Ride-Hailing Platforms: Competition and Autonomous Vehicles

References

• Afeche P, Liu Z, Maglaras C (2018) Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
• Allon G, Cohen M, Sinchaisri P (2019) The impact of behavioral and economic drivers on gig economy workers. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington D (2008) The make-or-buy decision in the presence of a rival: Strategic outsourcing to a common supplier. Management Sci. 54(10):1747–1758.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Tang CS (2020) Can two competing on-demand service platforms be both profitable? Working paper, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
• Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen XM, Wang H (2018) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand platform: Price, wage, and payout ratio. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):556–570.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2016) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Xiao S, Yang X (2020a) Do workers and customers benefit from competition between on-demand service platforms? Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Ding J-Y, Kong G, Taylor T (2021) Labor welfare in on-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print April 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0964.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2019) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65(2):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Bensinger G (2017) Lyft jumps into driverless. Wall Street Journal (July 22), B2.Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, DeCroix G, Keskin B (2020) Competition between two-sided platforms under demand and supply congestion effects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print October 1, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0866.Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar V, Manning A, To T (2002) Oligopsony and monopsonistic competition in labor markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-hailing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Bosa D (2018) Lyft claims it now has more than one-third of the US ride-sharing market. CNBC Online (May 14), https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/14/lyft-market-share-051418-bosa-sf.html.Google Scholar
• Boston W (2017) Uber in pact for self-driving Volvos. Wall Street Journal (November 21), B1.Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the eBusiness Era (Springer, New York), 13–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Daniels K, Lobel R (2017) The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Guo Z (2014) Strategic sourcing in the presence of uncertain supply and retail competition. Production Oper. Management 23(10):1748–1760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dai T, Korpeoglu C, Korpeoglu E, Sahin O, Tang C, Xiao S (2020) Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Zhang R (2017) Coopetition and profit sharing for ride-sharing platforms. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Dixit A (1986) Comparative statics for oligopoly. Internat. Econom. Rev. 27(1):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duvall T, Hannon E, Katseff J, Safran J, Wallace T (2019) A new look at autonomous-vehicle infrastructure. McKinsey Insights (May 22) https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/a-new-look-at-autonomous-vehicle-infrastructure.Google Scholar
• Fuess SM Jr., Lowenstein MA (1991) On strategic cost increases in a duopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 9(3):389–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurvich I, Lariviere M, Moreno A (2019) Operations in the on-demand economy: Staffing services with self-scheduling capacity. Hu M, ed. Sharing Economy: Making Supply Meet Demand (Springer, New York), 249–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J, Thisse JF, Zenou Y (2000) Wage competition with heterogeneous workers and firms. J. Labor Econom. 18(3):453–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins T (2019) Tesla plans self-driving taxi fleet. Wall Street Journal (April 23), B3.Google Scholar
• Hu B, Hu M, Zhu H (2021) Surge pricing and two-sided temporal responses in ride-hailing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print February 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0960.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhou Y (2019) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
• Isaac M (2017) Uber in deal with Volvo to buy self-driving cars for its future network. New York Times (November 21), B6.Google Scholar
• Lin X, Lu T, Wang X (2018) Mergers between on-demand service platforms: The impact on consumer surplus and labor welfare. Working paper, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Cui Y, Chen L (2019) Bonus competition in the gig economy. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Luna N (2020) Report: After GrubHub snub, Uber looks to buy Postmates. Nation’s Restaurant News (June 30), https://www.nrn.com/delivery-takeout-solutions/report-after-grubhub-snub-uber-looks-buy-postmates.Google Scholar
• Lyft (2019) Form S-1. Accessed May 1, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1759509/000119312519059849/d633517ds1.htm.Google Scholar
• Mims C (2019) Exchange - technology - keywords: In a strong job market, the gig is up. Wall Street Journal (May 4), B5.Google Scholar
• Motavalli J (2020) Will driverless cars also be riderless? New York Times (May 29), B7.Google Scholar
• Murphy M (2016) Lyft’s cofounder has his own vision for a self-driving taxi fleet. Quartz (October 27), https://qz.com/819335/lyft-cofounder-john-zimmer-has-his-own-vision-for-a-self-driving-taxi-fleet-to-take-on-uber-and-tesla-tsla/.Google Scholar
• Nikzad A (2018) Thickness and competition in ride-sharing markets. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
• Ozkan E, Ward A (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ridesharing. Stochastic Systems 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Salop S, Scheffman DT (1987) Cost-raising strategies. J. Indust. Econom. 36(1):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seade J (1985) Profitable cost increases and the shifting of taxation: Equilibrium responses of markets in oligopoly. Technical report, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
• Siddiqui F, Bensinger G (2019) Uber, Lyft bet on the driverless dream. Washington Post (March 31), A1.Google Scholar
• Taylor T (2018) On-demand service platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):704–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Uber (2019) Form S-1. Accessed May 1, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1543151/000119312519103850/d647752ds1.htm.Google Scholar
• Wu S, Xiao S, Benjaafar S (2020) Two-sided competition between on-demand service platforms. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Wu X, Zhang F (2014) Home or overseas? An analysis of sourcing strategies under competition. Management Sci. 60(5):1223–1240.Link, Google Scholar