Multiportfolio Optimization: A Fairness-Aware Target-Oriented Model

References

• Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole américaine. Econometrica 21(4):503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almgren R, Thum C, Hauptmann E, Li H (2005) Direct estimation of equity market impact. Risk 18(7):58–62.Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust Optimization, vol. 28 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Popescu I (2005) Optimal inequalities in probability theory: A convex optimization approach. SIAM J. Optim. 15(3):780–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Sim M (2009) Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Sci. 55(1):71–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Carlin BI, Lobo MS (2010) Optimal portfolio liquidation with distress risk. Management Sci. 56(11):1997–2014.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Giorgi ED, Sim M (2012) Aspirational preferences and their representation by risk measures. Management Sci. 58(11):2095–2113.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen LG, Long DZ, Perakis G (2015a) The impact of a target on newsvendor decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(1):78–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen LG, Long DZ, Sim M (2015b) On dynamic decision making to meet consumption targets. Oper. Res. 63(5):1117–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont A, Boyd S (2003) Relaxations and randomized methods for nonconvex qcqps. EE392o class notes, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Diamond S, Boyd S (2016) CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 17(83):1–5.Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J. Derivatives 4(3):7–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabozzi FJ, Focardi SM, Kolm PN (2010) Quantitative Equity Investing: Techniques and Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2011) Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu J (2017) Information pooling game in multi-portfolio optimization. Contributions Game Theory Management 10(0):27–41.Google Scholar
• Goh J, Hall NG (2013) Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Management Sci. 59(6):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall NG, Long DZ, Qi J, Sim M (2015) Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 63(3):660–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Iancu DA, Trichakis N (2014) Fairness and efficiency in multiportfolio optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1285–1301.Link, Google Scholar
• Isii K (1962) On sharpness of Tchebycheff-type inequalities. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 14(1):185–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John B, Jared G, Zachary P, Tim L (2021) How investors can reach their 7% return target. Technical report, J.P. Morgan, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
• Khodadadi A, Tütüncü RH, Zangari PJ (2006) Optimisation and quantitative investment management. J. Asset Management 7(2):83–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA).Google Scholar
• Lam SW, Ng TS, Sim M, Song JH (2013) Multiple objectives satisficing under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 61(1):214–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanzillotti RF (1958) Pricing objectives in large companies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 48(5):921–940.Google Scholar
• Mao JC (1970) Survey of capital budgeting: Theory and practice. J. Finance 25(2):349–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• Merchant KA, Manzoni JF (1989) The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: A field study. Emmanuel C, Otley D, Merchant K, eds. Readings in Accounting for Management Control (Springer, Berlin), 496–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K, Sim M, Uichanco J (2010) Tractable robust expected utility and risk models for portfolio optimization. Math. Finance 20(4):695–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Cinneide C, Scherer B, Xu X (2006) Pooling trades in a quantitative investment process. J. Portfolio Management 32(4):33–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Laughhunn DJ, Crum R (1980) Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. 26(10):1039–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Laughhunn DJ, Crum R (1981) Note-further tests of aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. 27(8):953–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Qi J (2016) Mitigating delays and unfairness in appointment systems. Management Sci. 63(2):566–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1443–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh MW, Stubbs RA, Vandenbussche D (2010) Multiportfolio optimization: A natural next step. Guerard JB, ed. Handbook of Portfolio Construction (Springer, Berlin), 565–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scarf HE (1958) A min-max solution of an inventory problem. Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Scarf H, eds. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 201–209.Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2011) General information on the regulation of investment advisers. Accessed February 14, 2020, https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/iaregulation/memoia.htm.Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Goberna MÁ, López MA, eds. Semi-Infinite Programming (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 135–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1959) Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Amer. Econom. Rev. 49(3):253–283.Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Winkler RL (2006) The optimizer’s curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):311–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Stubbs RA, Vandenbussche D (2009) Multi-portfolio optimization and fairness in allocation of trades. White paper, Axioma Inc., Research Paper 013, New York.Google Scholar
• Tsoukalas G, Wang J, Giesecke K (2017) Dynamic portfolio execution. Management Sci. 65(5):2015–2040.Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Zhang Q (2019) Multiportfolio optimization with CVaR risk measure. J. Data Inform. Management 1(3–4):91–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Fukushima M (2009) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57(5):1155–1168.Link, Google Scholar