Agricultural Supply Chains in Emerging Markets: Competition and Cooperation Under Correlated Yields

References

• Akkaya D, Bimpikis K, Lee HL (2018) Agricultural supply chains under government interventions. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Akkaya D, Bimpikis K, Lee HL (2021) Government interventions to promote agricultural innovation. Manufacturing Services Oper. Management 23(2):437–452.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Iravani F, Mamani H (2019) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
• An J, Cho S, Tang CS (2015) Aggregating smallholder farmers in emerging economies. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1414–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Nagarajan M (2017) Product portfolio management with production flexibility in agribusiness. Oper. Res. 65(4):914–930.Link, Google Scholar
• Behzadi G, O’Sullivan MJ, Olsen TL, Zhang A (2017) Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega 79:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintapalli P, Tang CS (2021) The value and cost of crop minimum support price: Farmer and consumer welfare and implementation cost. Management Sci. 67(11):6839–6861.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawande M, Gavirneni S, Mehrotra M, Mookerjee V (2013) Efficient distribution of water between head-reach and tail-end farms in developing countries. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):221–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Lall U, Şimşek AS (2019) Supply chain analysis of contract farming. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):361–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Guda H, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Rajapakshe T (2021) An economic analysis of agricultural support prices in developing economies. Production Oper. Management 30(9):3036–3053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huh WT, Lall U (2013) Optimal crop choice, irrigation allocation, and the impact of contract farming. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1126–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones PC, Lowe TJ, Traub RD, Kegler G (2001) Matching supply and demand: The value of a second chance in producing hybrid seed corn. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(2):122–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlin S (1958) One stage inventory models with uncertainty. Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Scarf H, eds. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA), 109–134.Google Scholar
• Kazaz B, Webster S (2011) The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):404–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Scheinkman JA (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):326–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe TJ, Preckel PV (2004) Decision technologies for agribusiness problems: A brief review of selected literature and a call for research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(3):201–208.Link, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature 25(2):699–738.Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M, Sošić G (2008) Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(3):719–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian X, Olsen TL (2020) Operational and financial decisions within proportional investment cooperatives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):545–561.Link, Google Scholar
• Sošić G (2006) Transshipment of inventories among the retailers: Myopic vs. farsighted stability. Management Sci. 52(10):1493–1508.Link, Google Scholar
• The World Bank (2010) Mozambique cotton supply chain rapid risk Assessment. Report, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem JA, Dada M (1999) Price vs. production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Sci. 45(12):1631–1649.Link, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1):8–37.Crossref, Google Scholar