Telehealth in Acute Care: Pay Parity and Patient Access

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0345

References

  • Aremu EO, Heffernan JL, Kvedar JC (2022) The difference in practice expense costs between telehealth and in-office care could serve as the basis for differential reimbursement structures. Telemedicine e-Health 28(6):912–916.Google Scholar
  • Ashwood JS, Mehrotra A, Cowling D, Uscher-Pines L (2017) Direct-to-consumer telehealth may increase access to care but does not decrease spending. Health Affairs 36(3):485–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bavafa H, Savin S, Terwiesch C (2021) Customizing primary care delivery using e-visits. Production Oper. Management 30(11):4306–4327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumenthal D (2020) Where telemedicine falls short. Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed July 18, 2022, https://hbr.org/2020/06/where-telemedicine-falls-short.Google Scholar
  • Çakıcı ÖE, Mills AF (2021) On the role of teletriage in healthcare demand management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(6):1483–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cakici OE, Dewan R, Freimer M (2017) Patient choice in acute care. Proc. 50th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 5629–5637.Google Scholar
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2020) Medicare telemedicine healthcare provider fact sheet. Accessed July 18 2022, https://go.cms.gov/3Ht6bWg.Google Scholar
  • Chen M, Hu M, Wang J (2023) Food delivery service and restaurant: Friend or foe? Management Sci. 68(9):6539–6551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Department of Health & Human Services (2022) Telehealth codes covered by Medicare. Accessed July 18, 2022, https://bit.ly/3shGdR4.Google Scholar
  • Dooley MJ, Simpson KN, Simpson AN, Nietert PJ, Williams JD, King K, McElligott JT (2022) A modification of time-driven activity-based costing for comparing cost of telehealth and in-person visits. Telemedicine e-Health 28(10):1525–1533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FAIR Health (2023) Monthly telehealth regional tracker. Accessed December 21, 2023, https://www.fairhealth.org/fh-trackers/telehealth.Google Scholar
  • Feldman P, Frazelle AE, Swinney R (2023) Managing relationships between restaurants and food delivery platforms: Conflict, contracts, and coordination. Management Sci. 69(2):812–823.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felt-Lisk S (2020) Maintaining flexible telehealth policies after COVID-19. Technical report, Mathematica, Inc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Gallino S, Moreno A (2014) Integration of online and offline channels in retail: The impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information. Management Sci. 60(6):1434–1451.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gao F, Agrawal VV, Cui S (2022) The effect of multichannel and omnichannel retailing on physical stores. Management Sci. 68(2):809–826.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gao F, Su X (2017) Omnichannel retail operations with buy-online-and-pick-up-in-store. Management Sci. 63(8):2478–2492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon AS, Adamson WC, DeVries AR (2017) Virtual visits for acute, nonurgent care: A claims analysis of episode-level utilization. J. Med. Internet Res. 19(2):e35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haque SN (2020) Telehealth beyond COVID-19. Psychiatric Services 72(1):100–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R (2016) Rational Queueing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertzog R, Johnson J, Smith J, McStay FW, da Graca B, Haneke T, Heavener T, Couchman GR (2019) Diagnostic accuracy in primary care e-visits: Evaluation of a large integrated healthcare delivery system’s experience. Mayo Clinic Proc. 94(6):976–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang F, Guo P, Wang Y (2022) Modeling patients’ illness perception and equilibrium analysis of their doctor shopping behavior. Production Oper. Management 31(3):1216–1234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khwaja T (2020) The benefits of telehealth within mental healthcare. Mental Health Weekly 30(7):5–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu N, Wang S, Zychlinski N (2023a) RL or URL: Managing outpatient (tele) visits with strategic behavior. Preprint, submitted April 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4383199.Google Scholar
  • Liu N, Finkelstein S, Kruk M, Rosenthal D (2018) When waiting to see a doctor is less irritating: Understanding patient preferences and choice behavior in appointment scheduling. Management Sci. 64(5):1975–1996.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu N, van Jaarsveld W, Wang S, Xiao G (2023b) Managing outpatient service with strategic walk-ins. Management Sci. 69(10):5904–5922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McConnochie KM, Ronis SD, Wood NE, Ng PK (2015) Effectiveness and safety of acute care telemedicine for children with regular and special healthcare needs. Telemedicine e-Health 21(8):611–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehrotra A, Wang B, Snyder G (2020) Telemedicine: What should the post-pandemic regulatory and payment landscape look like? Technical report, The Commonwealth Fund, New York.Google Scholar
  • National Academy for State Health Policy (2021) States provide payment parity for telehealth and in-person care. Accessed July 18, 2022, https://bit.ly/3RrOXyu.Google Scholar
  • Rajan B, Tezcan T, Seidmann A (2019) Service systems with heterogeneous customers: Investigating the effect of telemedicine on chronic care. Management Sci. 65(3):1236–1267.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rajan B, Sainathan A, Agnihothri S, Cui L (2022) The promise of mHealth for chronic disease management under different payment systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3158–3176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ravitz N, Looby S, Jordan C, Kanoff A (2021) The economics of a telehealth visit: A time-based study at Penn Medicine. Report, Healthcare Financial Management Association, Downers Grove, IL.Google Scholar
  • Restrepo K (2018) The case against telemedicine parity laws. Technical report, John Locke Foundation, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  • Samson LW, Couture SJ, Creedon TB, Jacobus-Kantor L, Sheingold S (2023) Updated Medicare FFS telehealth trends by beneficiary characteristics, visit specialty, and state, 2019–2021. Technical report, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Sharma S, Xu Y, Gupta MK, Courcoubetis C (2019) Non-urgent visits and emergency department congestion: Patients’ choice and incentive mechanisms. Preprint, submitted October 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3480940.Google Scholar
  • Shi Z, Mehrotra A, Gidengil CA, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Ray KN (2018) Quality of care for acute respiratory infections during direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits for adults. Health Affairs 37(12):2014–2023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uscher-Pines L, Malsberger R, Burgette L, Mulcahy A, Mehrotra A (2016) Effect of teledermatology on access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees. JAMA Dermatology 152(8):905–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verma S (2020) Early impact of CMS expansion of Medicare telehealth during COVID-19. Health Affairs Blog (July 15), https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/early-impact-cms-expansion-medicare-telehealth-during-covid-19.Google Scholar
  • Yamamoto DH (2014) Assessment of the feasibility and cost of replacing in-person care with acute care telehealth services. Technical report, Alliance for Connected Care, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Zychlinski N (2024) Managing queues with reentrant customers in support of hybrid healthcare. Stochastic Systems 14(2):167–190.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.