R&D Spending: Dynamic or Persistent?

References

• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida H, Hsu P-H, Li D (2013) Less is more: Financial constraints and innovative efficiency. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana‐‐Champaign, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Silverman B (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkali G, Bardhan I, Krishnan V (2008) R&D, information technology, and firm performance: A complementarity model. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios L (2011) The organization of R&D in American corporations: The determinants and consequences. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios L (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atanassov J (2013) Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. J. Finance 68(3):1097–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baard S, Rench T, Kozlowski S (2014) Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. J. Management 40(1):48–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer T, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo D, Tucker J (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J. Appl. Psych. 92(3):707Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein B, Singh PJ (2008) Innovation generation process: Applying the adopter categorization model and concept of “chasm” to better understand social and behavioral issues. Eur. J. Innovation Management 11(3):366–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilgram V, Brem A, Voigt K-I (2008) User-centric innovations in new product development–Systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online-tools. Internat. J. Inform. Management 12(3):419–458.Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond S (2002) Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Port Econom. J. 1(2):141–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Cummins C, Griliches Z, Hall B, Jaffe A (1984) Who does R&D and who patents? Griliches ZE, ed. R&D Patents and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 21–54.Google Scholar
• Cameron G (1996) On the measurement of real R&D: Divisia price indices for UK business enterprise R&D. Res. Evaluation 6(3):215–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Case D (2012) Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Dow S, Schunn C (2014) Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Stud. 1(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Chang X, Fu K, Low A, Zhang W (2015) Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. J. Finance Econom. 115(1):168–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Kavadias S (2008) A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Sci. 54(5):907–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Kavadias S (2013) R&D intensity and the new product development portfolio. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 60(4):664–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T Tian X (2018) Do anti-takeover provisions spur corporate innovation? A regression discontinuity analysis. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(3):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciftci M, Lev B, Radhakrishnan S (2011) Is research and development mispriced or properly risk adjusted? J. Accounting Auditing Finance 26(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (2001) Scale and scope in drug development: unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. J. Health Econom. 20(6):1033–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall BH, Rosenberg, N, ed. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Klepper S (1996a) A reprise of size and R & D. Econom. J. 106(437):925–951.Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Klepper S (1996b) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econom Statist. 78(2):232–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D (2009) Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth. Rev. Income Wealth 55(3):661–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crépon B, Duguet E, Mairessec J (1998) Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 7(2):115–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D, Hall B, Hottenrott H (2014) Patents as quality signals? The implications for financing constraints on R&D. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dane E, George J (2014) Unpacking affective forecasting and its ties to project work in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):181–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Stolowy H, Tenenhaus M (2007) R&D productivity: An exploratory international study. Rev. Accounting Finance 6(1):86–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A, Nembhard I (2009) Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. J. Product Innovation Management 26(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fazzari S, Hubbard R, Petersen B (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1:146–206.Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2003) Navigating the technology landscape of innovation. Sloan Management Rev. (Winter):15–23.Google Scholar
• Francis B, Hasan I, Sharma Z (2011) Incentives and innovation: Evidence from CEO compensation contracts. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper No. 17/2011, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Freeman C (1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Freeman C, Soete L (1997) The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Psychology Press, Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Simcoe T (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Sci. 57(8):1469–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Geroski P (1995) Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Graham J, Harvey C, Rajgopal S (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 40(1):3–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A (1997) The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Marketing 34(1):24–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith R, Harrison R, Van Reenen J (2006) How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of U.S. R&D spillovers on U.K. firms as a test of technology sourcing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1859–1875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1984) Productivity and R&D at the firm level. Griliches Z, ed. Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 339–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacklin F, Raurich V, Marxt C (2004) How incremental innovation becomes disruptive: The case of technology convergence. Proc. 2004 IEEE International, Engineering Management Conf., vol. 1 (IEEE, New York), 32–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Kruiniker H (1995) The role of working capital in the investment process. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Hall B, Oriani R (2006) Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 24(5):971–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Ziedonis R (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working paper, series no. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hall B, Lotti F, Mairesse J (2009) Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Bus Econom. 33(1):13–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Mairesse J, Mohnen P (2010) Measuring the returns to R&D. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2. (Elsevier, New York), 1033–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D (1998) R&D and productivity in German manufacturing firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 6(1):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2008) The effect of product introduction delays on operating performance. Management Sci. 54(5):878–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Low A, Teoh S (2012) Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? J. Finance 67(4):1457–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollander S (1965) The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of Du Pont Rayon Plants (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Jain A (2013) Learning by doing and the locus of innovative capability in biotechnology research. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1683–1700.Link, Google Scholar
• Jefferson G, Bai H, Guan X, Yu X (2006) R&D performance in Chinese industry. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 15(4–5):345–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones G (1986) Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers adjustments to organizations. Acad. Management J. 29(2):262–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R (2002) New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Acad. Management J. 45(5):995–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler E, Bierly P (2002) Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 49(1):2–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler E, Allocca M, Rahman N (2007) External knowledge accession and innovation speed in the small and medium sized enterprise (SME). SER 15(1):1–21.Google Scholar
• Kim T, Cable D, Kim S (2005) Socialization tactics, employee productivity, and person-organization fit. J. Appl. Psych. 90(2):232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein H, Weaver N (2000) The effectiveness of an organizational-level orientation training program in the socialization of new hires. Personel Psych. 53(1):47–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinschmidt E, De Brentani U, Salomo S (2007) Performance of global new product development programs: A resource-based view. J. Product Innovation Management 24(5):419–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor Y, Mahoney J (2005) How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management J. 26(5):489–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari S (2001) Capital markets research in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 31(1):105–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari S, Laguerre T, Leone A (2002) Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Rev. Accounting Stud. 7(4):355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremp E, Mairesse J (2004) Knowledge management, innovation, and productivity: A firm level exploration based on French manufacturing CIS3 data. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Langerak F, Hultink E (2005) The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 52(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat C (2011) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2006) The new new financial thing: The origins of financial innovations. J. Finance Econom. 79(2):223–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Wulf J (2007) Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(4):634–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Sorensen M, Stromberg P (2013) Private equity and investment in innovation: Evidence from patents. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 25(2):95–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J Account Econom. 21(1):107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li W, Hall B (2016) Depreciation of business R&D capital. Working paper, series no. 22473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lieberman M, Montgomery D (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin B-W, Lee Y, Hung S-C (2006) R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. J. Bus Res. 59(6):679–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C, Kavadias S (2002) Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns. Management Sci. 48(10):1227–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Lööf H, Heshmati A (2002) Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: A firm-level innovation study. Internat. J. Production Econom. 76(1):61–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lööf H, Heshmati A (2006) On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 15(4–5):317–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March J (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decision Happens (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Massini S, Lewin A, Greve H (2005) Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res. Policy 34(10):1550–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mecca J, Mumford M (2014) Imitation and creativity: Beneficial effects of propulsion strategies and specificity. J. Creative Behav. 48(3):209–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moch M, Morse E (1977) Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 42(5):716–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Swift T (2014) Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management J. 35(1):126–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1977) In search of useful theory of innovation. Res. Policy 6(1):36–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman D, Verganti R (2014) Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design Issues 30(1):78–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pandit S, Wasley C, Zach T (2011) The effect of R&D inputs and outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D expenditures. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 26(1):121–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pich M, Loch C, DeMeyer A (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Sci. 48(8):1008–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Pruett M, Thomas H (2008) Experience-based learning in innovation and production. R&D Management 38(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prusa T, Schmitz J (1991) Are new firms an important source of innovation? Evidence from the PC software industry. Econom. Lett. 35(3):339–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintana-Garcia C, Benavides-Velasco C (2008) Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Res. Policy 37(3):492–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Revilla A, Fernández Z (2012) The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes. Technovation 32(11):609–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel E, Nijstad B, Stroebe W (2007) Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(6):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers M (2010) R&D and productivity: Using UK firm-level data to inform policy. Empirica 37(3):329–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Stat. 71(1):135–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Statist. J. 9(1):86–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roussel P, Saad K, Erickson T (1991) Third Generation R&D (Harvard Business School Press, Watertown, MA).Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury S (2006) Earnings management through real activities manipulation. J. Accounting Econom. 42(3):335–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer R (2011) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Scherer F, Ross D (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed. (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston). Google Scholar
• Simonton D (1997) Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psych. Rev. 104(1):66–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith L, Amiot C, Smith J, Callan V, Terry D (2013) The social validation and coping model of organizational identity development a longitudinal test. J. Management 39(7):1952–1978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D (2003) Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation. Strategic Management J. 24(1):17–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer S, Loch C, Dong J (2009) Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in startup companies: An empirical study. Organ. Sci. 20(1):118–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Podolny J (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D (2000) Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning. 33(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH, Niederkofler M (1998) When product development performance makes a difference. J. Product Innovation Management 15(1):3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J Schein E (1979) Towards a theory of organizational socialization. Res. Organ. Behav. 1:209–264.Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E (2009) Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Internat. J. Innovation Sci. 1(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J (1990) Toshiba will pay TI royalty on chip patents. Los Angeles Times (December 12), http://articles.latimes.com/1990-12-12/business/fi-5989_1_japanese-patent.Google Scholar
• Weisberg R (2011) Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater: A case study in inside-the-box creativity. Creativity Res. J. 23(4):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J. Econometrics 126(1):25–51.Crossref, Google Scholar