F, Carlson RC, Rafinejad D (2013) Replacement decisions for potentially hazardous substances. Production Oper. Management 22(4):958–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Dhawan R (2005) Assessing the resource base of Japanese and U.S. auto producers: A stochastic frontier production function approach. Management Sci. 51(7):1060–1075.Link, Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Ralston DA (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(3):497–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maxwell J, Briscoe F (1997) There’s money in the air: The CFC ban and DuPont’s regulatory strategy. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6(5):276–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W (2011) Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1649–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthulingam S, Corbett CJ, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R, Swink M, Kim SW (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. J. Oper. Management 24(5):440–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program (2002) Nomination summary for pentachlorophenol (N20318). Accessed December 6, 2014, https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/testing/noms/search/summary/nm-n20318.html.Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program (2012) Report on carcinogens (RoC) concept: Pentachlorophenol. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed December 6, 2014, http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/pubhealth/roc/listings/p/pentachlorophenol/summary/index.html.Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program (2014) Monograph on pentachlorophenol and by-products of its synthesis. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed December 6, 2014, https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/thirteenth/monographs_final/pentachlorophenol_508.pdf.Google Scholar
• Nike Inc. (2016) Restricted Substance List. Accessed April 15, 2016, http://www.nikeincchemistry.com/restricted-substance-list/.Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2012) Safety Data Sheets (Mandatory), Regulation 29 C.F.R. Part 1910.1200 (d)(4). Accessed December 5, 2015, https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10103.Google Scholar
• Paul MP, Rigrod P, Borsuk ME (2015) A community-driven intervention in Tuftonboro, New Hampshire, succeeds in altering water testing behavior. J. Environ. Health 78(5):30–39.Google Scholar
• Pearl L (2008) ATSDR publishes latest priority list of hazardous substances. Pesticide Toxic Chemical News 36(20):24.Google Scholar
• Quaker Chemical Corp (2015) Powerful industrial maintenance cleaner without harsh chemicals: Quaker Chemical debuts QUAKER FORMULA® PURE BLUE(TM). PR Newswire (September 10), https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/powerful-industrial-maintenance-cleaner-without-harsh-chemicals-quaker-chemical-debuts-quaker-formula-pure-bluetm-300140823.html.Google Scholar
• Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1157–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinhardt F (1999) Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: Economic rationales for “beyond compliance” behavior. J. Indust. Ecology 3(1):9–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg S (2003) Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. J. Management Stud. 40(7):1783–1802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg S, Pil FK, Maxwell J (2001) Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Production Oper. Management 10(3):228–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Shah R, Ward PT (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Management 25(4):785–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Substitution Support Portal (2015a) Substitution of 2-Methoxyethanol in the production of polymer membranes. Accessed November 20, 2015, http://www.subsport.eu/case-stories/211-en.Google Scholar
• Substitution Support Portal (2015b) Substitution of a degreaser in a cleaning company. Accessed November 20, 2015, http://www.subsport.eu/case-stories/303-en.Google Scholar
• Substitution Support Portal (2015c) Substitution of a naphtha-based solvent in the cleaning of printing rolls. Accessed November 20, 2015, http://www.subsport.eu/case-stories/017-en.Google Scholar
• Toffel MW, Marshall JD (2004) Improving environmental performance assessment: A comparative analysis of weighting methods used to evaluate chemical release inventories. J. Indust. Ecology 8(1–2):143–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2004) Trichlorobenzenes in drinking-water: Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Accessed April 14, 2016, http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/trichloro benzenes.pdf.Google Scholar
• Yusuf YY, Adeleye EO (2002) A comparative study of lean and agile manufacturing with a related survey of current practices in the UK. Internat. J. Production Res. 40(17):4545–4562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (2016) Chlorobenzenes Guidance Sheet. Accessed April 7, 2016, http://www.roadmaptozero.com/fileadmin/layout/media/downloads/en/Chlorobenzenes.pdf.Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Management 22(3):265–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zipkin PH (1991) Does manufacturing need a JIT revolution? Harvard Bus. Rev. 69(January–February):40–50.Google Scholar