Improving Farmers’ Income on Online Agri-Platforms: Evidence from the Field

References

• Adam MT, Krämer J, Müller MB (2015) Auction fever! How time pressure and social competition affect bidders’ arousal and bids in retail auctions. J. Retailing 91(3):468–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aker JC (2011) Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Econom. 42(6):631–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alemu D, Meijerink G (2010) The Ethiopian Commodity Exchange (ECX). Research report, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Alizamir S, Iravani F, Mamani H (2019) An analysis of price vs. revenue protection: Government subsidies in the agriculture industry. Management Sci. 65(1):32–49.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen WD, Evans DA (2005) Bidding and overconfidence in experimental financial markets. J. Behav. Finance 6(3):108–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anupindi R, Sivakumar S (2007) Supply chain reengineering in agri-business. Building Supply Chain Excellence in Emerging Economies (Springer, New York), 265–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Simonson I (2003) Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):113–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Levin J, Seira E (2011) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from timber auctions. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):207–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergquist LF, Dinerstein M (2020) Competition and entry in agricultural markets: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(12):3705–3747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouchery Y, Corbett C, Fransoo J, Tan T, eds. (2017) Sustainable Supply Chains: A Research-Based Textbook on Operations and Strategy (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyabati O, Nasiry J, Zhou Y (2019) Crop planning in sustainable agriculture: Dynamic farmland allocation in the presence of crop rotation benefits. Management Sci. 65(5):2060–2076.Google Scholar
• Business Line (2019) Just 14% of farmers registered on eNAM platform. Accessed February 18, 2024, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/just-14-of-farmers-registered-on-enam-platform/article28363454.ece.Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong JK (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coricelli G, Critchley HD, Joffily M, O’Doherty JP, Sirigu A, Dolan RJ (2005) Regret and its avoidance: A neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nature Neuroscience 8(9):1255–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP (2006) Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1737–1768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (2003) Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2007) Level-k auctions: Can a nonequilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner’s curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica 75(6):1721–1770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Costa-Gomes MA, Iriberri N (2013) Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. J. Econom. Lit. 51(1):5–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Orhun AY, Duenyas I (2019) How price dispersion changes when upgrades are introduced: Theory and empirical evidence from the airline industry. Management Sci. 65(8):3835–3852.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawande M, Gavirneni S, Mehrotra M, Mookerjee V (2013) Efficient distribution of water between head-reach and tail-end farms in developing countries. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):221–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Deichmann U, Goyal A, Mishra D (2016) Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries? Report, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Economist (2017) Ethiopia’s state-of-the-art commodity exchange. Economist (February 2), https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/02/02/ethiopias-state-of-the-art-commodity-exchange.Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Katok E (2018) Behavioral research in competitive bidding and auction design. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ), 525–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby WJ, Katok E, Santamaría N (2012) A laboratory investigation of rank feedback in procurement auctions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):128–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E (2008) Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. 54(4):808–819.Link, Google Scholar
• Evans O (2018) Digital agriculture: Mobile phones, internet & agricultural development in Africa. Actual Problems Econom. 7–8(205–206):76–90. Google Scholar
• Fabregas R, Kremer M, Schilbach F (2019) Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice. Science 366(6463):eaay3038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Lall U, Şimşek AS (2019) Supply chain analysis of contract farming. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):361–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay E, Ozbay EY (2007) Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1407–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu X, Akter S (2016) The impact of mobile phone technology on agricultural extension services delivery: Evidence from India. J. Dev. Stud. 52(11):1561–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganesh M, Deo S, Devalkar SK (2019) Leveraging digital technology to improve monitoring and planning in public sector supply chains: Evidence from India’s food security program. Preprint, submitted July 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3419350.Google Scholar
• Golrezaei N, Lin M, Mirrokni V, Nazerzadeh H (2017) Boosted second price auctions: Revenue optimization for heterogeneous bidders. Preprint, submitted August 12, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301646.Google Scholar
• Goyal A (2010) Information, direct access to farmers, and rural market performance in central India. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):22–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Bansal S (2022) Optimal market-integration decisions by policymakers: Modeling and analysis of agriculture market data. Oper. Res. 70(1):352–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Huotari K, Tolvanen J (2015) Gamification and economics. Walz FP, Deterding S, eds. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 139–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez MA, Rashid S, Lemma S, Kuma T (2017) Market institutions and price relationships: The case of coffee in the Ethiopian commodity exchange. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 99(3):683–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Liu Y, Wang W (2019) Socially beneficial rationality: The value of strategic farmers, social entrepreneurs, and for-profit firms in crop planting decisions. Management Sci. 65(8):3654–3672.Link, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Lit. 47(1):5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D (2016) Auctions: A survey of experimental research. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 563–637.Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Rahmani M, Toktay LB (2019) The role of inclusive innovation in promoting social sustainability. Production Oper. Management 28(12):2960–2982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Olivares M, Weintraub GY (2014) Measuring the performance of large-scale combinatorial auctions: A structural estimation approach. Management Sci. 60(5):1180–1201.Link, Google Scholar
• Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P (2019) A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci. 90–91:100315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna V (2009) Auction Theory (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ku G, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2006) Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6):975–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi R, Singhvi S, Zheng Y (2020b) Economically motivated adulteration in farming supply chains. Management Sci. 66(1):209–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Levi R, Singhvi S, Zheng Y (2022) Artificial shortage in agricultural supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(2):746–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Levi R, Rajan M, Singhvi S, Zheng Y (2020a) The impact of unifying agricultural wholesale markets on prices and farmers’ profitability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(5):2366–2371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao CN, Chen YJ, Tang CS (2019) Information provision policies for improving farmer welfare in developing countries: Heterogeneous farmers and market selection. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):254–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Gupta A, Ketter W, Van Heck E (2019) Information transparency in business-to-business auction markets: The role of winner identity disclosure. Management Sci. 65(9):4261–4279.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D, Bryan D, Prasad N, Reeves D (2007) Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. 55(2):223–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D (2010) The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):139–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica 52(6):1473–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mondiale B (2008) World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Report, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Newman N, Bergquist LF, Immorlica N, Leyton-Brown K, Lucier B, McIntosh C, Quinn J, Ssekibuule R (2018) Designing and evolving an electronic agricultural marketplace in Uganda. COMPASS’18 Proc. 1st ACM SIGCAS Conf. Comput. Sustainable Soc. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 14.Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Reiley DH, Sadrieh A (2021) Online auctions. NBER Working Paper No. 12785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Parker C, Ramdas K, Savva N (2016) Is IT enough? Evidence from a natural experiment in India’s agriculture markets. Management Sci. 62(9):2481–2503.Link, Google Scholar
• Reddy A (2018) Electronic national agricultural markets: The way forward. Curr. Sci. 115(5):826–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson PJ, Botzen WW (2019) Determinants of probability neglect and risk attitudes for disaster risk: An online experimental study of flood insurance demand among homeowners. Risk Anal. 39(11):2514–2527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roese NJ, Epstude K, Fessel F, Morrison M, Smallman R, Summerville A, Galinsky AD, Segerstrom S (2009) Repetitive regret, depression, and anxiety: Findings from a nationally representative survey. J. Soc. Clin. Psych. 28(6):671–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Ockenfels A (2002) Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1093–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schut M, Klerkx L, Sartas M, Lamers D, McCampbell M, Ogbonna I, Kaushik P, Atta-Krah K, Leeuwis C (2018) Innovation platforms: Experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experiment. Agriculture 54(4):542–563.Google Scholar
• Stantcheva S (2022) How to run surveys: A guide to creating your own identifying variation and revealing the invisible. Annu. Rev. Econom. 15:205–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strzebicki D (2015) The electronic marketplace as the element of the agricultural market infrastructure. Problems Agricultural Econom. 1(342):142–154.Google Scholar
• Sunding D, Zilberman D (2001) The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector. Gardner BL, Rausser GC, eds. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 207–261.Google Scholar
• Suri T, Udry C (2022) Agricultural technology in Africa. J. Econom. Perspect. 36(1):33–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S, Zettelmeyer F (2015) Information disclosure as a matching mechanism: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):886–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye L (2007) Indicative bidding and a theory of two-stage auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 58(1):181–207.Crossref, Google Scholar