Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms Under Demand and Supply Congestion Effects

References

• Afèche P , Liu Z , Maglaras C (2018) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Ambrus A , Argenziano R (2009) Asymmetric networks in two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 1(1):17–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antczak S (2017) 11 things to know before becoming an Uber or Lyft driver. Forbes (April 23), https://www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2017/04/23/11-things-to-know-before-becoming-an-uber-or-lyft-driver/#4be277336579.Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M , Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econom. Theory 32(2):353–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J , Tang CS (2018) Can two competing on-demand service platforms be both profitable? Working paper, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.Google Scholar
• Bai J , So KC , Tang CS , Chen X , Wang H (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S , Bernhard H , Courcoubetis C (2017) Drivers, riders and service providers: The impact of the sharing economy on mobility. Conitzer V , Guérin R , eds. Proc. 12th Workshop Econom. Networks, Systems Comput. (ACM, New York), 1–6.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S , Ding J-Y , Kong G , Taylor T (2018) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Besbes O , Castro F , Lobel I (2018) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Working paper, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K , Candogan O , Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Google Scholar
• Cachon GP , Daniels KM , Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B , Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MK , Sheldon M (2015) Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Chen L , Mislove A , Wilson C (2015) Peeking beneath the hood of Uber. Proc. 2015 Internet Measurement Conf. (ACM, New York), 495–508.Google Scholar
• Choi JP (2010) Tying in two-sided markets with multi-homing. J. Indust. Econom. 58(3):607–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook J , Price R (2018) Uber’s CEO said that it could be profitable—It just doesn’t want to be right now. Business Insider (February 15), http://www.businessinsider.com/uber-ceo-doesnt-want-profitable-2018-2.Google Scholar
• David J (2016) Uber hammered by price gouging accusations during NYC’s explosion. CNBC (September 18), https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/18/uber-hammered-by-price-gouging-accusations-during-nycs-explosion.html.Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos N (2015) How Uber surge pricing really works. Washington Post (April 17), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/04/17/how-uber-surge-pricing-really-works/?utm_term=.3f3c86682e30.Google Scholar
• Feng G , Kong G , Wang Z (2017) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Fink E (2014) Uber threatens drivers: Do not work for Lyft. Innovation Nation (blog), August 5, http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/04/technology/uber-lyft/index.html.Google Scholar
• Global Times (2016) Did Didi change pricing method for drivers? Media reports say “maybe.” (August 18), http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1001358.shtml.Google Scholar
• Guda H , Subramanian U (2017) Strategic surge pricing and forecast communication on on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
• Gurvich I , Lariviere M , Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy (Springer, Cham), 249–278.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall J , Kendrick C , Nosko C (2015) The effects of Uber’s surge pricing: A case study. Working paper, Uber Technologies, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Hu M , Zhou Y (2017) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Johari R , Weintraub GY , Van Roy B (2010) Investment and market structure in industries with congestion. Oper. Res. 58(5):1303–1317.Link, Google Scholar
• Knowledge@Wharton (2017) Growth vs. profits: Uber’s cash burn dilemma. Accessed February 18, 2020, http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/growth-vs-profits-ubers-cash-burn-dilemma/.Google Scholar
• Lowrey A (2014) Is Uber’s surge-pricing an example of high-tech gouging? New York Times (January 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/12/magazine/is-ubers-surge-pricing-an-example-of-high-tech-gouging.html.Google Scholar
• Lyft (2018) Lyft’s fees. Accessed August 29, 2018, https://help.lyft.com/hc/en-us/articles/115012927407.Google Scholar
• Nikzad A (2018) Thickness and competition in ride-sharing markets. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Özkan E , Ward A (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Google Scholar
• RideGuru (2018) Driver earnings, payout & take-home. Accessed August 29, 2018, https://ride.guru/content/resources/driver-payout-take-home.Google Scholar
• Riquelme C , Banerjee S , Johari R (2015) Pricing in ride-share platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C , Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C , Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman L (2017) Why can’t Uber make money? Forbes (December 14), https://www.forbes.com/sites/lensherman/2017/12/14/why-cant-uber-make-money/2/#7ec15a494a24.Google Scholar
• Siddiq A , Taylor T (2019) Ride-hailing platforms: Competition and autonomous vehicles. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Taylor T (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Uber (2018) How surge pricing works. Accessed August 29, 2018, https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/partner-app/how-surge-works/.Google Scholar
• Wilhelm A (2017) Unpacking Lyft’s projected financials. TechCrunch (November 14), https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/14/unpacking-lyfts-projected-financials/unpacking-lyfts-projected-financials/.Google Scholar