Optimal Electricity Imbalance Pricing for the Emerging Penetration of Renewable and Low-Cost Generators

References

• ACER (2020) Decisions of the agency for the cooperation of energy cooperation of energy regulators No. 18-2020. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://documents.acer.europa.eu.Google Scholar
• Al-Gwaiz M, Chao X, Wu OQ (2017) Understanding how generation flexibility and renewable energy affect power market competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):114–131.Link, Google Scholar
• Allaz B (1992) Oligopoly, uncertainty and strategic forward transactions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 10(2):297–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allaz B, Vila JL (1993) Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency. J. Econom. Theory 59(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson RW (1991) Futures trading for imperfect cash markets: A survey. In: Phlips L, ed., Commodity, Futures and Financial Markets. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 207–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SC (2004) Analyzing strategic interaction in multi-settlement electricity markets: A closed-loop supply function equilibrium model. PhD thesis, Harvard University. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/crump/papers/Anderson_thesis.pdf.Google Scholar
• Biggar DR, Hesamzadeh MR (2014) The Economics of Electricity Markets (Wiley-IEEE Press, West Sussex, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Hortaçsu A, Pavlin JM (2017) Inverse optimization for the recovery of market structure from market outcomes: An application to the MISO electricity market. Oper. Res. 65(4):837–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Borenstein S (2002) The trouble with electricity markets: Understanding California’s restructuring disaster. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(1):191–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunn DW, Kermer SO (2021) Statistical arbitrage and information flow in an electricity balancing market. Energy J. 42(5):19–40.Google Scholar
• Celebi M, Hajos A, Hanser PQ (2010) Virtual bidding: The good, the bad and the ugly. Electr. J. 23(5):16–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Paschalidis IC, Caramanis MC, Andrianesis P (2019) Learning from past bids to participate strategically in day-ahead electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(5):5794–5806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clò S, Fumagalli E (2019) The effect of price regulation on energy imbalances: A difference in differences design. Energy Econom. 81:754–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (2022) Introduction to Algorithms, 4th ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• EC (2016) Overview of European electricity markets – METIS technical note T4. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://ec.europa.eu.Google Scholar
• EU (2017) Commission regulation (EU) 2017/2195. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://eur-lex.europa.eu.Google Scholar
• Fares RL, Webber ME (2014) A flexible model for economic operational management of grid battery energy storage. Energy. 78(1):768–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• FERC (2014) Staff Analysis of Energy Offer Mitigation in RTO and ISO Markets. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.ferc.gov.Google Scholar
• Güler T, Gross G, Litvinov E, Coutu R (2010) On the economics of power system security in multi-settlement electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(1):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesamzadeh M, Biggar D, Bunn D, Moiseeva E (2020) The impact of generator market power on the electricity hedge market. Energy Econom. 86:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• HMSO (2020) Energy white paper. UK government. Accessed June 7, 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/energy-white-paper-powering-our-net-zero-future.Google Scholar
• Hogan WW (2016) Virtual bidding and electricity market design. Electr. J. 29(5):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (2020) Global Energy Review – 2020. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.iea.org.Google Scholar
• IRENA (2017) Adapting market design to high shares of variable renewable energy. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.irena.org.Google Scholar
• Ito K, Reguant M (2016) Sequential markets, market power, and arbitrage. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(7):1921–1957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jha A, Wolak FA (2019) Can financial participants improve price discovery and efficiency in multi-settlement markets with trading costs? Working Paper No. 25851, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Fei Y (2011) Dynamic residential demand response and distributed generation management in smart microgrid with hierarchical agents. Energy Procedia 12:76–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang DR, Powell WB (2015) Optima hour-ahead bidding in the real-time electricity market with battery storage using approximate dynamic programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(3):525–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamat R, Oren SS (2004) Two-settlement systems for electricity markets under network uncertainty and market power. J. Regul. Econom. 25(1):5–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Powell WB (2011) Optimal energy commitments with storage and intermittent supply. Oper. Res. 59(6):1347–1360.Link, Google Scholar
• Liberopoulos G, Andrianesis P (2016) Critical review of pricing schemes in markets with non-convex costs. Oper. Res. 64(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Lisi F, Edoli E (2018) Analyzing and forecasting zonal imbalance signs in the Italian electricity market. Energy J. 39(5):1–20.Google Scholar
• Löhndorf N, Minner S (2010) Optimal day-ahead trading and storage of renewable energies—An approximate dynamic programming approach. Energy Syst. 1(1):61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo ZQ, Pang JS, Ralph D (1996) Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahenc P, Salanié F (2004) Softening competition through forward trading. J. Econom. Theory 116(2):282–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mather J, Bitar E, Poolla K (2017) Virtual bidding: Equilibrium, learning, and the wisdom of crowds. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50(1):225–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumoto T, Bunn DW, Yamada Y (2021) Mitigation of the inefficiency in imbalance settlement designs using day-ahead prices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org.Google Scholar
• Morales JM, Conejo AJ, Madsen H, Pinson P, Zugno M (2014) Balancing markets. Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets (Springer, New York), 101–136.Google Scholar
• National Grid ESO (2021) Capacity market published round results. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.emrdeliverybody.com.Google Scholar
• Nordic Balancing Model (2021) Single-price model – Timeline and milestones. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://nordicbalancingmodel.net.Google Scholar
• Ofgem (2000) The market abuse licence condition for generators: A decision document. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.ofgem.gov.uk.Google Scholar
• Ofgem (2014a) Electricity balancing significant code review. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.ofgem.gov.uk.Google Scholar
• Ofgem (2014b) Electricity balancing significant code review – Final policy decision. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.ofgem.gov.uk.Google Scholar
• Petruzzi NC, Dada M (1999) Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2):183–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Peura H, Bunn DW (2021) Renewable power and electricity prices: The impact of forward markets. Management Sci. 67(8):4772–4788.Link, Google Scholar
• PWC (2018) 15th global power utilities survey. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.pwc.com.Google Scholar
• S&P Global (2018) FERC accepts PJM proposal to limit virtual transaction bidding points. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/5_3zsn9vjecn7diw2dmcia2.Google Scholar
• Secomandi N (2010) Optimal commodity trading with a capacitated storage asset. Management Sci. 56(3):449–467.Link, Google Scholar
• Sioshansi R (2014) When energy storage reduces social welfare. Energy Econom. 41:106–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su CL (2007) Analysis on the forward market equilibrium model. Oper. Res. Lett. 35(1):74–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Birge JR (2019) Strategic commitment to a production schedule with uncertain supply and demand: Renewable energy in day-ahead electricity markets. Management Sci. 65(2):714–734.Link, Google Scholar
• Sunar N, Swaminathan JM (2021) Net-metered distributed renewable energy: A peril for utilities? Management Sci. 67(11):6716–6733.Link, Google Scholar
• van der Veen RA, Abbasy A, Hakvoort RA (2012) Agent-based analysis of the impact of the imbalance pricing mechanism on market behavior in electricity balancing markets. Energy Econom. 34(4):874–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandezande L, Meeus L, Belmans R, Saguan M, Glachant JM (2010) Well-functioning balancing markets: A prerequisite for wind power integration. Energy Policy 38(7):3146–3154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber C (2010) Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems. Energy Policy 38(7):3155–3163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willis P, Altozano H (2016) Spanish authority fines Iberdrola 25m Euros in first REMIT market manipulation infringement decision. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.twobirds.com.Google Scholar
• Wu OQ, Kapuscinski R (2013) Curtailing intermittent generation in electrical systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):578–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Yao J, Oren S, Adler I (2007) Two-settlement electricity markets with price caps and Cournot generation firms. European J. Oper. Res. 181(3):1279–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zarnikau J, Woo C, Zhu S, Baldick R, Tsai CH, Meng J (2019) Electricity market prices for day-ahead ancillary services and energy: Texas. J. Energy Markets 12(1):43–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Xu H (2013) Two-stage stochastic equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints: Modeling and numerical schemes. Optimization 62(12):1627–1650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YH, Scheller-Wolf A, Secomandi N, Smith S (2015) Electricity trading and negative prices: Storage vs. disposal. Management Sci. 62(3):880–898.Link, Google Scholar