Do Managers Overreact When in Backlog? Evidence of Scope Neglect from a Supply Chain Experiment

References

• Albarracin D, Wyer RS Jr (2001) Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(6):691–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Berns GS (2010) Neuromarketing: The hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 11(4):284–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armony M, Plambeck EL (2005) The impact of duplicate orders on demand estimation and capacity investment. Management Sci. 51(10):1505–1518.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5):1252–1265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K (2015) Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Sci. Res. Methods 3(1):133–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E (2011) Linking task conditions to physiology and judgment errors in RM systems. Production Oper. Management 20(6):860–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyle M (2020) How the beer game helps retailers solve toilet paper crisis. Bloomberg (March 21), https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/how-the-beer-game-helps-retailers-solve-toilet-paper-crisis.Google Scholar
• Bray RL, Mendelson H (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor DE, Macdonald JR (2009) Decision-making in the supply chain: Examining problem solving approaches and information availability. J. Oper. Management 27(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Samroengraja R (2000) The stationary beer game. Production Oper. Management 9(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen KY, Wu D (2018) Buyer-supplier interactions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 459–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2002) Experimental economics and supply chain management. Interfaces 32(5):74–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2003) Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 12(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2005) Upstream vs. downstream information and its impact on the bullwhip effect. System Dynam. Rev. 21(3):249–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K, Katok E, Sterman J (2014) Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production Oper. Management 23(2):176–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Schultz K, Siemsen E, Yeo M (2013) Behavioral operations: The state of the field. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desvousges WH, Johnson FR, Dunford RW, Boyle KJ, Hudson SP, Wilson KN (1992) Measuring Nonuse Damages Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC).Google Scholar
• Ding S, Lugovskyy V, Puzzello D, Tucker S, Williams A (2018) Cash vs. extra-credit incentives in experimental asset markets. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 150(June):19–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein S (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Amer. Psych. 49(8):709–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonçalves P (2018) From boom to bust: An operational perspective of demand bubbles. System Dynam. Rev. 34(3):389–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan D, Wang D, Hallegatte S, Davis SJ, Huo J, Li S, Bai Y, et al. (2020) Global supply chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behav. 4(6):577–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Steckel JH, Banerji A (2002) Dynamic decision making in marketing channels. Zwick R, Rapoport A, eds. Experimental Business Research (Springer, Boston), 21–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haines R, Hough J, Haines D (2017) A metacognitive perspective on decision making in supply chains: Revisiting the behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect. Internat. J. Production Econom. 184(February):7–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Jacobs BW, Singhal VR (2020) Stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(4):683–699.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Rottenstreich Y (2004) Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. J. Experiment. Psych. General 133(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Embrey M (2018) Econometrics for experiments. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 35–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jola-Sanchez AF, Serpa JC (2021) Inventory in times of war. Management Sci. 67(10):6457–6479.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi D (1998) A new computerized beer game: A tool for teaching the value of integrated supply chain management. Lee H, Ng S, eds. Global Supply Chain and Technology Management, POMS Series in Supply Chain and Technology Management, Vol. 1 (Production and Operations Management Society, Miami), 216–225.Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Sproull L (1982) Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(4):548–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz DN (1993) Information processing and misperceptions of the implications of feedback in dynamic decision making. System Dynam. Rev. 9(3):223–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kormendi RC, Plott CR (1982) Committee decisions under alternative procedural rules: An experimental study applying a new non-monetary method of preference inducement. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(2–3):175–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubota Y (2016) Japan earthquakes rattle Toyota’s vulnerable supply chain. Wall Street Journal (April 19), https://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-earthquakes-rattle-toyotas-supply-chain-1460986805.Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Locke K (2010) Abduction. Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, eds. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Vol. 1 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 1–3.Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Rick S, Cohen JD (2008) Neuroeconomics. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:647–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luccasen RA, Thomas MK (2014) Monetary incentives vs. class credit: Evidence from a large classroom trust experiment. Econom. Lett. 123(2):232–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miendlarzewska EA, Kometer M, Preuschoff K (2019) Neurofinance. Organ. Res. Methods 22(1):196–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TW (1924) Competitive illusion as a cause of business cycles. Quart. J. Econom. 38(4):631–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moritz B, Narayanan A, Parker C (2021) Unraveling behavioral ordering: Relative costs and the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print November 10, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Barr PS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1395–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Moritz BB (2015) Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1216–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R (2003) Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151(3):552–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton L, Deaux J (2020) U.S. food makers are burning through cash to hoard ingredients. Bloomberg (June 9), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-09/u-s-food-makers-are-burning-through-cash-to-hoard-ingredients.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1992) Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898, edited by Ketner KL, with an introduction by Ketner KL, Putnam H (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1988) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (McGraw-Hill, Singapore).Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Reimann F, Kosmol T, Kaufmann L (2017) Responses to supplier-induced disruptions: A fuzzy-set analysis. J. Supply Chain Management 53(4):37–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Repenning NP (2002) Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sodhi MS, Tang CS (2021) Supply chain management for extreme conditions: Research opportunities. J. Supply Chain Management 57(1):7–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23(5):645–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steckel JH, Gupta S, Banerji A (2004) Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. 50(4):458–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J (2002) System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. 35(3):321–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman JD (1992) Teaching takes off: Flight simulators for management education: The beergame. OR/MS Today 35(3):40–44.Google Scholar
• Sterman JD, Dogan G (2015) “I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here.”: Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. J. Oper. Management 39–40(November):6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Oliva R (2005) Environmental change and organizational transformation. Indust. Corporate Change 14(6):1017–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociol. Theory 30(3):167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26(1):24–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4):628–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu DY, Katok E (2006) Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect. J. Oper. Management 24(6):839–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyer RS Jr, Clore GL, Isbell LM (1999) Affect and information processing. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31:1–77.Crossref, Google Scholar