Sustainable Operations Management Through the Perspective of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0804

References

  • Aflaki S, Netessine S (2017) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):489–507.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angell LC, Klassen RD (1999) Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: An agenda for research in operations management. J. Oper. Management 17(5):575–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal VV, Ülkü S (2012) The role of modular upgradability as a green design strategy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):640–648.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN (2019) OM forum—New opportunities for operations management research in sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  • Al-Gwaiz M, Chao X, Wu OQ (2016) Understanding how generation flexibility and renewable energy affect power market competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):114–131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ata B, Lee D, Tongarlak MH (2012) Optimizing organic waste to energy operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):231–244.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A, ed. (2016) Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A (2019) Operational perspectives on extended producer responsibility. J. Indust. Ecology 23(4):744–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bastani H, de Zegher JF (2019) Do policies with limited enforcement reduce harm? Evidence from transshipment bans. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Bellos I, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2017) The car sharing economy: Interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):185–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blass V, Corbett CJ (2018) Same supply chain, different models: Integrating perspectives from life cycle assessment and supply chain management. J. Indust. Ecology 22(1):18–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo JC, Tan T, eds. (2017) Sustainable Supply Chains: A Research-Based Textbook on Operations and Strategy, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 4 (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calmon AP, Graves SC (2017) Inventory management in a consumer electronics closed-loop supply chain. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(4):568–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Chintapalli P, Rajaram K, Tang CS (2018) Improving supplier compliance through joint and shared audits with collective penalty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):363–380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Corbett CJ, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chu LY, Li G, Rusmevichientong P (2018) Optimal pricing and inventory planning with charitable donations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):687–703.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ (2006) Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(4):330–350.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Klassen RD (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):5–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Kleindorfer PR (2001a) Environmental management and operations management: Introduction to part 1 (manufacturing and ecologistics). Production Oper. Management 10(2):107–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Kleindorfer PR (2001b) Environmental management and operations: Introduction to part 2 (integrating operations and environmental management systems). Production Oper. Management 10(3):225–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Kleindorfer PR (2003) Environmental management and operations management: Introduction to the third special issue. Production Oper. Management 12(3):287–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawande M, Gavirneni S, Mehrotra M, Mookerjee V (2013) Efficient distribution of water between head-reach and tail-end farms in developing countries. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):221–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Zegher JF, Iancu DA, Lee HL (2019) Designing contracts and sourcing channels to create shared value. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):271–289.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, van Wassenhove LN, eds. (2004) Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chains (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demeester L, Eichler K, Loch CH (2004) Organic production systems: what the biological cell can teach us about manufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):115–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Demeester L, Qi M, Van Wassenhove LN (2013) Plant networks for processing recyclable materials. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):670–688.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drake DF (2018) Carbon tariffs: Effects in settings with technology choice and foreign production cost advantage. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):667–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drake DF, Spinler S (2013) OM forum—Sustainable operations management: An enduring stream or a passing fancy? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):689–700.Google Scholar
  • Ferguson M, Guide VDR Jr, Souza GC (2006) Supply chain coordination for false failure returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(4):376–393.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, Van der Laan E, Van Nunen JA, Van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 103(1):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu W, Kalkanci B, Subramanian R (2019) Are hazardous substance rankings effective? An empirical investigation of information dissemination about the relative hazards of chemicals and emissions reductions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):602–619.Google Scholar
  • Girotra K, Netessine S (2013) OM forum—Business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):537–544.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2001) Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management 10(2):142–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Business Aspects of Closed-Loop Supply Chains (Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
  • Guide VDR Jr, Teunter RH, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(4):303–316.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman AJ, Corbett CJ, Joglekar N, Wells P (2014) Industrial ecology as a source of competitive advantage. J. Indust. Ecol. 18(5):597–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu S, Souza GC, Ferguson ME, Wang W (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency: Data granularity matters! Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):480–494.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jira C, Toffel MW (2013) Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):559–577.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalkanci B, Rahmani M, Toktay LB (2019) The role of “inclusive innovation” in promoting social sustainability. Production Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Sustainable operations management. Production Oper. Management 14(4):482–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraft T, Zheng Y, Erhun F (2013) The NGO’s dilemma: How to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):649–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Operational compliance levers, environmental performance, and firm performance under cap and trade regulation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):186–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D (2012) Turning waste into by-product. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):115–127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H, ed. (2019) “Value Chain Innovations in Developing Economies.” Special issue, Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):251–477.Google Scholar
  • Liao C-N, Chen Y-J, Tang CS (2019) Information provision policies for improving farmer welfare in developing countries: Heterogeneous farmers and market selection. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):254–270.Google Scholar
  • Lim MK, Mak HY, Rong Y (2015) Toward mass adoption of electric vehicles: impact of the range and resale anxieties. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):101–119.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Mishra A, Goldstein S, Sinha KK (2019) Toward improving factory working conditions in developing countries: An empirical analysis of Bangladesh ready-made garment factories. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):379–397.Google Scholar
  • Lo CK, Tang CS, Zhou Y, Yeung AC, Fan D (2018) Environmental incidents and the market value of firms: An empirical investigation in the Chinese context. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):422–439.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lund RT (1996) The Remanufacturing Industry: Hidden Giant (Boston University, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Malloy T, Trump BD, Linkov I (2016) Risk-based and prevention-based governance for emerging materials. Environ. Sci. Tech. 50(13):6822–6824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mani V, Muthulingam S (2019) Does learning from inspections affect environmental performance? Evidence from unconventional well development in Pennsylvania. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):177–197.Google Scholar
  • Murali K, Lim MK, Petruzzi NC (2019) The effects of ecolabels and environmental regulation on green product development. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):519–535.Google Scholar
  • Muthulingam S, Corbett CJ, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Örsdemir A, Deshpande V, Parlaktürk AK (2019) Is servicization a win-win strategy? Profitability and environmental implications of servicization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):674–691.Google Scholar
  • Pinçe Ç, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2016) Extracting maximum value from consumer returns: Allocating between remarketing and refurbishing for warranty claims. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(4):475–492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL (2013) OM forum—Operations management challenges for some “cleantech” firms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):527–536.Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Ramdas K (2019) Social responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2013) On the value of input efficiency, capacity efficiency, and the flexibility to rebalance them. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):630–639.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2016) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):184–197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Toktay LB, eds. (2013) “Special Issue on the Environment.” Special issue, Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):523–700.Google Scholar
  • Privett N, Erhun F (2011) Efficient funding: Auditing in the nonprofit sector. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):471–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qi W, Li L, Liu S, Shen ZJM (2018) Shared mobility for last-mile delivery: Design, operational prescriptions, and environmental impact. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):737–751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ray S, Boyaci T, Aras N (2005) Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(3):208–228.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Cleaner Production 16(15):1699–1710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC (2009) Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated demand-supply model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):577–594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Subramanian R, Subramanyam R (2012) Key factors in the market for remanufactured products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):315–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sunar N, Plambeck E (2016) Allocating emissions among co-products: Implications for procurement and climate policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):414–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turcheniuk K, Bondarev D, Singhal V, Yushin G (2018) Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries. Nature 559(7715):467–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uppari BS, Popescu I, Netessine S (2019) Selling off-grid light to liquidity-constrained consumers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):308–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Ferguson ME, Hu S, Souza GC (2013) Dynamic capacity investment with two competing technologies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):616–629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu OQ, Kapuscinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):578–595.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yu JJ, Tang CS, Shen ZJM (2018) Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: Subsidizing consumers or manufacturers? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):752–766.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang F, Zhang R (2018) Trade-in remanufacturing, customer purchasing behavior, and government policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):601–616.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou SX, Tao Z, Chao X (2011) Optimal control of inventory systems with multiple types of remanufacturable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(1):20–34.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.