Management and Effects of In-Store Promotional Displays

References

• Ailawadi KL., Harlam BA, Cesar J, Trounce D (2006) Promotion profitability for a retailer: The role of promotion, brand, category, and store characteristics. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):518–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouad A, Segev D (2015) Display optimization for vertically differentiated locations under multinomial logit choice preferences. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Bai R, Van Woensel T, Kendall G, Burke EK (2013) A new model and a hyper-heuristic approach for two-dimensional shelf space allocation. 4OR 11(1):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ, Ide EA (1956) Variety in retailing. Management Sci. 3(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Chiang J, Padmanabhan V (1999) The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization. Marketing Sci. 18(4):504–526.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Gupta S, Jain D (1998) Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Sci. 44(11-part-1):1533–1547.Link, Google Scholar
• Bezawada R, Balachander S, Kannan P, Shankar V (2009) Cross-category effects of aisle and display placements: A spatial modeling approach and insights. J. Marketing 73(3):99–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bultez A, Naert P (1988) SH.A.R.P.: Shelf allocation for retailers’ profit. Marketing Sci. 7(3):211–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardell NS (1997) Variance components structures for the extreme-value and logistic distributions with application to models of heterogeneity. Econometric Theory 13(2):185–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier M (1975) Increase in sales due to in-store display. J. Marketing Res. 12(4):426–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK (1993) Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. 12(2):184–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Corstjens M, Doyle P (1981) A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Sci. 27(7):822–833.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis J, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2013) Assortment planning under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraint structures. Working paper, Department of IEOR, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Davis JM, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper. Res. 62(2):250–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Dhar SK., Hoch SJ, Kumar N (2001)Effective category management depends on the role of the category. J. Retailing 77(2):165–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Euromonitor Int. (2017) Brand shares. Data retrieved from Passport GMID. Accessed May 14, 2019, http://go.euromonitor.com/passport.html.Google Scholar
• Feldman J, Topaloglu H (2015) Assortment optimization under the multinomial logit model with nested consideration sets. Working paper, Olin Business School, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Constrained assortment optimization for the nested logit model. Management Sci. 60(10):2583–2601.Link, Google Scholar
• Geismar HN, Dawande M, Murthi B, Sriskandarajah C (2015) Maximizing revenue through two-dimensional shelf-space allocation. Production Oper. Management 24(7):1148–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JD (1998) When and what to buy: A nested logit model of coffee purchase. J. Forecasting 17(3/4):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S (1988) Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. 25(4):342–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui SK, Inman JJ, Huang Y, Suher J (2013) The effect of in-store travel distance on unplanned spending: Applications to mobile promotion strategies. J. Marketing 77(2):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman JJ, Winer RS (1998) Where the rubber meets the road: A model of in-store consumer decision making. Technical Report 98-122, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Xu Y (2011) Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. 57(9):1546–1563.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Fisher ML, Vaidyanathan R (2008) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N, Smith SA, eds. Retail Supply Chain Management (Springer, New York), 99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JS, Bradlow ET, Fader PS (2005) An exploratory look at supermarket shopping paths. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 22(4):395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang PSH, Parreño-Selva J (2012) Cross-category demand effects of price promotions. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(4):572–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang PS, Selva JP, Dijk AV, Wittink DR (2008) Decomposing the sales promotion bump accounting for cross-category effects. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(3):201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S (1999) The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. 18(2):95–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Manrai AK, Andrews RL (1998) Two-stage discrete choice models for scanner panel data: An assessment of process and assumptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111(2):193–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Res. Record (673):72–77.Google Scholar
• Nair H, Dubé J-P, Chintagunta P (2005) Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Marketing Sci. 24(3):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Nordfält, J, Lange, F (2013) In-store demonstrations as a promotion tool. J. Retailing Consumer Services 20(1):20–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K, Hanssens DM, Siddarth S (2002) The long-term effects of price promotions on category incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):421–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips M, Parsons AG, Wilkinson HJ, Ballantine PW (2015) Competing for attention with in-store promotions. J. Retailing Consumer Services 26:141–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Point-of-Purchase Advertising Institute (2012) 2012 shopper engagement study. Technical report, POPAI, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Rupp R (2015) Surviving the sneaky psychology of supermarkets. National Geographic (June 14), https://www.nationalgeographic.com/people-and-culture/food/the-plate/2015/06/15/surviving-the-sneaky-psychology-of-supermarkets.Google Scholar
• Stoops GT, Pearson MM, et al.. (1988) Direct product profit: A view from the supermarket industry. J. Food Distribution Res. 19(2):10–14.Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trivedi M, Gauri DK, Ma Y (2016) Measuring the efficiency of category-level sales response to promotions. Management Sci. 63(10):3473–3488.Link, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Neslin SA (2017) Sales promotion models. Wierenga B, van der Lans R, eds. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 13–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Gupta S, Wittink DR (2003) Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):481–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Leeflang PS, Wittink DR (2004) Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Sci. 23(3):317–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Vilcassim NJ, Chintagunta PK (1995) Investigating retailer product category pricing from household scanner panel data. J. Retailing 71(2):103–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JB, Mason JB, Paksoy CH (1982) Assessing the impact of short-term supermarket strategy variables. J. Marketing Res. 19(1):72–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2006) An integrated choice model incorporating alternative mechanisms for consumers’ reactions to in-store display and feature advertising. Marketing Sci. 25(3):278–290.Link, Google Scholar