Nonbinding Goals in Teams: A Real Effort Coordination Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0793

References

  • Ainslie G (1992) Picoeconomics: The Interaction of Successive Motivational States Within the Person (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Argyres N (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 11(1):109–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Wang X, Loewenstein G (1996) Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bornstein G, Gneezy U, Nagel R (2002) The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 41(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bortolotti S, Devetag G, Ortmann A (2016) Group incentives or individual incentives? A real-effort weak-link experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 56:60–73.Google Scholar
  • Brandts J, Cooper D, Fatas E (2011) Stand by me—Help, heterogeneity, and commitment in experimental coordination games. Management Sci. 62(10):2916–2936.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan J, Simchi-Levi D (2000) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. 46(3):436–443.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R, DeJong D, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Hernán-González R (2014) Don’t ask me if you will not listen: The dilemma of consultative participation. Management Sci. 60(3):560–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, Hernán-González R (2015) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, Hernán-González R (2018) Goal setting in the principal agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance. Games Econom. Behav. 109(May):311–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton PS, Gonzalez V, Noussair CN (2016) Self-chosen goals: Incentives and gender differences. CentER Discussion Paper 2016-0936, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 18(1):105–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devetag G, Ortmann A (2007) Experiments in solving coordination problems. Webster M Jr, Sell J, eds. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences (Elsevier, London), 407–432.Google Scholar
  • Dickinson D, Villeval MC (2008) Does monitoring decrease work effort? The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games Econom. Behav. 63(1):56–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doerr K, Mitchell T, Klastorin T, Brown K (1996) Impact of material flow policies and goals on job outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 81(2):142–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan J, Kwasnica A, Thomas D (2018) Paying for teamwork: Supplier coordination with endogenously selected groups. Production Oper. Management 27(6):1089–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Herz H, Wilkening T (2013) The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1325–1359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerchak Y, Wang Y (2004) Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production Oper. Management 13(1):23–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goerg SJ, Kube S (2012) Goals (th)at work—Goals, monetary incentives, and workers’ performance. MPI Collective Goods Preprint 2012/19, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Gómez-Miñambres J (2012) Motivation through goal setting. J. Econom. Psych. 33(6):1223–1239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C, Larrick R, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman M, Kahn LB, Li D (2018) Discretion in hiring. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):765–800.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiaw A (2013) Goal-setting and self-control. J. Econom. Theory 148(2):601–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2014) Coordination in games with strategic complementarities: An experiment on fixed vs. random matching. Production Oper. Management 23(2):221–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamenica E (2012) Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Rev. Econom. 4(1):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knez M, Camerer CF (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in weakest-link games. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):101–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):86–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Choo AS (2006) Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams. J. Oper. Management 24(6):779–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E, Latham G (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer C, Babcock L (1993) Self-serving assessments of fairness and pretrial bargaining. J. Legal Stud. 22(1):135–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shokoohyar S, Qi A, Katok E (2017) Project management under risk-sharing contracts. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
  • Smith V (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
  • Smithers S (2015) Goals, motivation and gender. Econom. Lett. 131(June):75–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
  • Vranceanu R, El Ouardighi F, Dubart D (2015) Team production with punishment option: Insights from a real-effort experiment. Management Decision Econom. 36(6):408–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RA (2006) Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):114–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu G, Heath C, Larrick R (2008) A prospect theory model of goal behavior. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.