Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0828

References

  • Abbey JD, Meloy MG, Guide VDR Jr, Atalay S (2015) Remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains for consumer goods. Production Oper. Management 24(3):488–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal VV, Atasu A, van Ittersum K (2015) Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers’ perceived value of new products. Management Sci. 61(1):60–72.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allon G, Kremer M (2019) Behavioral foundations of queueing systems. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 325–366.Google Scholar
  • Baron O, Hu M, Najafi-Asadolahi S, Qian Q (2015) Newsvendor selling to loss-averse consumers with stochastic reference points. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):456–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Osadchiy N, Ovchinnikov A (2017) Behavioral anomalies in consumer wait-or-buy decisions and their implications for markdown management. Oper. Res. 65(2):357–378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2008) Decision biases in revenue management: Some behavioral evidence. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):625–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker-Peth M, Thonemann U (2019) Behavioral inventory decisions: The newsvendor and other inventory settings. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 393–432.Google Scholar
  • Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beer R, Ahn HS, Leider S (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. 64(9):3974–3994.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beil D, Leider S, Li J (2018) Team decision making in operations management. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  • Benzion U, Cohen Y, Peled R, Shavit T (2008) Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: An experimental study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(9):1281–1287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitran GR, Ferrer JC, Rocha e Oliveira P (2008) OM Forum. Managing customer experiences: Perspectives on the temporal aspects of service encounters. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(1):61–83.Google Scholar
  • Bolton G, Katok E (2008) Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G, Ockenfels A, Thonemann U (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) The newsvendor “pull-to-center effect”: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):590–608.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau J, Hopp W, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2019) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice: Evidence from the field and lab. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay CJ (2017) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buell RW, Mariadassou S, Zheng Y (2019) Relative performance transparency: Effects on sustainable choices. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Chen KY, Wu DY (2019) Buyer-supplier interactions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 325–366.Google Scholar
  • Chen KY, Kaya M, Özer Ö (2008) Dual sales channel management with service competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):654–675.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X (2012) Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium. Management Sci. 58(10):1952–1962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi EW, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2019) Network trust and trust behaviors among executives in supply chain interactions. Working paper, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  • Cohen MC, Leung NHZ, Panchamgam K, Perakis G, Smith A (2017) The impact of linear optimization on promotion planning. Oper. Res. 65(2):446–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen-Hillel T, Panchamgam K, Perakis G (2019a) Bounded memory peak end models can be surprisingly good. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Cohen-Hillel T, Panchamgam K, Perakis G (2019b) High-low promotion policies for peak-end demand models. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui TH, Zhang Y (2018) Cognitive hierarchy in capacity allocation games. Management Sci. 64(3):1250–1270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis AM, Hyndman K (2019) Multidimensional bargaining and inventory risk in supply chains: An experimental study. Management Sci. 65(3):1286–1304.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Zegher JF, Iancu DA, Plambeck EL (2018) Sustaining rainforests and smallholders by eliminating payment delay in a commodity supply chain—it takes a village. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Donohue K, Schultz K (2019) The future is bright: Recent trends and emerging topics in behavioral operations. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 619–651.Google Scholar
  • Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S (2019) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ebrahim-Khanjari N, Hopp W, Iravani SMR (2012) Trust and information sharing in supply chains. Production Oper. Management 21(3):444–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flicker B (2019) Managerial insight and “optimal” algorithms. Working paper, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  • Gans N, Koole G, Mandelbaum A (2003) Telephone call centers: Tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(2):79–141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garnett O, Mandelbaum A, Reiman M (2002) Designing a call center with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 4(3):208–227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):676–691.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopalakrishnan R, Doroudi S, Ward AR, Wierman A (2016) Routing and staffing when servers are strategic. Oper. Res. 64(4):1033–1050.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurnani H, Ramachandran K, Ray S, Xia Y (2014) Ordering behavior under supply risk: An experimental investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(1):61–75.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ha AY, Tang CS (2017) Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management (Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Basel, Switzerland).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E, Katok E, Pavlov V (2019) Bargaining process and channel efficiency. Working paper, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  • Ho TH, Zhang J (2008) Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang T, Allon G, Bassamboo A (2013) Bounded rationality in service systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):263–279.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang T, Yin Z, Chen YJ (2017) Managing posterior price matching: The role of customer boundedly rational expectations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):385–402.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2013) Aligning capacity decisions in supply chains when demand forecasts are private information: Theory and experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):102–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Inderfurth K, Sadrieh A, Voigt G (2013) The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 22(2):410–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katok E, Wu DY (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katok E, Thomas D, Davis A (2008) Inventory service-level agreements as coordination mechanisms: The effect of review periods. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):609–624.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Scholtes S, Terweisch C (2019) Empirical research in healthcare operations: Past research, present understanding, and future opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keskinocak P, Savva N (2019) A review of the healthcare-management (modeling) literature published in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kostami V, Ward AR (2009) Managing service systems with an offline waiting option and customer abandonment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):644–656.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer M, Minner S, Wassenhove LNV (2010) Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):673–681.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee YS, Siemsen E (2017) Task decomposition and newsvendor decision making. Management Sci. 63(10):3226–3245.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2016) Bargaining in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(10):3039–3058.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Subramanian U, Özer Ö (2019) Are we strategically naive or guided by trust and trustworthiness in cheap-talk communication? Working paper, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
  • Liu N, Ziya S, Kulkarni VG (2010) Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(2):347–364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Mishra A, Goldstein S, Sinha KK (2019) Toward improving factory working conditions in developing countries: An empirical analysis of Bangladesh ready-made garment factories. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):379–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Long X, Nasiry J (2015) Prospect theory explains newsvendor behavior: The role of reference points. Management Sci. 61(12):3009–3012.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Y, Musalem A, Olivares M, Schilkrut A (2013) Measuring the effect of queues on customer purchases. Management Sci. 59(8):1743–1763.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moon K, Bimpikis K, Mendelson H (2017) Randomized markdowns and online monitoring. Management Sci. 64(3):1271–1290.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moritz B, Narayanan A, Parker C (2019) Unraveling behavioral ordering: Relative costs and the bullwhip effect. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  • Muthulingam S, Corbett C, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M, Shechter S (2014) Prospect theory and the newsvendor problem. Management Sci. 60(4):1057–1062.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nasiry J, Popescu I (2012) Advance selling when consumers regret. Management Sci. 58(6):1160–1177.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):943–951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ovchinnikov A (2011) Revenue and cost management for remanufactured products. Production Oper. Management 20(6):824–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ovchinnikov A (2019) Incorporating customer behavior into operational decisions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 587–617.Google Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2012) Behavioral issues in pricing management. Özer O, Phillips R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 415–461.Google Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2016) Markdown or everyday low price? The role of behavioral motives. Management Sci. 62(2):326–346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2017) Establishing trust and trustworthiness in supply chain information sharing. Ha AY, Tang CS, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management (Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Basel, Switzerland), 287–312.Google Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2019) Trust and trustworthiness. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 489–523.Google Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Subramanian U, Wang Y (2018) Information sharing, advice provision or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Sci. 64(1):474–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y, Croson R (2013) Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Sci. 59(11):2502–2517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scheele LM, Thonemann UW, Slikker M (2018) Designing incentive systems for truthful forecast information sharing within a firm. Management Sci. 64(8):3690–3713.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz KL, Juran DC, Boudreau JW (1999) The effects of low inventory on the development of productivity norms. Management Sci. 45(12):1664–1678.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz KL, Juran DC, Boudreau JW, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (1998) Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. 44(12-part-1):1595–1607.Google Scholar
  • Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Roth AV, Balasubramanian S, Anand G (2009) The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):429–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL (2015) The diseconomies of queue pooling: An empirical investigation of emergency department length of stay. Management Sci. 61(12):3032–3053.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spiliotopoulou E, Donohue K, Gürbüz MC (2016) Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production Oper. Management 25(3):548–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stangl T, Thonemann UW (2017) Equivalent inventory metrics: A behavioral perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):472–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X (2009) A model of consumer inertia with applications to dynamic pricing. Production Oper. Management 18(4):365–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tong J, Feiler D (2017) A behavioral model of forecasting: Naive statistics on mental samples. Management Sci. 63(11):3609–3627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL (2007) An empirical study of system improvement by frontline employees in hospital units. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):492–505.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitt W (1999) Improving service by informing customers about anticipated delays. Management Sci. 45(2):192–207.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Loch CH, der Heyden LV (2008) A model of fair process and its limits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):637–653.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui TH (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.