Nonbinding Goals in Teams: A Real Effort Coordination Experiment
Published Online:9 Sep 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0793
References
- (1992) Picoeconomics: The Interaction of Successive Motivational States Within the Person (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 11(1):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 41(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Group incentives or individual incentives? A real-effort weak-link experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 56:60–73.Google Scholar
- (2011) Stand by me—Help, heterogeneity, and commitment in experimental coordination games. Management Sci. 62(10):2916–2936.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
- (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. 46(3):436–443.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Don’t ask me if you will not listen: The dilemma of consultative participation. Management Sci. 60(3):560–585.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Goal setting in the principal agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance. Games Econom. Behav. 109(May):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Self-chosen goals: Incentives and gender differences. CentER Discussion Paper 2016-0936, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 18(1):105–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Experiments in solving coordination problems. Webster M Jr, Sell J, eds. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences (Elsevier, London), 407–432.Google Scholar
- (2008) Does monitoring decrease work effort? The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games Econom. Behav. 63(1):56–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Impact of material flow policies and goals on job outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 81(2):142–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Paying for teamwork: Supplier coordination with endogenously selected groups. Production Oper. Management 27(6):1089–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production Oper. Management 13(1):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Goals (th)at work—Goals, monetary incentives, and workers’ performance. MPI Collective Goods Preprint 2012/19, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2012) Motivation through goal setting. J. Econom. Psych. 33(6):1223–1239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Discretion in hiring. Quart. J. Econom. 133(2):765–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Goal-setting and self-control. J. Econom. Theory 148(2):601–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Coordination in games with strategic complementarities: An experiment on fixed vs. random matching. Production Oper. Management 23(2):221–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Rev. Econom. 4(1):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in weakest-link games. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):101–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams. J. Oper. Management 24(6):779–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Self-serving assessments of fairness and pretrial bargaining. J. Legal Stud. 22(1):135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Project management under risk-sharing contracts. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
- (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
- (2015) Goals, motivation and gender. Econom. Lett. 131(June):75–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
- (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
- (2015) Team production with punishment option: Insights from a real-effort experiment. Management Decision Econom. 36(6):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A prospect theory model of goal behavior. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar

