Shared-Ride Efficiency of Ride-Hailing Platforms

References

• Ahmadinejad A, Nazerzadeh H, Saberi A, Skochdopole N, Sweeney K (2019) Competition in ride-hailing markets. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bai J, Tang CS (2022) Can two competing on-demand service platforms be both profitable? Internat. J. Production Econom. 250:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen XM, Wang H (2019) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand platform: Price, wage, and payout ratio. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2015) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Xiao S, Yang X (2020) Do workers and customers benefit from competition between on-demand service platforms? Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Ding J, Kong G, Taylor T (2023) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):110–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, DeCroix G, Keskin B (2021) Competition between two-sided platforms under demand and supply congestion effects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1043–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-hailing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Daniels KM, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Hu M (2023) Courier dispatch in on-demand delivery. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4858.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Cui Y, Liu J, Liu X (2023) Bonus competition in the gig economy. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dai T, Korpeoglu C, Korpeoglu E, Sahin O, Tang CS, Xiao S (2020) Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Zhang R (2022) Competition and coopetition for two-sided platforms. Production Oper. Management 31(5):1997–2014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels KM, Turcic D (2021) Matching technology and competition in ride-hailing marketplaces. Working paper, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Farronato C, MacCormack A, Mehta S (2020) Innovation at Uber: The launch of express POOL. Teaching Case, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Feldman P, Frazelle AE, Swinney R (2022) Managing relationships between restaurants and food delivery platforms: Conflict, contracts, and coordination. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Google Scholar
• Feng G, Kong G, Wang Z (2023) We are on the way: Analysis of on-demand ride-hailing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1237–1256.Link, Google Scholar
• Guda H, Subramanian U (2019) Your Uber is arriving: Managing independent workers through surge pricing, forecast communication and worker incentives. Management Sci. 65(5):1995–2014.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand (Springer, New York), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2019) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Hu B, Hu M, Zhu H (2022) Surge pricing and two-sided temporal responses in ride-hailing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):91–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Wang J, Wen H (2020) Share or solo? Individual and social choices in ride-hailing. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Jacob J, Roet-Green R (2021) Ride solo or pool: Designing price-service menus for a ride-sharing platform. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 295(3):1008–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelsey G (2017) In a hot market, gig workers vanish. Wall Street Journal (August 9), B5.Google Scholar
• Lam J (2021) How to cut costs on your ride: Uber pools riders back together. The Australian (March 29), https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-to-cut-costs-on-your-ride-uber-pools-riders-back-together/news-story/a771c210010e068cbc0a64abe6272559.Google Scholar
• Lyft (2023) The driver’s guide to pay. Accessed January 11, 2023, https://www.lyft.com/driver/pay.Google Scholar
• Merced MJ (2016) Big infusion of funds for car-pool start-up. New York Times (May 6) B3.Google Scholar
• Nikzad A (2018) Thickness and competition in on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• O’Brien SA (2021) Lyft is bringing back a version of shared rides. CNN Business (July 15), https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/15/tech/lyft-uber-shared-rides-pandemic/index.html.Google Scholar
• Omar A-B (2022) Uber is bringing back shared rides in New York, San Francisco and several other U.S. cities. Wall Street Journal (June 21), https://www.wsj.com/articles/uber-is-bringing-back-shared-passenger-rides-in-several-u-s-cities-11655821042.Google Scholar
• Ozkan E, Ward A (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Preetika R (2021) Amid a driver shortage, a ‘reckoning’ for Uber and Lyft. Wall Street Journal (July 3), B2.Google Scholar
• Siddiq A, Taylor TA (2022) Ride-hailing platforms: Competition and autonomous vehicles. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1511–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Siddiqui F (2021) Lyft built a brand on being the nice gig work app clad in pink. Its drivers paint a different picture. Washington Post (September 21), https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/21/lyft-driver-shortage/.Google Scholar
• Solomon S (2021) Israel-founded ride-sharing firm Via buys U.S. mapping software maker Remix. Times of Israel (March 10), https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-founded-ride-sharing-firm-via-buys-us-mapping-software-maker-remix/.Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Guo P, Tang CS, Wang Y (2021) Gender-related operational issues arising from on-demand ride-hailing platforms: Safety concerns and system configuration. Production Oper. Management 30(10):3481–3496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Uber (2023) Your guide to driving with UberPool. Accessed January 11, 2023, https://www.uber.com/us/en/drive/services/shared-rides/.Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang R (2021) Carpool services for ride-sharing platforms: Price and welfare implications. Naval Res. Logist. 69(4):550–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Xiao S, Benjaafar S (2020) Two-sided competition between on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Yu JJ, Tang CS, Shen Z, Chen X (2020) A balancing act of regulating on-demand ride services. Management Sci. 66(7):2975–2992.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Nie Y (2021) To pool or not to pool: Equilibrium, pricing and regulation. Transportation Res. B 151:59–90.Crossref, Google Scholar