That’s Not Fair: Tariff Structures for Electric Utilities with Rooftop Solar
Published Online:5 Jan 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0930
References
- (2016) Strategic investment in renewable energy sources: The effect of supply intermittency. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):489–507.Google Scholar
- (2015) A model for residential adoption of photovoltaic systems. 2015 IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting (IEEE, New York), 1–5.Google Scholar
- (2019) Non-ownership business models for solar energy. Research Paper 3375372, Georgetown McDonough School of Business, Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Understanding how generation flexibility and renewable energy affect power market competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):114–131.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1):52–66.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Grid-connected distributed generation: Compensation mechanism basics. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2020) Promoting solar panel investments: Feed-in-tariff vs. tax-rebate policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1148–1164.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Adoption of residential solar power under uncertainty: Implications for renewable energy incentives. Energy Policy 86:27–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Regulatory considerations associated with the expanded adoption of distributed solar. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-60613, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Sci. 31(6):900–912.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Net energy metering: Subsidy issues and regulatory solutions. Report, Institute for Electric Innovation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2014) Valuation of distributed solar: A qualitative view. Electricity J 27(10):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Designing compensation for distributed solar generation: Is net metering ever optimal? Energy J. 38(3):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Who owns the sun? Bloomberg (January 28), http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-solar-power-buffett-vs-musk/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Impact of residential PV adoption on retail electricity rates. Energy Policy 62:830–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
- California Public Utilities Commission (2020) California Public Utilities Commission. Accessed January 8, 2020, http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/.Google Scholar
- (2015) Buffett’s utility wins as sun sets on Nevada home solar subsidy. Bloomberg (December 21), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-21/buffett-s-utility-wins-as-sun-sets-on-nevada-home-solar-subsidy.Google Scholar
- (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Sci. 51(7):1120–1130.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Electric utilities death spiral: Hyperbole or reality? Electricity J. 27(10):7–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The impact of rate design and net metering on the bill savings from distributed PV for residential customers in California. Energy Policy 39(9):5243–5253.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Net metering and market feedback loops: Exploring the impact of retail rate design on distributed PV deployment. Appl. Energy 162:713–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The solar deployment system (SolarDS) model: Documentation and sample results. Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2013) Sensitivity of rooftop PV projections in the SunShot Vision Study to market assumptions. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-54620, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- Electricity Local (2019) United States map of electricity deregulation. Accessed January 8, 2020, https://www.electricitylocal.com/resources/deregulation/.Google Scholar
- Energy APS (2019) Available service plans. Accessed December 16, 2019, https://www.aps.com/en/Residential/Service-Plans/Compare-Service-Plans.Google Scholar
- Energy PNM (2018) Rates. Accessed February 2, 2018, https://www.pnm.com/rates.Google Scholar
- (2018) Q4 2017/Q1 2018 solar industry update. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Compensation for distributed solar: A survey of options to preserve stakeholder value. Report NREL/TP-6A20-62371, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2015) Distributed PV adoption in Maine through 2021. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2019) Optimal feed-in tariff policies: The impact of market structure and technology characteristics. Production Oper. Management 28(5):1108–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Google (2020) Google Project Sunroof. Accessed January 24, 2020, https://www.google.com/get/sunroof#p=0.Google Scholar
- (2015) Capacity investment in renewable energy technology with supply intermittency: Data granularity matters! Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):480–494.Link, Google Scholar
- IEA (2019) Distributed PV remuneration for forecast growth by segment, 2019-2024. Accessed December 9, 2019, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/distributed-pv-remuneration-for-forecast-growth-by-segment-2019-2024.Google Scholar
- (2013) A Regulator’s Guidebook: Calculating the Benefits and Costs of Distributed Solar Generation (Interstate Renewable Energy Council, Latham, NY).Google Scholar
- (2015) Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1):131–148.Google Scholar
- (2013) Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well (Regulatory Assistance Project, Montpelier, VT).Google Scholar
- (2011) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. MIT Sloan Research Paper 4872-11, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2017) Evolving distributed generation support mechanisms: Case studies from United States, Germany, United Kingdom, and Australia. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Indiana energy bill would eliminate net metering, move to buy-all, sell-all solar model. Midwestern Energy News (January 24), http://midwestenergynews.com/2017/01/24/indiana-energy-bill-would-eliminate-net-metering-move-to-buy-all-sell-all-solar-model/.Google Scholar
- (2015) SolarCity accounts for 1/3 of U.S. residential rooftop installations in 2015. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://cleantechnica.com/2015/12/29/solarcity-accounts-for-13-of-us-residential-rooftop-installations-in-2015/.Google Scholar
- (2016) The Sustainability of Net Metering (Electric Markets Research Foundation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
- (2017) US solar market grows 95% in 2016, smashes records. Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/us-solar-market-grows-95-in-2016-smashes-records#gs.qK=_kE4.Google Scholar
- North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (2017) Net metering program overview. Accessed December 4, 2019, http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program/detail/284.Google Scholar
- North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (2019) Net metering program overview. Accessed December 4, 2019, http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program/detail/42.Google Scholar
- North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center, Meister Consultants Group (2019) The 50 states of solar. Report, NC Clean Energy and Meister Consultants Group, Raleigh, NC. Google Scholar
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (2020) Residential and commercial ITC factsheets. Accessed January 24, 2020, https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/downloads/residential-and-commercial-itc-factsheets.Google Scholar
- (2010) The impacts of commercial electric utility rate structure elements on the economics of photovoltaic systems. Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.Google Scholar
- (2016) Nevada regulators restore retail-rate net metering in Sierra Pacific territory. Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/nevada-regulators-retore-retail-rate-net-metering-in-sierra-pacific-territo.Google Scholar
- (2013) Diffusion of environmentally-friendly energy technologies: Buy vs. lease differences in residential PV markets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8(1):014022.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Some reasons for the maximin criterion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 64(2):141–146.Google Scholar
- (2019) Why Tesla slashed its solar panel prices. Fortune (May 2), https://fortune.com/2019/05/02/tesla-solar-panels-price-cut/.Google Scholar
- (2005) Household electricity demand, revisited. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(3):853–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The structural impact of renewable portfolio standards and feed-in tariffs on electricity markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255(1):224–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017a) Is rooftop solar just a toy for the wealthy? Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/is-rooftop-solar-just-a-toy-for-the-wealthy/441373/.Google Scholar
- (2017b) Maine lawmakers fail to override governor’s veto of solar bill. Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/maine-lawmakers-fail-to-override-governors-veto-of-solar-bill/448550/.Google Scholar
- (2015) Quantifying the financial impacts of net-metered PV on utilities and ratepayers. Energy Policy 80:133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Cost of solar systems from SolarCity vs Sunrun & Vivint Solar, and cost per watt of solar sales/acquisition. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://cleantechnica.com/2016/07/19/cost-solarcity-solar-systems-vs-sunrun-vivint-solar-cost-per-watt-solar-salesacquisition/.Google Scholar
- (2016) The California duck curve is real, and bigger than expected. Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/the-california-duck-curve-is-real-and-bigger-than-expected#gs.jkJRpq0.Google Scholar
- State of Connecticut Public Utilities Commission (2018) Substitute Senate Bill No. 9. Accessed December 9, 2019, https://www.cga.ct.gov/2018/act/pa/pdf/2018PA-00050-R00SB-00009-PA.pdf.Google Scholar
- State of Maine (2019) Governor Mills signs legislation to restore net metering & incentivize growth of solar power in Maine. Accessed April 23, 2020, https://www.maine.gov/governor/mills/news/governor-mills-signs-legislation-restore-net-metering-incentivize-growth-solar-power-maine.Google Scholar
- State of Maine Public Utilities Commission (2017) Amendments to net energy billing rule. Accessed December 9, 2019, https://www.insourcerenewables.com/sites/default/files/993e4acc-029b-4ea4-a38a-885dec26e0cc-1.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2018) Strategic commitment to a production schedule with uncertain supply and demand: Renewable energy in day-ahead electricity markets. Management Sci.Google Scholar
- (2018) Net-metered distributed renewable energy: A peril for utilities? Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise Research Paper 18-24, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
- SunRun (2019) Power purchase agreement (PPA). Accessed January 9, 2020, https://www.sunrun.com/go-solar-center/solar-terms/definition/power-purchase-agreement.Google Scholar
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (2009) 2009 RECS survey data. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/.Google Scholar
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015) 2015 RECS survey data. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2015/.Google Scholar
- (1989) Price discrimination. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 597–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) New Mexico settlement blocks solar fees proposed by Xcel Energy. Accessed March 15, 2018, https://www.utilitydive.com/news/new-mexico-settlement-blocks-solar-fees-proposed-by-xcel-energy/424357/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):578–595.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Managing wind-based electricity generation in the presence of storage and transmission capacity. Production Oper. Management 28(4):970–989.Google Scholar

