Mind the Gap: Gender Disparity in Online Learning Platform Interactions

References

• Ashlagi I, Shi P (2014) Improving community cohesion in school choice via correlated-lottery implementation. Oper. Res. 62(6):1247–1264.Link, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R, Susan F Lu LXL, Huang S (2020) Gender bias in job assignment: Evidence from retail frontline managers. Preprint, submitted December 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758149.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Teck-hua H, Yong-mi K (2010) Knowledge market design: A field experiment at google answers. J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):641–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clotfelter CT, Ladd HF, Vigdor JL (2010) Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school. J. Human Resources 45(3):656–679.Google Scholar
• Cui R, Ding H, Zhu F (2020) Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):707–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Cullen Z, Farronato C (2021) Outsourcing tasks online: Matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer Internet platforms. Management Sci. 67(7):3985–4003.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubois P, Maftouni M, Chilana PK, McGrenere J, Bunt A (2020) Gender differences in graphic design Q&As: How community and site characteristics contribute to gender gaps in answering questions. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, vol. 4 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–26.Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Tomlin B, Wang LC (2014) Statistical discrimination or prejudice? A large sample field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(1):119–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Bhatia S (2020) Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 160:115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Grissom JA, Nicholson-Crotty J, Keiser L (2012) Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 22(4):649–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiller J, Durndell A (2006) Students’ linguistic behavior in online discussion groups: Does gender matter. Comput. Human Behav. 23(5):2240–2255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui X, Saeedi M, Shen Z, Sundaresan N (2016) Reputation and regulations: Evidence from eBay. Management Sci. 62(12):3604–3616.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Schenke K, Eccles JS, Xu D, Warschauer M (2018) Cross-national comparison of gender differences in the enrollment in and completion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics massive open online courses. PLoS One 13(9):e0202463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppler S, Li J, Wu D(A) (2021) Stopping the revolving door: An empirical and textual study of crowdfunding and teacher turnover. Preprint, submitted November 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3956054.Google Scholar
• Keppler SM, Li J, Wu D (2022) Crowdfunding the front lines: An empirical study of teacher-driven school improvement. Management Sci. 68(12):8809–8828.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna A, Orhun Y (2020) Gender (still) matters in business school. J. Marketing Res. 59(1):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwan A, Yang SA, Zhang AH (2023) Crowd-judging on two-sided platforms: An analysis of in-group bias. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print June 7, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4818.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Netessine S (2020) Higher market thickness reduces matching rate in online platforms: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Management Sci. 66(1):271–289.Link, Google Scholar
• May A, Wachs J, Hannák A (2019) Gender differences in participation and reward on stack overflow. Empirical Software Engrg. 24(4):1997–2019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLaugnlin GH (1969) Smog grading—A new reading formula. J. Reading 12(8):639–646.Google Scholar
• Moreno A, Terwiesch C (2014) Doing business with strangers: Reputation in online service marketplaces. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):865–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S (2022) OM forum—A vision of responsible research in operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):2799–2808.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Wang LW, Zhang DJ (2019) Peer bargaining and productivity in teams: Gender and the inequitable division of pay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):933–951.Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Ramdas K (2020) Alleviating poverty by empowering women through business model innovation: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management insights and opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):123–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Rovai AP, Baker JD (2005) Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. Quart. Rev. Distance Ed. 6(1):31–44.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Hansen MT, Podolny JM (2010) The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Sci. 56(9):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephens-Martinez K, Hearst MA, Fox A (2014) Monitoring MOOCs: Which information sources do instructors value? Proc. First ACM Conf. Learning @ Scale Conf. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 79–88.Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S (2014) When does the devil make work? An empirical study of the impact of workload on worker productivity. Management Sci. 60(6):1574–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Tang CS (2021) Innovative technology and operations for alleviating poverty through women’s economic empowerment. Production Oper. Management 31(1):32–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Guo P, Tang CS, Wang Y (2021) Gender-related operational issues arising from on-demand ride-hailing platforms: Safety concerns and system configuration. Production Oper. Management 30(10):3481–3496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thiemann P (2021) The persistent effects of short-term peer groups on performance: Evidence from a natural experiment in higher education. Management Sci. 68(2):1131–1148.Link, Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Tan TF, Staats BR, Edmondson AC (2019) Fluid teams and knowledge retrieval: Scaling service operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):346–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Virudachalam V, Savin S, Steinberg M (2022) Too much information: When does additional testing benefit schools. Preprint, submitted November 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3884543.Google Scholar
• Young S, McSporran M (2001) Confident men—Successful women: Gender differences in online learning. Montgomerie C, Viteli J, eds. Proc. ED-MEDIA 2001 World Conf. Ed. Multimedia Hypermedia Telecommunications (AACE, Norfolk, VA), 2110–2112.Google Scholar
• Zeltzer D (2020) Gender homophily in referral networks: Consequences for the medicare physician earnings gap. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 12(2):169–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang DJ, Allon G, Van Mieghem JA (2017) Does social interaction improve learning outcomes? Evidence from field experiments on massive open online courses. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(3):347–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Dang Y, Chen H (2013) Research note: Examining gender emotional differences in web forum communication. Decision Support Systems 55(3):851–860.Crossref, Google Scholar