Unraveling Behavioral Ordering: Relative Costs and the Bullwhip Effect

References

• Asher J (2017) Close Deals Faster: The 15 Shortcuts of the Asher Sales Method (Ideapress Publishing, US)Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Bonnstetter W, Suiter JI, Widrick R (1993) The Universal Language DISC: A Reference Manual (Target Training International, Scottsdale, AZ).Google Scholar
• Bray RL, Mendelson H (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Randall T, Schmidt GM (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor DE, Katok E (2012) Production smoothing in a serial supply chain: A laboratory investigation. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 48:781–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantor DE, Macdonald JR (2009) Decision-making in the supply chain: Examining problem solving approaches and information availability. J. Oper. Management 27(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Lee HL (2012) Bullwhip effect measurement and its implications. Oper. Res. 60(4):771–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan JK, Simchi-Levi D (2000) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and in-formation. Management Sci. 46(3):436–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2003) Impact of pos data sharing on supply chain management: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 12(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dejonckheere J, Disney SM, Lambrecht MR, Towill DR (2003) Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147(3):567–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Disney SM, Towill DR (2003) On the bullwhip and inventory variance produced by an ordering policy. Omega 31(3):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Yao Y, Huo J (2015) Bullwhip effect under substitute products. J. Oper. Management 36:75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 4 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1942–1948.Google Scholar
• Evans JSB, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haines R, Hough J, Haines D (2017) A metacognitive perspective on decision making in supply chains: Revisiting the behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect. Internat. J. Prod. Econom. 184:7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Katok E (2011) Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 5(1):1–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz DN (1993) Information processing and misperceptions of the implications of feedback in dynamic decision making. System Dynam. Rev. 9(3):223–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Wang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Manage. Sci. 38:93–102.Google Scholar
• Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Wang S (2004) Comments on “Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect.” Management Sci. 50(12):1887–1893.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin A, Doherty M, Harrop J (2006) Flowcasting: The Retail Supply Chain (Factory 2 Shelf, Winooski, VT).Google Scholar
• Metters R (1997) Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. J. Oper. Management 15(2):89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Moritz BB (2015) Decision making and cognition in multi-chelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1216–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Goncalves P (2007) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect: “Satisficing” policies with limited information cues. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, http://web.mit.edu/∼paulopg/www/OG_Overreaction.pdf.Google Scholar
• Osadchiy N, Schmidt W, Wu J (2021) The bullwhip effect in supply networks. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3824.Link, Google Scholar
• Shan J, Yang S, Yang S, Zhang J (2014) An empirical study of the bullwhip effect in China. Production Oper. Management 23(4):537–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E, Shankar R (2008) Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies (Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Steckel JH, Gupta S, Banerji A (2004) Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. 50(4):458–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J (1989a) Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 43(3):301–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterman J (1989b) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision environment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Sterman J, Dogan G (2015) “I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here”: Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. J. Oper. Management 39:6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang D, Hu H, Van Mieghem JA (2019) Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations. Preprint, submitted April 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355114.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ren ZJ, Ho TH, Cohen MA (2005) An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. 51(2):208–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE (2014) Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking Reasoning 20(2):147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Disney SM (2016) The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(3):691–701.Crossref, Google Scholar