Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products

References

• Agrawal V, Atasu A, Van Ittersum K (2015) Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers perceived value of new products. Management Sci. 61(1):60–72.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Kavadias S, Toktay LB (2016) The limits of planned obsolescence for conspicuous durable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):216–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas V (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Alev I, Atasu A, Ergun O, Toktay LB (2017) Extended producer responsibility for pharmaceuticals. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2015a) Apple recyling program. Accessed May 4, 2016, https://www.apple.com/recycling/gift-card/.Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2015b) Apple store. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://store.apple.com/us.Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2015c) iPod and mobile recyling program. Accessed May 4, 2016, https://www.apple.com/recycling/ipod-cell-phone/.Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L (2012) An operations perspective on product take-back legislation for e-waste: Theory, practice, and research needs. Production Oper. Management 21(3):407–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avci B, Girotra K, Netessine S (2015) Electric vehicles with a switching station: Adoption and environmental impact. Management Sci. 61(4):772–794.Link, Google Scholar
• Bond E, Samuelson L (1984) Durable good monopolies with rational expectations and replacement sales. RAND J. Econom. 13(3):336–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brightstar (2015) iPhone recycle. Accessed May 4, 2016, https://reuserecycle.abbti.brightstarcorp.com/Iphonehome.aspx.Google Scholar
• CalRecycle (2015) Active participants in the covered electronic waste payment system. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Electronics/Reports/Detail.aspx?ParticipantID=138.Google Scholar
• CalRecycle (2018) Electronic waste recycling act. Accessed November 3, 2018, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Electronics/Act2003/.Google Scholar
• Chen J, Esteban S, Shum M (2013) When do secondary markets harm firms? Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2911–2934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo L, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove L (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• Dell (2013) Dell trade-in and recycling program. Accessed November 3, 2018, https://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/19/campaigns/trade-in-program.Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
• Drake D (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign comparative advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Electronics Recycling Coordination Clearinghouse (2015) Map of states with legislation. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.ecycleclearinghouse.org/content.aspx?pageid=10.Google Scholar
• Electronics TakeBack Coalition (2013) Brief comparison of state laws on electronics recycling. Accessed November 3, 2018, http://www.electronicstakeback.com/wp-content/uploads/Compare_state_laws_chart.pdf.Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlioglu-Ziya E (2015) A comparison of product take-back compliance schemes. Production Oper. Management 24(1):71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlioglu E, Swaminathan J (2017) Impact of take-back regulation on the remanufacturing industry. Production Oper. Management 26(5):924–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteban S (2006) Equilibrium dynamics in semi-durable goods markets. Working paper, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid.Google Scholar
• Esteban S, Shum M (2007) Durable-goods oligopoly with secondary markets: The case of automobiles. RAND J. Econom. 38(2):332–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Europa-Environment (2012) On waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Accessed May 4, 2016, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/weee/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Circular economy package. Accessed November 3, 2018, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
• Fishbein B, Ehrenfeld J, Young J (2000) Extended Producer Responsibility: A Materials Policy for the 21st Century (Inform, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Fujitsu (2015) WEEE: Our responsibility. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.fujitsu.com/fts/services/other/remarketing/weee/index.html.Google Scholar
• Gui L, Atasu A, Ergun O, Toktay LB (2013) Implementing extended producer responsibility legislation: A multi-stakeholder case analysis. J. Indust. Ecology 17(2):262–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999a) Adverse selection in durable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1097–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999b) Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J. Econom. 30(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (2002) The role of leasing under adverse selection. J. Public Econom. 110(1):113–143.Google Scholar
• Hewlett-Packard (2007) Product reuse and recycling. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/globalcitizenship/07gcreport/productreuse.html.Google Scholar
• Hewlett-Packard (2015) Consumer buyback and planet partners recycling program. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html.Google Scholar
• Huang S, Yang Y, Anderson K (2001) A theory of finitely durable goods monopoly with used-goods market and transaction costs. Management Sci. 47(11):1515–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang X, Atasu A, Toktay LB (2019) Design implications of extended producer responsibility for durable products. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• IHS Technology (2010) iSuppli estimates new iPod Nano bill of materials at $43.73. Accessed May 4, 2016, https://technology.ihs.com/388837/isuppli-estimates-new-ipod-nano-bill-of-materials-at-4373.Google Scholar
• IHS Technology (2014) iPhone 6 Plus: $100 costlier for customers to buy. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://press.ihs.com/press-release/design-supply-chain/iphone-6-plus-100-costlier-consumers-buy\%E2\%80\%94just-1550-more-expensive-.Google Scholar
• Jacobs B, Subramanian R (2012) Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production Oper. Management 21(1):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Keoleian G, Horie Y (2006) Optimal household refrigerator replacement policy for life cycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost. Energy Policy 34(15):2310–2323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Zheng Y, Erhun F (2013a) The NGO’s dilemma: How to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):649–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Erhun F, Carlson R, Rafinejad D (2013b) Replacement decisions for potentially hazardous substances. Production Oper. Management 22(4):958–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunz N, Atasu A, Mayers K, Van Wassenhove L (2014) Extended producer responsibility: Stakeholder concerns and future developments. Technical report, INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Lifset R (1993) Take it back: Extended producer responsibility as a form of incentive-based environmental policy. J. Resource Management Tech. 21(4):163–175.Google Scholar
• Maine Department of Environmental Protection (2013) Manufacturer guide to Maine’s electronic waste recycling law. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/ewaste/oemplan.html.Google Scholar
• Ni H, Zeng E (2009) Law enforcement and global collaboration are the keys to containing e-waste tsunami in China. Environ. Sci. Tech. 43(11):3991–3994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NY Department of Environmental Conservation (2013) Guidance for municipal electronic waste collection sites. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/66879.html.Google Scholar
• Oraiopoulos N, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2012) Relicensing as a secondary market strategy. Management Sci. 58(5):1022–1037.Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. 55(3):333–347.Link, Google Scholar
• Product Stewardship Institute (2014) Map of the state EPR laws. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.productstewardship.us/?State\_EPR\_Laws\_Map.Google Scholar
• Rao R, Narasimhan O, John G (2009) Understanding the role of trade-ins in durable goods markets: Theory and evidence. Marketing Sci. 28(5):950–967.Link, Google Scholar
• Ray S, Boyaci T, Aras N (2005) Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(3):208–228.Link, Google Scholar
• Toyasaki F, Boyaci T, Verter V (2011) An analysis of monopolistic and competitive take-back schemes for WEEE recycling. Production Oper. Management 20(6):805–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA (2013) Non-hazardous waste management hierarchy. Accessed May 4, 2016, http://www.epa.gov/waste/nonhaz/municipal/hierarchy.htm.Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1997) Eliminating the market for secondhand goods: An alternative explanation for leasing. J. Law Econom. 40(1):61–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (2003) Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar