Is Diversity (Un-)Biased? Project Selection Decisions in Executive Committees

References

• Arrowsmith J (2011) Trial watch: Phase II and phase III attrition rates 2008-2010. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 10(5):328–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austen-Smith D, Banks JS (1996) Information aggregation, rationality, and the condorcet jury theorem. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 90(1):34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battaglini M, Morton RB, Palfrey TR (2008) Information aggregation and strategic abstention in large laboratory elections. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):194–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battaglini M, Morton RB, Palfrey TR (2010) The swing voter’s curse in the laboratory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behnke N, Hueltenschmidt N (2010) Changing Pharmas Innovation DNA (Bain and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Burke JF, Sussman JB, Kent DM, Hayward RA (2015) Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses. BMJ 351(8032):20.Google Scholar
• Chao RO, Lichtendahl KC, Grushka-Cockayne Y (2014) Incentives in a stage-gate process. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1286–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen M, Knudsen T (2010) Design of decision-making organizations. Management Sci. 56(1):71–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Cook D, Brown D, Alexander R, March R, Morgan P, Satterthwaite G, Pangalos MN (2014) Lessons learned from the fate of astrazeneca’s drug pipeline: A five-dimensional framework. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 13(6):419–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG (2009) How companies are reinventing their idea-to-launch methodologies. Res. Tech. Management 52(2):47–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coughlan PJ (2000) In defense of unanimous jury verdicts: Mistrials, communication, and strategic voting. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(2):375–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Kahwajy JL, Bourgeois LJ (1997) Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. Calif. Management Rev. 39(2):42–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W (1997) Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private information. Econometrica 65(5):1029–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR (1998) The problem of cogent subgroups: A clinicostatistical tragedy. J. Clinical Epidemiology 51(4):297–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerardi D (2000) Jury verdicts and preference diversity. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(2):395–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerling K, Grüner HP, Kiel A, Schulte E (2005) Information acquisition and decision making in committees: A survey. Eur. J. Political Econom. 21(3):563–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2007) Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. 53(9):1452–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Yariv L (2011) An experimental study of collective deliberation. Econometrica 79(3):893–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guarnaschelli S, McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (2000) An experimental study of jury decision rules. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(2):407–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hao Li, Suen W (2009) Viewpoint: Decision-making in committees. Canadian J. Econom. 42(2):359–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huchzermeier A, Loch CH (2001) Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. 47(1):85–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Strick EP (2010) Glaxosmithkline: Reorganizing drug discovery (a). Case no. 9-605-074, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Sommer SC (2009) The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. 55(12):1899–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy G (2007) Decision making in committees: Transparency, reputation, and voting rules. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):150–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C, Kavadias S (2011) Implementing strategy through projects. Morris PWG, Pinto J, Söderlund J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Project Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 224–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C, Thomke S (2001) Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. 47(5):663–678.Link, Google Scholar
• Pangalos M (2016) Personal communication with Dr. Mene Pangalos, January 22, 2016.Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic systems: Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1988) Committees, hierarchies and polyarchies. Econom. J. 98(391):451–470.Google Scholar
• Schlapp J, Oraiopoulos N, Mak V (2015) Resource allocation decisions under imperfect evaluation and organizational dynamics. Management Sci. 61(9):2139–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Tollman P, Panier V, Dosik D, Cuss F, Paul B (2016) Unlocking Productivity in Biopharmaceutical R&D: The Key to Outperforming (The Boston Consulting Group, Boston).Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Mell JN (2016) Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 136:135–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar