Banking on “Mobile Money”: The Implications of Mobile Money Services on the Value Chain

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0717

References

  • Adengo J, Kamukama E (2016) Uganda has highest mobile money fraud cases – report. Daily Monitor (September 9). http://www.monitor.co.ug/Business/Uganda-has-highest-mobile-money-fraud-cases--report/688322-3374002-3ugtokz/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Adner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4):98–107.Google Scholar
  • Ahn JH, Han SP, Lee YS (2006) Customer churn analysis: Churn determinants and mediation effects of partial defection in the Korean mobile telecommunications service industry. Telecomm. Policy 30(10):552–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almazan M, Vonthron N (2014) Mobile Money Profitability: A Digital Ecosystem to Drive Healty Margins (Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, London).Google Scholar
  • Amemiya T (1985) Advanced Econometrics (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Anderson EG, Parker GG (2013) Integration and cospecialization of emerging complemenetary technologies by startups. Production Oper. Management 22(6):1356–1373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3):399–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bae J, Insead MG (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian K, Drake D (2015) Mobile money: The effect of service quality and competition on demand. Working paper No. 15-059, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, Vargo SL (2015) Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. Management Inform. Syst. Quart. 39(1):135–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2006) Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. J. Banking Finance 30(5):1581–1603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava HK (2016) Mixed bundling of two independent valued goods. Management Sci. 59(9):2170–2185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econom. Surv. 22(1):31–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2016) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internet R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A (2005) Feature complementarity and assortment in choice. J. Consumer Res. 31(4):748–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T, McKay C (2015) How M-Shwari Works: The Story So Far. Access to Finance FORUM: Reports by CGAP and Its Partners (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Demirgüç-Kunt A, Klapper LF (2012) Measuring financial inclusion: The global findex database. Working paper, World Bank Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • DeYoung R, Lang WW, Nolle DL (2007) How the Internet affects output and performance at community banks. J. Banking Finance 31(4):1033–1060.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans DS, Heckman JJ (1984) A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the Bell system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(4):615–623.Google Scholar
  • Fang E, Palmatier RW, Steenkamp JBEM (2008) Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. J. Marketing 72(5):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fries S, Taci A (2005) Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries. J. Banking Finance 29(1):55–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Genakos C, Valletti T (2011) Testing the “waterbed” effect in mobile telephony. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(6):1114–1142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerpott TJ, Rams W, Schindler A (2001) Customer retention, loyalty, and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecomm. Policy 25(4):249–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gidvani L, Pasti F, Hodiwalla F, Aneja D, Kayal G (2016) The Business Case for Payments Banks in India (Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, London).Google Scholar
  • Grzybowski L (2005) Regulation of mobile telephony across the European Union: An empirical analysis. J. Regulatory Econom. 28(1):47–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guiltinan JP (1987) The price bundling of services: A normative framework. J. Marketing 51(2):74–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64(4):605–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hernando I, Nieto MJ (2007) Is the Internet delivery channel changing banks’ performance? The case of Spanish banks. J. Banking Finance 31(4):1083–1099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hess AM, Rothaermel FT (2011) When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 32(8):895–909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirano K, Imbens GW (2001) Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services Outcomes Res. Methodol. 2(3):259–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes N, Lonie S (2007) M-PESA: Mobile money for the “unbanked” turning cellphones into 24-hour tellers in Kenya. Innov. (Camb, Mass). 2(1–2):63–81.Google Scholar
  • Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jack W, Ray A, Suri T (2013) Transaction networks: Evidence from mobile money in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):356–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jack W, Suri T (2014) Risk sharing and transactions costs: Evidence from Kenya’s mobile money revolution. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):183–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James C (1995) When do banks take equity in debt restructurings? Rev. Finance Stud. 8(4):1209–1234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar PR, Ravi V (2007) Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques—A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R, Sachdev I (2015) Mobile money services: Design and development for financial inclusion. Working paper, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Lee H, Schmidt G (2016) Using value chains to enhance innovation. Production Oper. Management 26(4):617–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H, Tang CS (2017) Socially and environmentally responsible value chain innovations: New operations management research opportunities. Management Sci. 64(3):983–996.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leishman P (2010) Is There Really Any Money in Mobile Money? (Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, London).Google Scholar
  • Liu H, Chintagunta PK, Zhu T (2010) Complementarities and the demand for home broadband internet services. Marketing Sci. 29(4):701–720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lonie S, Wagener I (2012) Transformational banking from transformational relationships: Case study of a bank and mobile network operator partnership. J. Payments Strategic Syst. 6(4):333–344.Google Scholar
  • Majumdar SK (1998) On the utilization of resources: Perspectives from the US telecommunications industry. Strategic Management J. 19(9):809–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantovani A, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Sci. 62(2):534–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management J. 15(52):149–165.Google Scholar
  • Mbiti I, Weil DN (2013) The home economics of e-money: Velocity, cash management, and discount rates of M-pesa users. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):369–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath F, Lonie S (2013) Platforms for Successful Mobile Money Services (Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, London).Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
  • Ngigi G (2012) M-Kesho growth stalls over hitch on profit sharing. Business Daily (March 25), http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/M-Kesho-growth-stalls-over-hitch-on-profit-sharing–/539552-1373474-g6ndp1z/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
  • Prasad A, Venkatesh R, Mahajan V (2010) Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Sci. 56(12):2224–2236.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robins JM, Rotnitzky A (1995) Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(429):122–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Amer. Statist. 39(1):33–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin DB (2001) Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services Outcomes Res. Methodol. 2(3):169–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sealey C, Lindley J (1977) Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. J. Finance 32(4):1251–1266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharpe SA (1997) The effect of consumer switching costs on prices: A theory and its application to the bank deposit market. Rev. Indust. Organ. 12(1):79–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sianesi B (2004) An evaluation of the Swedish System of active labor market programs in the 1990s. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):133–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JA, Todd PE (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? J. Econometrics 125(1):305–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stremersch S, Tellis GJ (2002) Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. J. Marketing 66(1):55–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart EA (2010) Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statist. Sci. 25(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Duckworth K, Simmons J, Song Z, Chernew M, Barry CL (2014) Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Services Outcomes Res. Methodol. 14(4):166–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veall MR, Zimmermann KF (1994) Practitioners corner: Goodness of fit measures in the tobit model. Oxf. Bull. Econom. Statist. 56(4):485–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Velayuthan D (2010) Coopetition between MNO’s and banks in provisioning mobile money services today.” Africa Telecoms (Issue 8), http://www.euroinvestor.dk/pdf/cse/11369052_21811.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Winship C, Radbill L (1994) Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 23(2):230–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xu X, Venkatesh V, Tam KY, Hong SJ (2010) Model of migration and use of platforms: Role of hierarchy, current generation, and complementarities in consumer settings. Management Sci. 56(8):1304–1323.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.