To Earmark or to Nonearmark? The Role of Control, Transparency, and Warm-Glow

References

• Abbey JD, Meloy MG (2017) Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. J. Oper. Management 53–56(1):63–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Action Against Hunger (2020) About us—Action against hunger. https://www.actionagainsthunger.org/about.Google Scholar
• Aflaki A, Pedraza-Martinez AJ (2016) Humanitarian funding in a multi-donor market with donation uncertainty. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1274–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aflaki A, Pedraza-Martinez AJ (2023) Competition and collaboration on fundraising for short-term disaster response: The impact on earmarking and performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1451–1470.Link, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2021) MTurk research: Review and recommendations. J. Management 47(4):823–837.Google Scholar
• Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM, Zemla JC (2010) Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):436–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. (Lond.) 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barslund M (2007) Multivariate Tobit. https://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/bocode/m/mvtobit.html.Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J. Political Econom. 82(6):1063–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berenguer G, Shen Z-J(M) (2020) Challenges and strategies in managing nonprofit operations: An operations management perspective. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):888–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Besiou M, Van Wassenhove LN (2020) Humanitarian operations: A world of opportunity for relevant and impactful research. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):135–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Besiou M, Pedraza-Martinez AJ, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) Vehicle supply chains in humanitarian operations: Decentralization, operational mix, and earmarked funding. Production Oper. Management 23(11):1950–1965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (1998) An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: The nature of beneficent behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 37(3):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Zwick K (1998) Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness vs. acts of kindness. Internat. J. Game Theory 27:269–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kalkanci B (2021) How transparency into internal and external responsibility initiatives influences consumer choice. Management Sci. 67(2):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Burkart C, Besiou M, Wakolbinger T (2016) The funding-humanitarian supply chain interface. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 21(2):31–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2006) Calculation of multivariate normal probabilities by simulation, with applications to maximum simulated likelihood estimation. Stata J. 6(2):156–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caviola L, Faulmüllert N, Everett JAC, Savulescu J, Kahane G (2014) The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives? Judgment Decision Making 9(4):303–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cryder CE, Loewenstein G, Scheines R (2013) The donor is in the details. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(1):15–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels KM, Valdés L (2021) Trying and failing: Biases in donor aversion to rejection. Production Oper. Management 30(12):4356–4373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R (1997) Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):215–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan B (2004) A theory of impact philanthropy. J. Public Econom. 88(9):2159–2180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (1996) Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econom. Behav. 16(2):181–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ, Johnston RM (2005) An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. J. Public Econom. 89(8):1543–1560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Herberich DH, Meer J (2017) A field experiment on directed giving at a public university. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 66:66–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eftekhar M, Li H, Van Wassenhove LN, Webster S (2017) The role of media exposure on coordination in the humanitarian setting. Production Oper. Management 26(5):802–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Bhaskaran SR (2012) Consumer mental accounts and implications to selling base products and add-ons. Marketing Sci. 31(5):801–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Exley CL (2020) Using charity performance metrics as an excuse not to give. Management Sci. 66(2):553–563.Link, Google Scholar
• Fard MK, Eftekhar M, Papier F (2019) An approach for managing operating assets for humanitarian development programs. Production Oper. Management 28(8):2132–2151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Kariv S, Markovits D (2007) Individual preferences for giving. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1858–1876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs C, de Jong MG, Schreier M (2020) Earmarking donations to charity: Cross-cultural evidence on its appeal to donors across 25 countries. Management Sci. 66(10):4820–4842.Link, Google Scholar
• Giving USA (2021) Giving USA limited data tableau visualization. https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-limited-data-tableau-visualization.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Keenan EA, Gneezy A (2014) Avoiding overhead aversion in charity. Science 346(6209):632–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gourville JT, Soman D (2005) Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Sci. 24(3):382–395.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggard P, Tsakiris M (2009) The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(4):242–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang YH, Mattila AS (2019) Feeling left out and losing control: The interactive effect of social exclusion and gender on brand attitude. Internat. J. Hospit. Management 77:303–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotsi TO, Aflaki A, Aydin G, Pedraza-Martinez AJ (2023) Allocation of nonprofit funds among program, fundraising, and administration. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(5):1873–1889.Google Scholar
• Larney A, Rotella A, Barclay P (2019) Stake size effects in ultimatum game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 151:61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lecy JD, Searing EAM (2015) Anatomy of the nonprofit starvation cycle: An analysis of falling overhead ratios in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Volunt. Sector Quart. 44(3):539–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Seo YW, Siemsen E (2018) Running behavioral operations experiments using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Production Oper. Management 27(5):973–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2006) Field experiments: A bridge between laboratory and naturally occurring data. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 6(2):1–47.Google Scholar
• List JA, Momeni F (2021) When corporate social responsibility backfires: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Management Sci. 67(1):8–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Mejia J, Parker C (2021) When transparency fails: Bias and financial incentives in ridesharing platforms. Management Sci. 67(1):166–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Mejia J, Urrea G, Pedraza-Martinez AJ (2019) Operational transparency on crowdfunding platforms: Effect on donations for emergency response. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1773–1791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Buell RW, John LK (2020) Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1105–1121.Link, Google Scholar
• Nunnenkamp P, Öhler H (2012) How to attract donations: The case of US NGOs in international development. J. Development Stud. 48(10):1522–1535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottoni-Wilhelm M, Vesterlund L, Xie H (2017) Why do people give? Testing pure and impure altruism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(11):3617–3633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedraza-Martinez AJ, Stapleton O, Van Wassenhove LN (2011) Field vehicle fleet management in humanitarian operations: A case-based approach. J. Oper. Management 29(5):404–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peer E, Vosgerau J, Acquisti A (2014) Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 46(4):1023–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prakash C, Besiou M, Charan P, Gupta S (2020) Organization theory in humanitarian operations: A review and suggested research agenda. J. Humanitarian Logist. Supply Chain Management 10(2):261–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Privett N, Erhun F (2011) Efficient funding: Auditing in the nonprofit sector. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):471–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Toyasaki F, Wakolbinger T (2014) Impacts of earmarked private donations for disaster fundraising. Ann. Oper. Res. 221(1):427–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Shafir E (1992) Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psych. Sci. 3(6):358–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ülkü S, Dimofte CV, Schmidt GM (2012) Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Sci. 58(9):1761–1776.Link, Google Scholar
• Urquhart A, Girling-Morris F, Nelson-Pollard S, Mason E (2022) Global humanitarian assistance report 2022. https://devinit.org/documents/1221/GHA2022_Digital_v8_IdHI18g.pdf.Google Scholar
• Victor D (2019) Woman and homeless man plead guilty in $400,000 GoFundMe scam. New York Times (March 7), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/us/gofundme-homeless-scam-guilty.html.Google Scholar
• Warr PG (1982) Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. J. Public Econom. 19(1):131–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winterich KP, Mittal V, Aquino K (2013) When does recognition increase charitable behavior? Toward a moral identity-based model. J. Marketing 77(3):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar