Operational Disruptions, Firm Risk, and Control Systems
Published Online:10 Mar 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0943
References
- U.S. House of Representatives. 107th Congress (2002). 3763:Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 15 USC 7201, 107–204, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Airbus (2006) Airbus maintains target date for A380 certification and first delivery by year end, but announces shift in the production programme. Press Release. Accessed July 30, 2019, http://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2006/06/airbus-maintains-target-date-for-a380-certification-and-first-delivery-by-year-end-but-announces-shift-in-the-production-programme.html.Google Scholar
- (2012) Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value. J. Financial Econom. 104(1):70–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. J. Accounting Res. 47(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Principles of Corporate Finance, 10th ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
- (2014) SOX after ten years: A multidisciplinary review. Accounting Horizons 28(3):627–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sci. 38(1):131–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(1):9–32.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Allianz risk barometer—top business risks 2018. Accessed April 4, 2018, http://www.agcs.allianz.com/insights/white-papers-and-case-studies/allianz-risk-barometer-2018/.Google Scholar
- (2012) Managing disruption risk: The interplay between operations and insurance. Management Sci. 58(10):1898–1915.Link, Google Scholar
- Ernst & Young (2005) Emerging trends in internal controls fourth survey and industry insights. Accessed November 30, 2018, www.eycom.ch/publications/items/sox404/internalcontrol05/en.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2016) Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(1):69–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) A380 woes; downgrading recommendation to hold. June 13. Deutche Bank AG Report; London, England.Google Scholar
- (2016) Playing it safe? Managerial preferences, risk, and agency conflicts. J. Financial Econom. 122(3):431–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Management 21(5):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production Oper. Management 14(1):35–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The effect of operational slack, diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Management 27(3):233–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Factory Physics, 2nd ed. (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- (2005) Sarbanes-OxleySection 404implementation: Practices of leading companies. Accessed April 3, 2019, http://www.grantthornton.com.Google Scholar
- (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The effect of SOXSection 404: Costs, earnings quality, and stock prices. J. Finance 65(3):1163–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) A case for fatter supply chains. Accessed April 1, 2018, http://ww2.cfo.com/accounting-tax/2006/02/a-case-for-fatter-supply-chains/.Google Scholar
- (1997) Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. 40(3):626–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Payday lenders: Heroes or villains? J. Financial Econom. 102(1):28–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Office of Economic Analysis (2009) Study of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Section 404internal control over financial reporting requirements. Accessed March 11, 2019, http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/sox-404_study.pdf.Google Scholar
- Protiviti; APICS (2003) Capitalizing on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance to build supply chain advantage. Accessed May 11, 2019, https://www.protiviti.com/sites/default/files/united_states/insights/supplychain_soa_0.pdf.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2000) Selective disclosure and insider trading (final rule). Federal Register 65(165):51716–51740.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2002) Acceleration of periodic report filing dates and disclosure concerning website access to reports (final rule). Federal Register 67(179):58480–58507.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2003) Management’s reports on internal control over financial reporting and certification of disclosure in exchange act periodic reports (final rule). Federal Register 68(117):36636–36673.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2006) Internal control over financial reporting in exchange act periodic reports of non-accelerated filers and newly public companies (final rule). Federal Register 71(245):76580–76599.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2008) Internal control over financial reporting in exchange act periodic reports of non-accelerated filers (final rule). Federal Register 73(128):38094–38100.Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2010) Internal control over financial reporting in exchange act periodic reports of non-accelerated filers (final rule). Federal Register 75(182):57385–57388.Google Scholar
- (2005) The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2015) Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain. Interfaces 45(5):375–390.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(1):109–127.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Internat. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 9(1):33–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. 52(5):639–657.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Operational strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk. Kouvelis P, Dong L, Boyabatli O, Li R, eds. The Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The effect of succession taxes on family firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Finance 70(2):649–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):489–510.Link, Google Scholar
- (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1(6):80–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 12(2):308–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum; Accenture (2013) Building resilience in supply chains. Accessed April 11, 2018, http://www.weforum.org/reports/building-resilience-supply-chains.Google Scholar

