A Deep Q-Network for the Beer Game: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Inventory Optimization
Published Online:23 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0939
References
- (2019) The big data newsvendor: Practical insights from machine learning. Oper. Res. 67(1):90–108.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Dynamic procurement of new products with covariate information: The residual tree method. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(4):798–815.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) The complexity of decentralized control of Markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 27(4):819–840.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) A reinforcement learning model for supply chain ordering management: An application to the beer game. Decision Support Systems 45(4):949–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The AI that has nothing to learn from humans. Atlantic 20:354–359.Google Scholar
- (2000) The stationary beer game. Production Oper. Management 9(1):19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Lower bounds for multi-echelon stochastic inventory systems. Management Sci. 40(11):1426–1443.Link, Google Scholar
- (1960) Optimal policies for a multi-echelon inventory problem. Management Sci. 6(4):475–490.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) The dynamics of reinforcement learning in cooperative multiagent systems. The Dynamics of Reinforcement Learning in Cooperative Multiagent Systems, (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI), 746–752.Google Scholar
- (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Stock positioning and performance estimation in serial production-transportation systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(1):77–88.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) On bullwhip in supply chains—Historical review, present practice and expected future impact. Internat. J. Production Econom. 101(1):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Inventory management in supply chains: A reinforcement learning approach. Internat. J. Production Econom. 78(2):153–161.Google Scholar
- (2019) Can deep reinforcement learning improve inventory management? Performance on dual sourcing, lost sales and multi-echelon problems. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3302881 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3302881.Google Scholar
- (1985) A multi-echelon inventory model for a repairable item with one-for-one replenishment. Management Sci. 31(10):1247–1256.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Case-based reinforcement learning for dynamic inventory control in a multi-agent supply chain system. Expert Systems Appl. 36(3):6520–6526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Kaggle.com (2018) Store item demand forecasting challenge. Accessed August 26, 2019, https://www.kaggle.com/c/demand-forecasting-kernels-only/overview.Google Scholar
- (2002) Computers play the beer game: Can artificial agents manage supply chains? Decision Support Systems 33(3):323–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Comments on “Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect.” Management Sci. 50(12S):1887–1893.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Deep reinforcement learning: An overview. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07274.Google Scholar
- (2014) The beer game: Its history and rule changes. Technical report, University at Albany, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
- (2016) Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. Balcan MF, Weinberger KQ, eds. Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (PMLR, New York), Vol. 48, 1928–1937.Google Scholar
- (2015) Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540):529–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) A review of cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03963.Google Scholar
- (2017) Stock-out prediction in multi-echelon networks. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06922.Google Scholar
- (2020) Applying Deep Learning to the Newsvendor Problem (Taylor & Francis), 444–463.Google Scholar
- (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 22(10):1345–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Foodmart’s database tables. Accessed September 30, 2015, http://pentaho.dlpage.phi-integration.com/mondrian/mysql-foodmart-database.Google Scholar
- (2017) Chexnet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest x-rays with deep learning. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05225.Google Scholar
- (2018) Multi-echelon base-stock optimization with upstream stockout costs. Technical report, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.Google Scholar
- (2019) Fundamentals of Supply Chain Theory, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Beer game order policy optimization under changing customer demand. Decision Support Systems 42(4):2153–2163.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2019) A theoretical analysis of deep Q-learning. Proc Machine Learning Res. 120:486–489, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00137.Google Scholar
- (2019) Multi-agent reinforcement learning: A selective overview of theories and algorithms. Preprint, submitted XX, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10635.Google Scholar

