Optimal Contract Under Asymmetric Information About Fairness

References

• Andreoni J, Castillo M, Petrie R (2003) What do bargainers’ preferences look like? Experiments with a convex ultimatum game. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):672–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avci B, Loutfi Z, Mihm J, Belavina E, Keck S (2014) Comparison as incentive: Newsvendor decisions in a social context. Production Oper. Management 23(2):303–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory 26(2):445–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benoit D (2019) Move over, shareholders: Top CEOs say companies have obligations to society. Wall Street Journal (August 19), https://www.wsj.com/articles/business-roundtable-steps-back-from-milton-friedman-theory-11566205200.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves SC, de Kok AG, eds. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation, vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 227–339.Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. 51(1):30–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Christopher M (2010) Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 4th ed. (Financial Times Press, London).Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Zhou D, Tang CS (2004) Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 50(4):550–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P (2016) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):969–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• De Bruyn A, Bolton GE (2008) Estimating the influence of fairness on bargaining behavior. Management Sci. 54(10):1774–1791.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald M (2019) The CEOs of nearly 200 companies just said shareholder value is no longer their main objective. CNBC (August 19), https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/19/the-ceos-of-nearly-two-hundred-companies-say-shareholder-value-is-no-longer-their-main-objective.html.Google Scholar
• Forsythe R, Horowitz JL, Savin NE, Sefton M (1994) Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 6(3):347–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41(4):587–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Katok E, Pavlov V (2020) Bargaining process and channel efficiency. Management Sci. 66(7):2845–2860.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurwicz L (1972) On informationally decentralized systems. McGuire CB, Radner R, eds. Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak (North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam), 297–336.Google Scholar
• Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. 2(3):239–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986a) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986b) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59(4):S285–S300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. J. Oper. Management 31(3):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu DY (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Olsen T, Pavlov V (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ho T-H (2007) Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. 26(3):312–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1987) Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. 6(4):375–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47(1):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederhoff JA, Kouvelis P (2016) Generous, spiteful, or profit maximizing suppliers in the wholesale price contract: A behavioral study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253(2):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasternack BA (1985) Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. 4(2):166–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2013) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(5):1068–1095.Google Scholar
• Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58(4):347–352.Crossref, Google Scholar