Popularity Bias in Online Dating Platforms: Theory and Empirical Evidence

References

• Adachi H (2003) A search model of two-sided matching under nontransferable utility. J. Econom. Theory 113(2):182–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alhejaili A, Fatima S (2020) Latent feature modelling for recommender systems. Proc. IEEE 21st Internat. Conf. on Inform. Reuse and Integration (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 349–356.Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Vogels E, Turner E (2020) The Virtues and Downsides of Online Dating (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Burq M, Jaillet P, Manshadi V (2019) On matching and thickness in heterogeneous dynamic markets. Oper. Res. 67(4):927–949.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Banpa R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Google Scholar
• Belo R, Li T (2022) Social referral programs for freemium platforms. Management Sci. 68(12):8933–8962.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Hu M (2020) Operations management in the age of the sharing economy: What is old and what is new? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Bojd B, Yoganarasimhan H (2022) Star-cursed lovers: Role of popularity information in online dating. Marketing Sci. 41(1):73–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruch E, Feinberg F, Lee K (2016) Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 113(38):10530–10535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Dai T, Korpeoglu G, Korpeoglu E, Sahin O, Tang C, Xiao S (2020) OM forum—Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):429–643.Link, Google Scholar
• Ciampaglia GL, Nematzadeh A, Menczer F (2018) How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality. Sci. Rep. 8:1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du J, Lei Y (2022) Information design of matching platforms when user preferences are bidimensional. Production Oper. Management 31(8):3320–3336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farias V, Li A (2019) Learning preferences with side information. Management Sci. 7(65):2947–3448.Google Scholar
• Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Lett. 27(8):861–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Delgado M, Cernadas E, Barro S (2014) Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? J. Machine Learn. Res. 15:3133–3181.Google Scholar
• Fong J (2022) Effects of market size and competition in two-sided markets: Evidence from online dating. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• Fu R, Aseri M, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2022) Un fair machine learning algorithms. Management Sci. 68(6):4173–4195.Link, Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley L (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Piskorski MJ, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch G, Hortacsu A, Ariely D (2010a) Matching and sorting in online dating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):130–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch G, Hortacsu A, Ariely D (2010b) What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(4):393–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J, Lim H, Lee D, Kim C (2022) The secret of finding a match: A field experiment on choice capacity design in an online dating platform. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1248–1263.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.Link, Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Sci. 65(7):2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2016) Effect of online dating on assortative mating: Evidence from South Korea. J. Appl. Econometrics 31:1120–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin K-H, Lundquist J (2013) Mate selection in cyberspace: The intersection of race, gender, and education. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(1):183–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ong D, Wang J (2015) Income attraction: An online dating field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 111:13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronk TM, Denissen JJ (2020) A rejection mindset: Choice overload in online dating. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 11(3):388–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi A, Sethi S, Wei L, Zhang J (2020) Strategic overcapacity in live-streaming platform selling. Working paper, University of Texas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Rios I, Saban D, Zheng F (2023) Improving match rates in dating markets through assortment optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1304–1323.Google Scholar
• Shi L, Viswanathan S (2023) Optional verification and signaling in online matching markets: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print February 23, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1194.Google Scholar
• Vogels E (2020) 10 Facts About Americans and Online Dating (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wu Y (2021) Tinder, Bumble and Hinge show surge in Americans looking for love online. Wall Street Journal (February 13), https://www.wsj.com/articles/tinder-bumble-and-hinge-show-surge-in-americans-looking-for-love-online-11613246400.Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Padmanabhan V (2019) The strategy puzzle of subscription-based dating sites. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2019/01/the-strategy-puzzle-of-subscription-based-dating-sites.Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhang K, Padmanabhan V (2018) Matchmaker competition and technology provision. J. Marketing Res. 55(3):396–413.Crossref, Google Scholar