Surge Pricing and Two-Sided Temporal Responses in Ride Hailing
Published Online:3 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0960
References
- (2018a) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 3120544, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
- (2018b) A tale of timescales: Surge pricing and dynamic matching for hotspot demand shock in ridehailing networks. Presentation, 2018 INFORMS Revenue Management and Pricing Section Conference, June 21–22, 2018, Toronto.Google Scholar
- (2020) Becoming strategic: Endogenous consumer time preferences and multiperiod pricing. Oper. Res. 68(4):1116–1131.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Ride sharing. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand (Springer), 73–97.Google Scholar
- (2016) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (2021) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Competition between two-sided platforms under demand and supply congestion effects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Price commitments with strategic consumers: Why it can be optimal to discount more frequently…than optimal. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):399–410.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 55(3):497–511.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the uber platform. Conitzer V, ed. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 455–455.Google Scholar
- (2020) Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):717–734.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Design of an aggregated marketplace under congestion effects: Asymptotic analysis and equilibrium characterization. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 217–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Harnessing the double-edged sword via routing: Information provision on ride-hailing platforms. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2019) Competition and coopetition for two-sided platforms. Accessed August 10, 2020, www.nyu.edu/projects/rzhang/TwoSided_Competition.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2018) Frustration-based promotions: Field experiments in ride-sharing. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
- (2015) How Uber surge pricing really works. The Washington Post (April 17), washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/04/17/how-uber-surge-pricing-really-works/.Google Scholar
- Driver Guidance System (2018) Driver Guidance System (DGS) trial. Accessed August 10, 2020, unicen.smu.edu.sg/research/dmm/fieldtrial/dgs_trial.Google Scholar
- Economist (2016) A fare shake. Economist (May 14), economist.com/finance-and-economics/2016/05/14/a-fare-shake.Google Scholar
- (2021) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Your Uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hu M, ed. (2018) Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, C. Tang (Series Ed.) (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
- (2020) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
- (2021) Dynamic type matching. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2016) Collaborative consumption: Strategic and economic implications of product sharing. Management Sci. 64(3):1171–1188.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Making the most of your regret: A behavioral investigation of workers’ relocation in on-demand platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Detest Uber’s surge pricing? Some drivers don’t like it either. CNET (August 23), cnet.com/news/detest-ubers-surge-pricing-some-drivers-dont-like-it-either/.Google Scholar
- (2017) Uber drivers are growing angrier over price cuts. Business Insider (March 2), businessinsider.com/uber-drivers-are-growing-angrier-over-price-cuts-2017-3.Google Scholar
- (2014) Are consumers strategic? Structural estimation from the air-travel industry. Management Sci. 60(9):2114–2137.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Is Uber’s surge-pricing an example of high-tech gouging? New York Times (January 12), nytimes.com/2014/01/12/magazine/is-ubers-surge-pricing-an-example-of-high-tech-gouging.html.Google Scholar
- (2016) How Uber punishes drivers who refuse to use UberPool. CNN (July 28), money.cnn.com/2016/07/28/technology/uber-uberpool-timeouts/index.html.Google Scholar
- (2018) Sharing economy: Review of current research and future directions. Customer Needs Solutions 5(1–2):93–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Thickness and competition in ride-sharing markets. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
- (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers. Management Sci. 63(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) When your boss is an algorithm. New York Times (October 12), www.nytimes.com/2018/10/12/opinion/sunday/uber-driver-life.html.Google Scholar
- (2007) Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions: A review and new research opportunities. Production Oper. Management 16(6):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Centralized routing in ride-hailing networks. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2019) Model and analysis of labor supply for ride-sharing platforms in the presence of sample self-selection and endogeneity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 125:76–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
- (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- Uber (2018) How surge pricing works. Accessed June 4, 2018, uber.com/drive/partner-app/how-surge-works/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews. Working paper, University of Florida, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
- (2012) Behavioral issues in pricing management. Özer Ö, Phillips R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 415–460.Google Scholar

