Choice of Electronic Waste Recycling Standard Under Recovery Channel Competition

References

• Alev I, Agrawal VV, Atasu A (2019) Extended producer responsibility for durable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Allied Market Research (2015) E-waste management market is expected to reach $49.4 billion, global, by 2020. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://bit.ly/2w7eFzA.Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Guide VJ, Wassenhove L (2008a) Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research. Production Oper. Management 17(5):483–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove LN (2008b) Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Sci. 54(10):1731–1746.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Van Wassenhove L, Sarvary M (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldé C, Forti V, Gray V, Kuehr R, Stegmann P (2017) The global e-waste monitor 2017 (UN University, Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Tokyo). Accessed November 29, 2018, https://bit.ly/2CpNqSE.Google Scholar
• Castka P, Corbett C (2016) Governance of eco-labels: Expert opinion and media coverage. J. Bus. Ethics 135(2):309–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole D, Mahapatra S, Webster S (2017) A comparison of buyback and trade-in policies to acquire used products for remanufacturing. J. Bus. Logist. 38(3):217–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker P, Driesen L, Rayp G (2005) Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. J. Consumer Affairs 39(2):363–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo LG, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• EPA (2013) Common wastes & materials—recycling. Accessed November 29, 2018, http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/materials/ecycling/faq.htm.Google Scholar
• ERP (2005) European recycling platform. Accessed November 29, 2018, http://www.electronicsrecycling.org/ncer/userdocuments/erp_presentation.pdf.Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya E (2015) A comparison of product take-back compliance schemes. Production Oper. Management 24(1):71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya E, Swaminathan JM (2016) Take-back legislation: Consequences for remanufacturing and environment. Decision Sci. J. 47(2):219–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ETC (2010) Electronics recycling standards compared: R2 and e-Stewards. Accessed November 29, 2018, http://wwwelectronicstakeback.com/wp-content/uploads/Chart_Comparing_R2_eStewards1.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ferguson M, Guide VJ, Koca E, Souza GC (2009) The value of quality grading in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 18(3):300–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson ME, Toktay LB (2006) The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management 15(3):351–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleischmann M, Beullens P, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Wassenhove LN (2001) The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Production Oper. Management 10(2):156–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene J (2013) Staples agrees to progressive e-waste standards. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://www.cnet.com/news/staples-agrees-to-progressive-e-waste-standards/.Google Scholar
• Gui L, Atasu A, Ergun Ö, Toktay LB (2015) Efficient implementation of collective extended producer responsibility legislation. Management Sci. 62(4):1098–1123.Link, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Teunter R, Van Wassenhove L (2003) Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(4):303–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Wassenhove L (2001) Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 10(2):142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hageluken C (2006) Improving metal returns and eco-efficiency in electronics recycling. Proc. 2006 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Electronics Environment 2006 (IEEE, New York), 218–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbaugh R, Maxwell JW, Roussillon B (2011) Label confusion: The groucho effect of uncertain standards. Management Sci. 57(9):1512–1527.Link, Google Scholar
• Heyes A, Martin S (2016) Social labeling by competing egos: A model with multiple issues and entry. Management Sci. 63(6):1800–1813.Link, Google Scholar
• Huisman J, Stevels A, Middendorf A (2001) Calculating environmentally weighted recyclability of consumer electronic products using different environmental assessment models. Proc. 2001 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Electronics Environment 2001 (IEEE, New York), 88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs BW, Subramanian R (2012) Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Production Oper. Management 21(1):85–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Julander A, Lundgren L, Skare L, Grandér M, Palm B, Vahter M, Lidén C (2014) Formal recycling of e-waste leads to increased exposure to toxic metals: An occupational exposure study from Sweden. Environ. Internat. 73:243–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitsara I (2014) E-waste and innovation: Unlocking hidden value. Accessed November 29, 2018, http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2014/03/article_0001.html.Google Scholar
• Lim M, Mak H, Park S (2018) Money well spent? Operations, mainstreaming, and fairness of fair trade. Working paper, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
• Majumder P, Groenevelt H (2001) Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 10(2):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markets and Markets (2015) E-waste management market by material recovery, source type, and by geography—Forecast to 2020. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/electronic-waste-management-market-373.html.Google Scholar
• Meoli D (2016) Electronic opportunity. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://bit.ly/2w1RQgs.Google Scholar
• Murali K, Lim MK, Petruzzi NC (2018) The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print June 27, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0703.Google Scholar
• NMI (2013) Generate breakthrough insights in sustainability. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://bit.ly/2P63qjo.Google Scholar
• Oraiopoulos N, Ferguson ME, Toktay LB (2012) Relicensing as a secondary market strategy. Management Sci. 58(5):1022–1037.Link, Google Scholar
• Örsdemir A, Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya E, Parlaktürk AK (2014) Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 23(1):48–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robotis A, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) The effect of remanufacturing on procurement decisions for resellers in secondary markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(3):688–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M, Simcoe T, Wang Y (2015) Differentiation in adoption of environmental standards: LEED from 2000-2010. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Salema MIG, Barbosa-Povoa AP, Novais AQ (2007) An optimization model for the design of a capacitated multi-product reverse logistics network with uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179(3):1063–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savaskan RC, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Management Sci. 52(1):1–14.Link, Google Scholar
• Savaskan RC, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. 50(2):239–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Souza GC (2013) Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review and future research. Decision Sci. 44(1):7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szczepanski M (2016) The challenges low oil prices bring to the waste and recycling industry. Waste360 (March 16), https://www.waste360.com/business-operations/challenges-low-oil-prices-bring-waste-and-recycling-industry.Google Scholar
• Tian F, Sosic G, Debo L (2018) Manufacturers' competition and cooperation in sustainability: Stable recycling alliances. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Toyasaki F, Boyacι T, Verter V (2011) An analysis of monopolistic and competitive take-back schemes for weee recycling. Production Oper. Management 20(6):805–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsamis A, Coyne M (2015) Recovery of rare earths from electronic wastes policy department A: Economic and scientific policy, european parliament. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://bit.ly/2MefZve.Google Scholar
• Willard L (2015) New York’s electronic waste ban begins in 2015. Accessed November 29, 2018, https://www.wamc.org/post/new-yorks-electronic-waste-ban-begins-2015.Google Scholar