Leveraging Consensus Effect to Optimize Ranking in Online Discussion Boards

References

• Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(6):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmed M, Spagna S, Huici F, Niccolini S (2013) A peek into the future: Predicting the evolution of popularity in user generated content. Kraaij W, de Vries AP, Jones CB, Maarek K, Shokouhi M, eds. Proc. Sixth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 607–616.Google Scholar
• Akbarpour M, Li S, Gharan SO (2020) Thickness and information in dynamic matching markets. J. Political Econom. 128(3):783–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Drakopoulos K, Manshadi V (2021) Information inundation on platforms and implications. Oper. Res. 69(6):1784–1804.Link, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Gur Y (2019) Learning in repeated auctions with budgets: Regret minimization and equilibrium. Management Sci. 65(9):3952–3968.Link, Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Harsha P, Perakis G, Singhvi D (2022) Learning personalized product recommendations with customer disengagement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):1789–1807.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Gur Y, Zeevi A (2016) Optimization in online content recommendation services: Beyond click-through rates. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho M, Kim Y, Choi D (2017) The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. Internet High. Educ. 34(January):10–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, De Morales G, Galeazzi A, Quattrociocchi W, Starnini M (2021) The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(9):e2023301118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Fiszer M, Kim B (2022) Frustration-based promotions: Field experiments in ride-sharing. Management Sci. 68(12):8653–8672.Google Scholar
• Cui R, Zhang D, Bassamboo A (2019) Learning from inventory availability information: Evidence from field experiments on amazon. Management Sci. 65(3):1216–1235.Link, Google Scholar
• De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Del Vicario M, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W (2017) Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Sci. Rep. 7(40391):1–9.Google Scholar
• Delaney D, Kummer T, Singh K (2019) Evaluating the impact of online discussion boards on student engagement with group work. Br. J. Ed. Al. Tech. 50(2):902–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLoach S, Greenlaw S (2007) Online discussion, student engagement, and critical thinking. J. Econ. Educ. 38(4):419–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derakhshan M, Golrezaei N, Manshadi V, Mirrokni V (2022) Product ranking on online platforms. Management Sci. 68(11):7712–7731.Google Scholar
• Dunn T, Kennedy M (2019) Technology enhanced learning in higher education: Motivations, engagement and academic achievement. Computers Ed. 137(August):104–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreira K, Parthasarathy S, Sekar S (2022) Learning to rank an assortment of products. Management Sci. 68(3):1828–1848.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferreira KJ, Goh J (2021) Assortment rotation and the value of concealment. Management Sci. 67(3):1489–1507.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferreira KJ, Lee BHA, Simchi-Levi D (2016) Analytics for an online retailer: Demand forecasting and price optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):69–88.Link, Google Scholar
• Fridgeirsdottir K, Najafi-Asadolahi S (2018) Cost-per-impression pricing for display advertising. Oper. Res. 66(3):653–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallino S, Moreno A (2018) The value of fit information in online retail: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):767–787.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis P, Li B (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Sci. 60(7):1632–1654.Link, Google Scholar
• Golrezaei N, Manshadi V, Schneider J, Sekar S (2021) Learning product rankings robust to fake users. Proc. 22nd ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 560–561.Google Scholar
• Gur Y, Momeni A (2022) Adaptive sequential experiments with unknown information arrival processes. Manufacturing & Service Oper. Management 24(5):2666–2684.Link, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Halabi AK, Larkins JA (2016) The impact of discussion board usage on overall performance in an introductory accounting subject. Pacific Accounting Rev. 28(2):216–231.Google Scholar
• Hong L, Dan O, Davison B (2011) Predicting popular messages in Twitter. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Companion World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 57–58.Google Scholar
• Jung J, Lim H, Lee D, Kim C (2021) The secret to finding a match: A field experiment on choice capacity design in an online dating platform. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):49–64.Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Udell M (2020) Dynamic assortment personalization in high dimensions. Oper. Res. 68(4):1020–1037.Link, Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Saban D (2021) Facilitating the search for partners on matching platforms. Management Sci. 67(10):5990–6029.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Fisher ML, Vaidyanathan R (2009) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N, Smith SA, eds. Retail Supply Chain Management (Springer, New York), 99–153.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair H (2014) The effect of social media marketing content on consumer engagement: Evidence from Facebook. Marketing Sci. 37(4):531–553.Google Scholar
• Levy S, Kraut RE, Yu JA, Altenburger KM, Wang Y-C (2022) Understanding conflicts in online conversations. Proc. ACM Web Conf. 2022 (ACM, New York), 2592–2602.Google Scholar
• Madani O, DeCoste D (2005) Contextual recommender problems. Elkan C, Dietterich T, Kwok JT, eds. Proc. 1st Internat. Workshop Utility-Based Data Mining (ACM, New York), 86–89.Google Scholar
• Mansbridge JJ (1983) Beyond Adversary Democracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2015) Position effects in search advertising and their moderators: A regression discontinuity approach. Marketing Sci. 34(3):388–407.Link, Google Scholar
• Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) The limits of reputation in platform markets: An empirical analysis and field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 20830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• O’Brien H, Toms E (2008) What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 59(6):938–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien H, Toms E (2010) The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61(1):50–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly T, Battelle J (2009) Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years on (O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou Y (2020) Fake news propagation and detection: A sequential model. Management Sci. 66(5):1826–1846.Link, Google Scholar
• Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (2011) Introduction to recommender systems handbook. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, Boston), 1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rios I, Saban D, Zheng F (2022) Improving match rates in dating markets through assortment optimization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3041–3057.Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Hofman J, Watts D (2016) Estimating the causal impact of recommendation systems from observational data. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 453–470.Google Scholar
• Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.Link, Google Scholar
• Talluri K, van Ryzin G (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Sci. 50(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Tatar A, De Amorim M, Fdida S, Antoniadis P (2014) A survey on predicting the popularity of web content. J. Internet Services Appl. 5(1):1–20.Google Scholar
• Ursu R (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
• Vulcano G, van Ryzin G, Ratliff R (2012) Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Oper. Res. 60(2):313–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams L, Lahman M (2011) Online discussion, student engagement, and critical thinking. J. Political Sci. Ed. 7(2):143–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Pollock P, Hamann K (2007) Does active learning enhance learner outcomes? Evidence from discussion participation in online classes. J. Political Sci. Ed. 3(2):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Alavi M (2001) Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quart. 25(3):371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar