Is Servicization a Win-Win Strategy? Profitability and Environmental Implications of Servicization

References

• Agrawal V, Bellos I (2016) The potential of servicizing as a green business model. Management Sci. 63(5):1545–1562.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas V (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Souza GC (2013) How does product recovery affect quality choice? Production Oper. Management 22(4):991–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avci B, Girotra K, Netessine S (2014) Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: Adoption and environmental impact. Management Sci. 61(4):772–794.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacon JB (2013) An interesting uncertainty-based combinatoric problem in spare parts forecasting: The FRED system. White paper, Xerox Corporation, Webster, NY.Google Scholar
• Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. J. Consumer Res. 39(2):56–76.Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Gilbert SM (2005) Selling and leasing strategies for durable goods with complementary products. Management Sci. 51(8):1278–1290.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Gilbert SM (2009) Implications of channel structure for leasing or selling durable goods. Marketing Sci. 28(5):918–934.Link, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) Employment, hours, and earnings from the Current Employment Statistics Survey (National). Accessed September 10, 2013, http://data.bls.gov/ces.Google Scholar
• Bustinza OF, Bigdeli AZ, Baines T, Elliot C (2015) Servitization and competitive advantage: The importance of organizational structure and value chain position. Res. Tech. Management 58(5):53–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng S (2004) R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. Accounting Rev. 79(2):305–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Agrawal N, Agrawal V (2006) Winning in the aftermarket. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(5):129–138.Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, DeCroix GA (2001) Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. 47(7):881–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. 18(1):42–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Deshpande V, Iyer AV, Cho R (2006) Efficient supply chain management at the US Coast Guard using part-age dependent supply replenishment policies. Oper. Res. 54(6):1028–1040.Link, Google Scholar
• Drake DF, Kleindorfer PR, Van Wassenhove LNV (2016) Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1006–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Electrolux (1999) Electrolux offers 7,000 households free washing machines. Press release (November 17), http://www.electroluxgroup.com/en/electrolux-offers-7000-households-free-washing-machines-1885/.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Exploiting the employment potential of green growth. Commission staff working document, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014) New study on product durability launched by DG Environment. Accessed May 25, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu.Google Scholar
• Ferrer G, Swaminathan JM (2006) Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Sci. 52(1):15–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Fuji Xerox (2016) Our product solutions. Accessed May 25, 2016, https://www.fujixerox.com.sg/products.Google Scholar
• Gilbert SM, Jonnalagedda S (2011) Durable products, time inconsistency, and lock-in. Management Sci. 57(9):1655–1670.Link, Google Scholar
• Guajardo JA, Cohen MA, Kim S, Netessine S (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Hawken P (2010) The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Heal GM (2008) When Principles Pay: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Interface (2016) Interface markets. Accessed May 15, 2016, http://www.interface.com/US/en-US/about/markets.Google Scholar
• Intlekofer K (2009) Environmental implications of leasing. Unpublished master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Iravani S, DuenyasI (2002) Integrated maintenance and production control of a deteriorating production system. IIE Trans. 34(5):423–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Cohen M, Netessine S (2007) Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Sci. 53(12):1843–1858.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Cohen MA, Netessine S, Veeraraghavan S (2010) Contracting for infrequent restoration and recovery of mission-critical systems. Management Sci. 56(9):1551–1567.Link, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O, Kohli R, Montoya R (2011) The design of durable goods. Marketing Sci. 30(1):111–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J, Martimort D (2009) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Seim K, Skiera B (2007) Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Sci. 26(5):698–710.Link, Google Scholar
• Leinbach-Reyhle N (2016) Customer loyalty in today’s modern retail world. Forbes (April 20), http://www.forbes.com/sites/nicoleleinbachreyhle/2016/04/20/customer-loyalty-in-todays-modern-retail-world/#564c2173008e.Google Scholar
• Li D, Mishra N (2017) Pulling your partners into the same boat: Engaging suppliers under outcome-based compensations. Working paper, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Lim MK, Mak H, Rong Y (2014) Toward mass adoption of electric vehicles: Impact of the range and resale anxieties. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):101–119.Link, Google Scholar
• Llopis G (2014) Consumers are no longer brand loyal. Forbes (December 10), http://www.forbes.com/sites/glennllopis/2014/12/10/consumers-are-no-longer-brand-loyal/#43dbcfcd6058.Google Scholar
• Mizik N, Jacobson R (2007) Myopic marketing management: Evidence of the phenomenon and its long-term performance consequences in the SEO context. Marketing Sci. 26(3):361–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. 26(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Olesinski B, Opala P, Rozkrut M, Toroj A (2014) Short-termism in business: Causes, mechanisms and consequences. EY Poland report, Ernst & Young Global Limited, London. Accessed May 21, 2016, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_Poland_Report/$FILE/Short-termism_raport_EY.pdf. Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Quinn J (2003) Interface’s Evergreen Services Agreement. HBS Case 603-112, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Oregon State University (2014) Printing and mailing services. Accessed June 15, 2014, http://printmail.oregonstate.edu.Google Scholar
• Örsdemir A, Deshpande V, Parlakturk AK (2017) Is servicization a win-win strategy? Profitability and environmental implications of servicization. Accessed September 30, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2679404.Google Scholar
• Örsdemir A, Kemahlioglu-Ziya E, Parlaktürk AK (2014) Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 23(1):48–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. 55(3):333–347.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg S (2007) Sustainability through servicizing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 48(2):83–91.Google Scholar
• Russo M (2008) Environmental Management: Readings and Cases,2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoughton M, Frantz C, Votta TJ, Krop PER (2009) “Green servicizing” for a more sustainable US economy: Key concepts, tools and analyses to inform policy engagement. Technical Report EPA530-R-09-006, U.S. EPA Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Swartz E (2014) The transformation of GE: From “We bring good things to life” to industrial machines in the cloud. Accessed March 25, 2016, https://www.americaninno.com/boston/the-transformation-of-ge-from-we-bring-good-things-to-life-to-industrial-machines-in-the-cloud/.Google Scholar
• Toffel MW (2002) Contracting for servicizing. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• University of California, Davis (2014) Repro Graphics. Accessed June 15, 2014, http://reprographics.ucdavis.edu.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce (2013) Advance gross domestic product by industry. Accessed November 5, 2013, https://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm.Google Scholar
• White AL, Stoughton M, Feng L (1999) Servicizing: The quiet transition to extended producer responsibility. Technical report submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Yadav P, Miller DM, Schmidt CP, Drake R (2003) McGriff Treading Company implements service contracts with shared savings. Interfaces 33(6):18–29.Link, Google Scholar