OM Forum—Innovative Online Platforms: Research Opportunities

References

• Alaei S, Malekian A, Mostagir M (2018) A dynamic model of crowdfunding. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2018) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Cil EB (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Cil EB (2017) Skill management in large-scale service marketplaces. Production Oper. Management 26(11):2050–2070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold R, Hildebrandt C (2017) The socio-economic impact of online platforms. Research brief, June 2017, Wissenschaftliches Institut for Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste, Bad Honnef, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ayeh JK, Au N, Law R (2013) Do we believe in Tripadvisor? J. Travel Res. 52(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Marinesi S, Tsoukalas G (2017) Does crowdfunding benefit entrepreneurs and venture capital investors? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Badger E (2018) What’s the right number of taxis (or Uber or Lyft cars) in a city? New York Times (August 10), B1.Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Lipman B (1989) Provision of public goods: Fully implementing the core through private contributions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 56(4):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Tang CS (2018) Can multiple on-demand service platforms coexist? Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: Part I. J. Political Econom. 81(4):813–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belavina E, Girotra K (2012) The relational advantage of intermediation. Management Sci. 58(9):1614–1631.Link, Google Scholar
• Belavina E, Marinesi S, Tsoukalas G (2018) Designing crowdfunding platform rules to deter misconduct. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2015) Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Bernhard H, Courcoubetis C (2017) Drivers, riders, and service providers: The impact of the sharing economy on mobility. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Ding JY, Kong G, Taylor T (2018) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A, Smolin A (2018) The design and price of information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide A (2018) Skepticism beats snopes as an antidote to fake news. Wall Street Journal (June 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/skepticism-beats-snopes-as-an-antidote-to-fake-news-1528497662.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Google Scholar
• Blockchain at Berkeley (2018) Ethereum and smart contracts: Enabling a decentralized future. Accessed August 16, 2018, https://github.com/rustielin/Blockchain-Notes/blob/master/note7.md.Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2005) Bridging the trust gap in electronic markets: A strategic framework for empirical study. Geunes J, Akcali E, Pardalos PM, Romeijn HE, Shen ZJ, eds. Applications of Supply Chain Management and e-Commerce Research (Springer, New York), 195–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill-levels in rank order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burdett K, Coles MG (1997) Marriage and class. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):141–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Chakraborty S, Swinney R (2017) Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Chang J-W (2017) The economics of crowdfunding. Working paper, California State University, Fullerton.Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Sheldon M (2015) Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Hu M (2018) Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Shantikumar JG, Shen ZJM (2015) Incentive for peer-to-peer knowledge sharing among farmers in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1430–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovations: It is not just about technology anymore. Strategy Leadership 25(6):12–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano MA (2011) Platform wars come to social media. Comm. ACM 54(4):31–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Sahin O, Tang CS (2018) Sequential screening on an online matching platform. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Damiano E, Li H (2007) Price discrimination and efficient matching. Econom. Theory 30(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Angelo JD, Toma CL (2016) There are plenty of fish in the sea: The effects of choice overload and reversibility on online daters’ satisfaction with selected partners. Media Psych. 20(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanism. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2016) Enterprise crowdsourcing and the growing fragmentation of work. Accessed June 11, 2018, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/de/Documents/Innovation/us-cons-enterprise-crowdsourcing-and-growing-fragmentation-of-work%20(3).pdf.Google Scholar
• Du L, Hu M, Wu J (2017) Continuous stimulus in crowdfunding. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2013) All eyes on the sharing economy. (March 9) https://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21572914-collaborative-consumption-technology-makes-it-easier-people-rent-items.Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2016) Internet users rely on reviews when deciding which products to purchase. Accessed December 5, 2017, https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Internet-Users-Rely-on-Reviews-Deciding-Which-Products-Purchase/1014465.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A digital single market strategy for Europe. COM/2015/0192 final. Accessed November 27, 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/digital-single-market-strategy-europe-com2015-192-final.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017) Online platforms. Accessed November 16, 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/policies/online-platforms.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2016) The “sharing” economy: Issues facing platforms, participants, and regulations. Staff report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Field M (2017) Alternatives to Uber: Apps to use if Uber is banned. Telegraph (September 23), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/09/22/alternatives-uber-apps-use-uber-banned/.Google Scholar
• Filieri R (2016) What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Ann. Tourism Res. 48:46–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filieri R, Alguezaui S, McLeay F (2015) Why do travelers trust Tripadvisor? Tourism Management 51:174–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gee K (2017) New in Bumble’s dating app: Swipe right for business contacts. Wall Street Journal (November 8), https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-in-bumbles-dating-app-swipe-right-for-business-contacts-1510153200.Google Scholar
• Geoffrion AM, Krishnan R (2003) E-business and management science: Mutual impacts (part 1 of 2). Management Sci. 49(10):1275–1286.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Horowitz D (2006) Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. J. Interactive Advertising 6(2):2–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham L (2017) Digital games market to see sales worth $100 billion this year: Research. CNBC Video Game News (February 15), https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/15/digital-games-market-to-see-sales-worth-100-billion-this-year-research.html.Google Scholar
• Hackett R (2017) Walmart and 9 food giants team up on IBM blockchain plans. Fortune (August 22), http://fortune.com/2017/08/22/walmart-blockchain-ibm-food-nestle-unilever-tyson-dole/.Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Piskorski MJ, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of search platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J. Internet Marketing 18(1):39–52.Google Scholar
• House of Lords (2016) Online platforms and the digital single market. Accessed January 5, 2018, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldeucom/129/129.pdf.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang L (2017) Simultaneous vs. sequential crowdsourcing contests. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Hu M, Li X, Shi M (2015) Product and pricing decisions in crowdfunding. Marketing Sci. 34(3):331–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2016) The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Jin C, Hosanagar K, Veeraraghavan SK (2018) Do ratings cut both ways? Impact of bilateral ratings on platforms. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2017) Designing incentives to scale marketplaces. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2017) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms: Restricting agents' actions. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
• Kickstarter (2018) Kickstarter stats. Accessed May 28, 2018, https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats.Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2018) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2473–2972.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalır İE (2018) Contest among contest organizers. Working paper, University College London, London.Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Netessine S (2018) Market thickness and matching (in)efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Li J, Moreno A, Zhang DJ (2015) Agent behavior in the sharing economy: Evidence from Airbnb. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Luca M (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas L (2017) Questions over pace of growth as wechat nears 1bn users. Financial Times (August 23), https://www.ft.com/content/b557d6c8-8891-11e7-8bb1-5ba57d47eff7.Google Scholar
• Michail N, Teal G, Basta J, Austin KJ (2005) Internet information technology and “globalisation” redefining the meaning of information systems. Carrasquero JV, Welsch F, Oropeza A, Flueier T, Callaos N, eds. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Politics Inform. Systems: Tech. Appl. (IIIS, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing. 29:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen D (2018) Customer satisfaction at the push a button. New Yorker (February 5), https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/02/05/customer-satisfaction-at-the-push-of-a-button.Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne M, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution (Norton Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2016) Online reviews. Accessed December 19, 2016, http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/19/online-reviews/.Google Scholar
• Riquelme C, Banerjee S, Johari R (2015) Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queuing theoretic approach. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
• Roma P, Gal-Or E, Chen RR (2018) Reward-based crowdfunding campaigns: Informational value and access to venture capital. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):525–777.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudder C (2010) Why you should never pay for online dating. OkCupid. Accessed June 3, 2018, http://static.izs.me/why-you-should-never-pay-for-online-dating.html.Google Scholar
• Safronova V (2017) Instagram is now a dating platform, too. Here’s how it works. New York Times (December 21), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/style/instagram-thirst-traps-dating-breakups.html.Google Scholar
• Scheiber N (2017) How Uber uses psychological tricks to push its drivers’ buttons. New York Times (April 2), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Schwartz B (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (Harper Perennial, New York).Google Scholar
• Slater D (2013) Love in the Time of Algorithms: What Technology Does to Meeting and Dating (Current, New York).Google Scholar
• Stevens L, Emont J (2018) How sellers trick Amazon to boost sales. Wall Street Journal (July 28), https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-sellers-trick-amazon-to-boost-sales-1532750493.Google Scholar
• Stouras K, Girotra K, Netessine S (2014) Liveops Inc.: The Contact Centre Reinvented. INSEAD Business School Case 6097 (Harvard Business Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Strausz R (2017) A theory of crowdfunding: A mechanism design approach with demand uncertainty and moral hazard. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(6):1430–1476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS (2012) How Groupon can avert death. UCLA Global Supply Chain Blog. Accessed June 8, 2018, http://blogs.anderson.ucla.edu/global-supply-chain/2012/10/how-groupon-can-avert-death-2.html.Google Scholar
• Tang CS, Yoo O (2018) Peak period pricing strategies. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Taylor T (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):601–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Choudary SP (2016) 6 Reasons platforms fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. 31(March):62–76.Google Scholar
• Van Dijck J (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veiga A, Weyl EG, White A (2017) Multidimensional platform design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):191–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Armstrong P 2017. Is Alibaba doing enough to fight fakes? Forbes (March 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/ywang/2017/03/10/is-alibaba-doing-enough-to-fight-fakes/#2c963ffa5587.Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Hu M (2014) Committed vs. contingent pricing under competition. Production Oper. Management 23(11):1919–1936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten J, Ulrich K (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright J (2004) One-sided logic in two-sided markets. Rev. Network Econom. 3(1):44–64.Google Scholar
• Wu SD (2004) Supply chain intermediation: A bargaining theoretic framework. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZJ, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (Kluwer, London), 67–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Chen YJ, Tang CS (2017) Knowledge sharing and learning among smallholders in developing economies: Implications, incentives, and reward mechanisms. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Yoo KH, Gretzel U (2008) What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews? Inform. Tech. Tourism 10(4):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu J, Shen M, Tang CS (2017) Should on-demand ride services be regulated? An analysis of Chinese government policies. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Zachary GP (2008) “The Amazing Race,” as played in the laboratory. New York Times (March 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/technology/16ping.html.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Furr N (2016) Products to platforms: Making the leap. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(4):72–78.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang M (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar