Optimal Duration of Innovation Contests

References

• 99designs (2018) Create a powerful logo for tech start-up Perpetual Motion. Accessed May 1, 2020, https://99designs.co.uk/logo-design/contests/746439.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V , Hwang E , Tan Y (2020) Learning to be creative: A mutually exciting spatio-temporal point process model for idea generation in open innovation. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Ales L , Cho S-H , Körpeoğlu E (2017a) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Ales L , Cho S-H , Körpeoğlu E (2017b) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L , Cho S-H , Körpeoğlu E (2019) Innovation and crowdsourcing contests. Hu M, ed. Invited Book Chapter in Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand, vol. 6 (Springer, New York), 379–406.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM , DeJong W , Lepper MR (1976) Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Sociol. Psychol. 34(1):92–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM , Hadley CN , Kramer SJ (2002) Creativity under the gun. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(8):52–61.Google Scholar
• Ariely D , Zakay D (2001) A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychol. 108(2):187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K , Ehsani S , Mostagir M (2019) Designing dynamic contests. Oper. Res. 67(2):339–356.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ , Lakhani KR (2013) Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(4):60–69.Google Scholar
• Chao RO , Kavadias S (2008) A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Sci. 54(5):907–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Chao RO , Kavadias S , Gaimon C (2009) Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives, and new product development portfolio management. Management Sci. 55(9):1556–1569.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J , Dai T , Korpeoglu CG , Körpeoğlu E , Sahin O , Tang CS , Xiao S (2020) Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahan E , Mendelson H (2001) An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. 47(1):102–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P , Stiglitz J (1980) Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D. RAND J. Econom. 11(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Deng S-J , Elmaghraby W (2005) Supplier selection via tournaments. Production Oper. Management 14(2):252–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD , Chitkara AR (2006) The new practice of global product development. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(4):22–30.Google Scholar
• Erat S , Kavadias S (2008) Sequential testing of product designs: Implications for learning. Management Sci. 54(5):956–968.Link, Google Scholar
• Erat S , Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M , Wang L (2020) Joint vs. separate crowdsourcing contests. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH , Singh PV , Argote L (2019) Jack of all, master of some: Information network and innovation in crowdsourcing communities. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):389–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain A (2013) Learning by doing and the locus of innovative capability in biotechnology research. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1683–1700.Link, Google Scholar
• Judd KL , Schmedders K , Yeltekin Ş (2012) Optimal rules for patent races. Internat. Econom. Rev. 53(1):23–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalra A , Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim K-K , Lim MK (2015) R&D outsourcing in an innovation-driven supply chain. Oper. Res. Lett. 43(1):20–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E , Cho S-H (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E , Korpeoglu CG , Hafalır IE (2017) Parallel innovation contests. Working Paper, University College London.Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P , Milner J , Tian Z (2017) Clinical trials for new drug development: Optimal investment and application. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):437–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Lang M , Seel C , Strack P (2014) Deadlines in stochastic contests. J. Math. Econom. 52:134–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T , Wilde LL (1980) Market structure and innovation: A reformulation. Quart. J. Econom. 94(2):429–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH , Terwiesch C , Thomke S (2001) Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. 47(5):663–678.Link, Google Scholar
• Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 93(3):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J , Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management. Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Moscarini G , Smith L (2001) The optimal level of experimentation. Econometrica 69(6):1629–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nittala L , Krishnan V (2016) Designing internal innovation contests. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Seel C (2018) Contests with endogenous deadlines. J. Econom. Management Strategy 27(1):119–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segev E (2020) Crowdsourcing contests. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 281(2):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao B , Shi L , Xu B , Liu L (2012) Factors affecting participation of solvers in crowdsourcing: An empirical study from China. Electronic Marketing 22(2):73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stouras KI , Hutchison-Krupat J , Chao RO (2017) Motivating participation and effort in innovation contests. Working paper, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C , Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Topcoder (2019) Topcoder development starter pack description. Accessed November 15, https://help.topcoder.com/hc/en-us/articles/227024108-Topcoder-Development-Starter-Pack-Description.Google Scholar
• Wang L , Tian J , Xu Y (2015) Relationship between design elements and performance in online innovation contests: Contest sequence is moderator? WHICEB 2015 Proc. (Wuhan, China) (Wuhan International Conference on e-Business, Wuhan, China), 74.Google Scholar
• Wu Y , Ramachandran K , Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y , Chen P-Y , Pavlou P (2009) Open innovation: An empirical study of online contests. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems. (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta)Google Scholar