Impacts of Counterfeiting on a Global Supply Chain
Published Online:11 Dec 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0912
References
- (2008) Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Bus. Horizons 51(3):191–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Consumer “accomplices” in product counterfeiting: A demand side investigation. J. Consumer Marketing 10(4):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
- China Daily (2017) Fighting China’s counterfeits in the online era. China Daily (September 19), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-09/19/content_32200290.htm.Google Scholar
- (2015) Combating strategic counterfeiters in licit and illicit supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. 41(2):209–225.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
- Economist, The (2009) Moving on up. The Economist (March 27), Vertical integration, http://www.economist.com/node/13173671.Google Scholar
- Economist, The (2013) Brand value. The Economist (May 13), Focus, http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2013/05/focus-5.Google Scholar
- Federal Trade Commission (2020) Manufacturer-imposed requirements. Accessed December 2, 2020, https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/dealings-supply-chain/manufacturer-imposed.Google Scholar
- (2017) Entry of copycats of luxury brands. Marketing Sci. 36(2):272–289.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) On the use of overt anti-counterfeiting technologies. Marketing Sci. 37(3):403–424.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing 59(1):29–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988a) Counterfeit-product trade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):59–75.Google Scholar
- (1988b) Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) How much anti-piracy effort is too much? A study of the global software industry. Working paper, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
- (2008) Potential competition, limit pricing, and price elevation from exclusionary contract. Issues in Competition Law and Policy (ABA Publishing, Chicago), 433–448.Google Scholar
- (2001) The nightmare of international product piracy: Exploring defensive strategies. Indust. Marketing Management 30(6):499–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) The effects of attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to buy pirated CDs: The case of Chinese consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 47(3):223–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Sci. 59(1):245–264.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) Gaining retailers’ assistance in fighting counterfeiting: Conceptualization and empirical test of a helping model. J. Retailing 68(1):90–109.Google Scholar
- Pinsent Masons (2017) Recommending and agreeing retail prices: The limits under competition law. Out-Law Guide (August 16), http://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/recommending-and-agreeing-retail-prices-competition-law-puts-limits-on-how-far-you-can-go.Google Scholar
- (2017) Competing with copycats when customers are strategic. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):403–418.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1577–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Brand management and strategies against counterfeits. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Untangling searchable and experiential quality responses to counterfeits. Marketing Sci. 34(4):522–538.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Conspicuous consumption and dynamic pricing. Marketing Sci. 35(5):786–804.Link, Google Scholar
- Retail News Insider (2018) Exposing e-commerce counterfeits—A threat to retailers and brands. Retail News Insider (April 3), https://www.flipsnack.com/Interactions/daymon-retail-news-insider-april-2018.html.Google Scholar
- (2009) The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. Accessed December 2, 2020, http://www.ipr-policy.eu/media/pts/1/04_Scorpecci,_The_Economic_Impact_of_Counterfeiting_and_Piracy.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2013) Consumer heterogeneity, product quality, and distribution channels. Management Sci. 59(5):1162–1176.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) A strategic approach to software protection. J. Econom. Management Strategy 8(2):163–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Counterfeiting: silence of the brands hides fight against fakes. Financial Times (June 5), https://www.ft.com/content/89366414-8dad-11e0-a0c4-00144feab49a.Google Scholar
- (2010) Component-based technology transfer in the presence of potential imitators. Management Sci. 56(3):536–552.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):247–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand effect. Management Sci. 41(5):909–926.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Do counterfeits promote genuine products? PhD thesis, School of Business, Hofstra University, Long Island, NY.Google Scholar
- (2013) Vertical differentiation with variety-seeking customers. Management Sci. 59(2):390–401.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Supply chain structure in a market with deceptive counterfeits. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits. Ann. Oper. Res. 192(1):49–66.Crossref, Google Scholar

