The Threshold Effects on Consumer Choice and Pricing Decisions

References

• Ahumada A, Ulku L (2018) Luce rule with limited consideration. Math. Social Sci. 93:52–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Federgruen A (2004) A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. 52(6):868–886.Link, Google Scholar
• De los Santos B, Hortacsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echenique F, Saito K (2019) General Luce model Econom. Theory 68:811–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Yang N (2009) Competition under generalized attraction models: Applications to quality competition under yield uncertainty. Management Sci. 55(12):2028–2043.Link, Google Scholar
• Flores A, Berbeglia G, Hentenryck PV (2017) Assortment and price optimization under the two-stage Luce model. Working paper, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Li A (2017) Attention, consideration then selection choice model. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Wang R (2014) Price optimization and competition for multi-products under the nested logit model with product-differentiated price coefficients. Oper. Res. 62(2):450–461.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Wang R (2019) Threshold utility model with applications to retailing and discrete choice models. Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Li A, Truong VA, Wang X (2020) Approximation algorithms for product framing and pricing. Oper. Res. 68(1):134–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Cakanyildirim M 2019. Pricing for satisficing customers favoring products or availability while incorporating stockouts. Working paper, Penn State Erie.Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heese HS, Martinez-de-Albeniz V (2018) Effects of assortment breadth announcements on manufacturer competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):302–316.Link, Google Scholar
• Hopp WJ, Xu X (2005) Product line selection and pricing with modularity in design. Management Sci. 7(3):172–187.Google Scholar
• Huh WT, Li H (2015) Pricing under the nested attraction model with a multi-stage choice structure. Oper. Res. 63(4):840–850.Link, Google Scholar
• Ke C, Wang R (2021) Cross-category retailing management: Substitution and complementarity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H, Huh WT (2011) Pricing multiple products with the multinomial logit and nested logit models: Concavity and implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):549–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Li G, Rusmevichientong P, Topaloglu H (2015) The d-level nested logit model: Assortment and price optimization problems. Oper. Res. 63(2):325–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H, Webster S, Yu G (2020) Product design under multinomial logit choices: Optimization of quality and prices in an evolving product line. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):1011—1025.Google Scholar
• Li H, Webster S, Mason N, Kempf K (2019) Product-line pricing under discrete mixed multinomial logit demand.Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):14–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Dukes A (2013) Consideration set formation with multiproduct firms: The case of within-firm and across-firm evaluation costs. Management Sci. 59(8):1871–1886.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariott M (2014) Stochastic choice and consideration sets. Econometrica 82(3):1153–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, Ozbay EY (2012) Revealed attention. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2183–2205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Lattin M (1991) Development and testing of a model consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiller SA (2011) Opportunity cost consideration. J. Consumer Res. 38(4):595–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (2001) Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wang R (2018) Consumer choice with consideration set: Threshold Luce model. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Wang R, Sahin O (2018) The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Management Sci. 64(8):3649–3666.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Dada M, Sahin O (2019) Pricing ancillary service subscriptions. Management Sci. 65(10):4712–4732.Link, Google Scholar