OM Forum—The Operations of Well-Being: An Operational Take on Happiness, Equity, and Sustainability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0521

References

  • Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Ülkü S (2016) Modular upgradability in consumer electronics: Economic and environmental implications. J. Industry Ecology 20(5):1018–1024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal VV, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas VM (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amrute SB (2016) Encoding Race, Encoding Class: Indian IT Workers in Berlin (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
  • Ananat EO, Gassman-Pines A, Fitz-Henley JA (2022) The effects of the Emeryville fair workweek ordinance on the daily lives of low-wage workers and their families. Russell Sage Foundation J. Social Sci. 8(5):45–66.Google Scholar
  • Aneesh A (2015) Neutral Accent: How Language, Labor, and Life Become Global (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
  • Anwar MA, Graham M (2020) Hidden transcripts of the gig economy: Labour agency and the new art of resistance among African gig workers. Environment Planning A: Econom. Space 52(7):1269–1291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anwar MA, Graham M (2021) Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competitive Change 25(2):237–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Peyser P, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2022) The No Club: Putting a Stop to Women’s Dead-End Work (Piatkus, London).Google Scholar
  • Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2011) Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (PublicAffairs, New York).Google Scholar
  • Baucells M, Sarin R (2012) Engineering Happiness: A New Approach for Building a Joyful Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Bavafa H, Jónasson JO (2023) The distributional impact of fatigue on performance. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 21, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4855.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bellet CS, De Neve JE, Ward G (2023) Does employee happiness have an impact on productivity? Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4766.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin DJ, Debnam Guzman J, Fleurbaey M, Heffetz O, Kimball M (2023) What do happiness data mean? Theory and survey evidence. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 19(0):1–36.Google Scholar
  • Bergman A, David G, Song H (2023) “I quit”: Schedule volatility as a driver of voluntary employee turnover. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1416–1435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Besiou M, Pedraza‐Martinez AJ, Van Wassenhove LN (2021) Humanitarian operations and the UN sustainable development goals. Production Oper. Management 30(12):4343–4355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besser TL (1996) Team Toyota: Transplanting the Toyota Culture to the Camry Plant (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
  • Blass V, Corbett CJ (2017) Same supply chain, different models: Integrating perspectives from life cycle assessment and supply chain management. J. Industrial Ecology 22(1):18–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom P (2016) Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bohnet I, Van Geen A, Bazerman M (2016) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau J, Hopp W, McClain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):179–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Browne GD, O’Rourke D (2007) Lean manufacturing comes to China: A case study of its impact on workplace health and safety. Internat. J. Occupational Environment. Health 13(3):249–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, De Stefano F, Paolino C (2017) Safety reloaded: Lean operations and high involvement work practices for sustainable workplaces. J. Bus. Ethics 143(2):245–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capelli P, Bassi L, Katz H, Knoke D, Osterman P, Useem M (1997) Change at Work (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Corbett CJ, Tan T, Zuidwijk R (2013) Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):545–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cassar L, Meier S (2018) Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. J. Econom. Perspective 32(3):215–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cefkin M, ed. (2009) Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations (Berghahn Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chamberlain LJ, Hodson R (2010) Toxic work environments: What helps and what hurts. Sociol. Perspectives 53(4):455–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen MK, Rossi PE, Chevalier JA, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Lu SF, Lu LX, Huang S (2022) Gender bias in job assignment: Evidence from retail frontline managers. Tuck School of Business Working Paper No. 3758149. Preprint, submitted December 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758149.Google Scholar
  • Chopra S, Sodhi M, Lücker F (2021) Achieving supply chain efficiency and resilience by using multi‐level commons. Decision Sci. 52(4):817–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Churchill B, Craig L (2019) Gender in the gig economy: Men and women using digital platforms to secure work in Australia. J. Sociol. (Melbourne) 55(4):741–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole D, Narayanan S, Vickery S (2022) Does leader disability status influence the operational performance of teams with individuals with disabilities? An empirical study in the apparel industry. Working paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  • Conradie P (2018) Studies on the role of persons with disabilities as source of innovation. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  • Conti R, Angelis J, Cooper C, Faragher B, Gill C (2006) The effects of lean production on worker job stress. Internat. J. Oper. Production Manageement 26(9):1013–1038.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ (2018) How sustainable is big data? Production Oper. Management 27(9):1685–1695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, DeCroix GA (2001) Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. 47(7):881–893.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Klassen RD (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):5–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Powell WG (2009) The ReUse people: Turning scrap into sales. Hamschmidt J, Pirson M, eds. Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (Greenleaf Publishing, London), 346–369.Google Scholar
  • Corbett CJ, Turco RP (2006) Sustainability in the motion picture industry. Contractor’s Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board, UCLA Institute of the Environment, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Crozier M (2017) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cullinane SJ, Bosak J, Flood PC, Demerouti E (2014) Job design under lean manufacturing and the quality of working life: A job demands and resources perspective. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 25(21):2996–3015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Picker M (2020) Rethinking inclusion and disability activism at academic conferences: Strategies proposed by a PhD student with a physical disability. Disability Soc. 35(1):163–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delbridge R (1998) Life on the Line in Contemporary Manufacturing: The Workplace Experience of Lean Production and the ‘Japanese’ Model (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Distelhorst G, McGahan A (2022) Socially irresponsible employment in emerging-market manufacturers. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2135–2158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J. Econom. Psych. 29(1):94–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drolet A, Schwarz N, Yoon C, eds. (2010) The Aging Consumer: Perspectives from Psychology and Economics (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Drwecki BB, Moore CF, Ward SE, Prkachin KM (2011) Reducing racial disparities in pain treatment: The role of empathy and perspective-taking. Pain 152(5):1001–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubal V (2023) On algorithmic wage discrimination. Preprint, submitted 23 January, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331080.Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott MR, Wang Y, Lowe RA, Kleindorfer PR (2004) Environmental justice: Frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. J. Epidemiology Community Health 58(1):24–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elving JM (2019) The process of working closely with coworkers with visible disabilities: A grounded theory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  • Fassiotto M, Simard C, Sandborg C, Valantine H, Raymond J (2018) An integrated career coaching and time banking system promoting flexibility, wellness, and success: A pilot program at Stanford University School of Medicine. Acad. Medicine 93(6):881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fifield J, Reisine ST, Grady K (1991) Work disability and the experience of pain and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc. Sci. Medicine 33(5):579–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fink D (1998) Cutting into the Meatpacking Line: Workers and Change in the Rural Midwest (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).Google Scholar
  • Flynn DK (2009) “My customers are different!” Identity, difference, and the political economy of design. Cefkin M, ed. Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations (Berghahn Books, New York), 41–57.Google Scholar
  • Forsythe DE, ed. (2001) Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Frenkel SJ, Korczynski M, Shire KA, Tam M (1999) On the Front Line: Organization of Work in the Information Economy (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Georgeac OA, Rattan A (2023) The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations’ instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members’ sense of belonging. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 124(1):69–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giardili S, Ramdas K, Williams JW (2023) Leadership and productivity: A study of US automobile assembly plants. Management Sci. 69(3):1500–1517.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie NA, Walsh MHWA, Winefield AH, Dua J, Stough C (2001) Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work Stress 15(1):53–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gold S, Trautrims A, Trodd Z (2015) Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 20(5):485–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein SM (2003) Employee development: An examination of service strategy in a high‐contact service environment. Production Oper. Management 12(2):186–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzalez Cabello M, Siddiq A, Corbett C, Hu C (2023) Fairness in crowdwork: Making the human AI supply chain more humane. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Grant AM, Fried Y, Juillerat T (2011) Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. Zedeck S, ed. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 1 (Building and Developing the Organization), 417–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray ML, Suri S (2019) Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) OR FORUM—The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1):10–18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, Tsipa A, O’Connor DB (2016) Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: A systematic review. PLoS One 11(7):e0159015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heerwagen JH, Heubach JG, Montgomery J, Weimer WC (1995) Environmental design, work, and well being: Managing occupational stress through changes in the workplace environment. AAOHN J. 43(9):458–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendren S (2020) What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World (Riverhead Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Herzberg F (1966) Work and the Nature of Man (World Publishing Co., Cleveland).Google Scholar
  • Ho K (2009) Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (2001) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, 2nd ed. (Henry Holt and Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (2012) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, 3rd ed. (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodson R (2001) Disorganized, unilateral, and participative organizations: New insights from the ethnographic literature. Industrial Relations: J. Econom. Soc. 40(2):204–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodson R (2005) Management behaviour as social capital: A systematic analysis of organizational ethnographies. British J. Industry Relations 43(1):41–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodson R, Sullivan TA (2012) The Social Organization of Work, 5th ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hopp WJ (2018) Positive lean: Merging the science of efficiency with the psychology of work. Internat. J. Production Res. 56(1–2):398–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Spearman MS (2020) The lenses of lean: Visioning the science and practice of efficiency. J. Oper. Management 67(5):610–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Iravani SM, Liu F (2009) Managing white‐collar work: An operations‐oriented survey. Production Oper. Management 18(1):1–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huo ML, Boxall P (2017) Lean production and the well‐being of the frontline manager: The job demands–resources model as a diagnostic tool in Chinese manufacturing. Asia Pacicifc J. Human Resources 55(3):280–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ILO and UNICEF (2021) Child Labour: Global Estimates 2020, Trends and the Road Forward (ILO and UNICEF, New York).Google Scholar
  • Irani L (2019) Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Iszatt-White M (2007) Catching them at it: An ethnography of rule violation. Ethnography 8(4):445–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jean-Baptiste A (2020) Building for Everyone: Expand Your Market with Design Practices from Google’s Product Inclusion Team (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Johnson MP, Chichirau GR (2020) Diversity, equity, and inclusion in operations research and analytics: A research agenda for scholarship, practice, and service. INFORMS TutORials in Oper. Res., 1–38.Google Scholar
  • Jung J, Widmar NO, Ellison B (2023) The curious case of Baby Formula in the United States in 2022: Cries for urgent action months after silence in the midst of Alarm Bells. Food Ethics 8(4):1–8.Google Scholar
  • Juravich T (1985) Chaos on the Shop Floor: A Worker’s View of Quality, Productivity, and Management (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kalkanci B, Rahmani M, Toktay LB (2019) The role of inclusive innovation in promoting social sustainability. Production Oper. Management 28(12):2960–2982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karasek RA Jr (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):285–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karuppan CM, Schniederjans MJ (1995) Sources of stress in an automated plant. Production Oper. Management 4(2):108–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KC D (2020) Worker productivity in operations management. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 13(3):151–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelty CM (2008) Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kesavan S, Lambert SJ, Williams JC, Pendem PK (2022) Doing well by doing good: Improving retail store performance with responsible scheduling practices at the Gap, Inc. Management Sci. 68(11):7818–7836.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen HK, Ducharme LJ, Roman PM (2007) Job stress and poor sleep quality: Data from an American sample of full-time workers. Soc. Sci. Medicine 64(10):1997–2007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korczynski M, Evans C (2013) Customer abuse to service workers: An analysis of its social creation within the service economy. Work Employment Soc. 27(5):768–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreitzer RJ, Sweet-Cushman J (2022) Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform. J. Acad. Ethics 20:73–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda G (2006) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, revised ed. (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Landsbergis PA, Cahill J, Schnall P (1999) The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. J. Occupation Health Psych. 4(2):108–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeBaron G (2021) The role of supply chains in the global business of forced labour. J. Supply Chain Management 57(2):29–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lehdonvirta V (2018) Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Tech. Work Employment 33(1):13–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipsky M (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Long X, Nasiry J (2022) Sustainability in the fast fashion industry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1276–1293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Longoni A, Pagell M, Johnston D, Veltri A (2013) When does lean hurt? An exploration of lean practices and worker health and safety outcomes. Internat. J. Production Res. 51(11):3300–3320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu G, Du RY, Peng X (2022) The impact of schedule consistency on shift worker productivity: An empirical investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(5):2780–2796.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lupu I, Rokka J (2022) “Feeling in control”: Optimal busyness and the temporality of organizational controls. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1396–1422.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macky K, Boxall P (2008) High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific J. Human Resources 46(1):38–55.Google Scholar
  • Magnani F, Carbone V, Moatti V (2019) The human dimension of lean: A literature review. Supply Chain Forum Internat. J. 20(2):132–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marmot MG, Rose G, Shipley M, Hamilton PJ (1978) Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J. Epidemiology Community Health 32(4):244–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marmot MG, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, et al. (1991) Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Lancet. 337(Jun 8):1387–1393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall D, Metters R, Pagell M (2016) Changing a leopard’s spots: A new research direction for organizational culture in the operations management field. Production Oper. Management 25(9):1506–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP (2001) Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psych. 52:397–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Metters R, Marshall D, Pagell M (2019) Cultural research in the production and operations management field. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 13(1–2):1–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moe NB, Dingsøyr T, Dybå T (2010) A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Inform. Software Tech. 52(5):480–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery A, Todorova I, Baban A, Panagopoulou E (2013) Improving quality and safety in the hospital: The link between organizational culture, burnout, and quality of care. British J. Health Psych. 18(3):656–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgeson FP, Garza AS, Campion MA (2020) Work design. Schmitt NW, Highhouse S, eds. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12, Handbook of Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 525–559.Google Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Terris E (2020) Inclusive manufacturing: The impact of disability diversity on productivity in a work integration social enterprise. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1112–1130.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Terris E, Cole D (2021) Disability inclusion in operations. Swaminathan JM, Deshpande V, eds. Responsible Business Operations: Opportunities and Challenges (Springer, Berlin), 115–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naveh E, Lei Z (2019) Coping with errors in organizations: Challenges, opportunities, and frontiers for operations management research. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management 12(4):349–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S (2022) OM forum—A vision of responsible research in operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):2799–2808.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • New SJ (2015) Modern slavery and the supply chain: The limits of corporate social responsibility? Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 20(6):697–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niero M, Jensen CL, Fratini CF, Dorland J, Jørgensen MS, Georg S (2021) Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives? J. Industry Ecology 25(5):1111–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niewoehner III RJ, Staats BR (2022) Focusing provider attention: An empirical examination of incentives and feedback in flu vaccinations. Management Sci. 68(5):3680–3702.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N, Berkley JD (1994) Whatever happened to the take-charge manager? Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(1):128–137.Google Scholar
  • O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Okat D, Vasudevan EV (2023) Going the extra mile: What taxi rides tell us about the long-hour culture in finance. Management Sci. 69(7):4228–4239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ong A (2010) Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia, 2nd ed. (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Pagell M, Shevchenko A (2014) Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. J. Supply Chain Management 50(1):44–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker S, Wall T (1998) Job and Work Design: Organizing Work to Promote Well-Being and Effectiveness (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pendem PK, Green PI Jr, Staats BR (2022) The microstructure of work: Understanding productivity benefits and costs of interruptions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(4):2202–2220.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JL (1995) Gender Trials: Emotional Lives in Contemporary Law Firms (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management. Energy Econom. 34:S64–S74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Ramdas K (2020) Alleviating poverty by empowering women through business model innovation: Manufacturing & service operations management insights and opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):123–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porteous AH, Rammohan SV, Lee HL (2015) Carrots or sticks? Improving social and environmental compliance at suppliers through incentives and penalties. Production Oper. Management 24(9):1402–1413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prior J (2011) Everyday practices of agile software developers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  • Purc-Stephenson RJ, Jones SK, Ferguson CL (2017) “Forget about the glass ceiling, I’m stuck in a glass box”: A meta-ethnography of work participation for persons with physical disabilities. J. Vocation Rehabilitation 46(1):49–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rani U, Furrer M (2021) Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competitive Change 25(2):212–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiff JS, Zhang JC, Gallus J, Dai H, Pedley NM, Vangala S, Leuchter RK, et al. (2022) When peer comparison information harms physician well-being. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 119(29):e2121730119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reina CS, Kreiner GE, Rheinhardt A, Mihelcic CA (2023) Your presence is requested: Mindfulness infusion in workplace interactions and relationships. Organ. Sci. 34(2):722–753.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reinecke J, Donaghey J (2021) Toward worker‐driven supply chain governance: Developing decent work through democratic worker participation. J. Supply Chain Management 57(2):14–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts ST (2019) Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Robertson T (2000) Co-operative work, women and the working environments of technology design. Australian. Female Stud. 15(32):205–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roels G, Staats BR (2021) OM forum—People-centric operations: Achievements and future research directions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(4):745–757.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblat A, Stark L (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. Internat. J. Comm. 10:3758–3784.Google Scholar
  • Roth A, Zheng Y (2021) A tale of two food chains: The duality of practices on well‐being. Production Oper. Management 30(3):783–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandberg N (2016) ‘Engineers optimise everything’: Socialisation and control in software development work. Unpublished MS thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  • Schor JB (2020) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked (University of California Press, Oakland).Google Scholar
  • Schor JB, Attwood-Charles W, Cansoy M, Ladegaard I, Wengronowitz R (2020) Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory Soc. 49:833–861.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schörpf P, Flecker J, Schönauer A, Eichmann H (2017) Triangular love–hate: Management and control in creative crowdworking. New Tech. Work Employment 32(1):43–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulte PA, Guerin RJ, Schill AL, Bhattacharya A, Cunningham TR, Pandalai SP, Eggerth D, et al. (2015) Considerations for incorporating “well-being” in public policy for workers and workplaces. Amer. J. Public Health 105(8):e31–e44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seeborg IS (1978) The influence of employee participation in job redesign. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 14(1):87–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seim J (2020) Bandage, Sort, and Hustle: Ambulance Crews on the Front Lines of Urban Suffering (University of California Press, Oakland).Google Scholar
  • Shunko M, Niederhoff J, Rosokha Y (2018) Humans are not machines: The behavioral impact of queueing design on service time. Management Sci. 64(1):453–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Roth AV, Balasubramanian S, Anand G (2009) The influence of psychological safety and confidence in knowledge on employee knowledge sharing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(3):429–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL (2015) The diseconomies of queue pooling: An empirical investigation of emergency department length of stay. Management Sci. 61(12):3032–3053.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sönmez N, Srinivasan K, Venkatesh R, Buell RW, Ramdas K (2023) Evidence from the first Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) randomised controlled trial in India: SMAs increase the satisfaction, knowledge, and medication compliance of patients with glaucoma. PLOS Global Public Health 3(7):e0001648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soundararajan V, Wilhelm MM, Crane A (2021) Humanizing research on working conditions in supply chains: Building a path to decent work. J. Supply Chain Management 57(2):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spang ES, Moreno LC, Pace SA, Achmon Y, Donis-Gonzalez I, Gosliner WA, Jablonski-Sheffield MP, et al. (2019) Food loss and waste: Measurement, drivers, and solutions. Annu. Rev. Environment. Resources 44:117–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Brunner DJ, Upton DM (2011) Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider. J. Oper. Management 29(5):376–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stice-Lusvardi R, Hinds PJ, Valentine M (2023) Legitimating illegitimate practices: How data analysts compromised their standards to promote quantification. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print January 30, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1655.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suckley LJ, Price I, Sharpe J (2013) Exploring inter‐departmental barriers between production and quality. J. Organ. Ethnography 2(2):173–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sull D, Sull C, Zweig B (2022) Toxic culture is driving the great resignation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 63(2):1–9.Google Scholar
  • Sunar N, Swaminathan JM (2022) Socially relevant and inclusive operations management. Production Oper. Management 31(12):4379–4392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ton Z (2014) The Good Jobs Strategy: How the Smartest Companies Invest in Employees to Lower Costs and Boosts Profits (Little A, New York).Google Scholar
  • Turkoglu A, Carson A (2022) The demotivating effects of relative performance feedback on middle-ranked workers’ performance. Preprint, submitted October 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4242303.Google Scholar
  • Upadhya C (2016) Reengineering India: Work, Capital, and Class in an Offshore Economy (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G, Koh KN (2013) Ethnographic research on modern business corporations. Annu. Rev. Anthropology 42:139–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Woensel T, Creten R, Vandaele N (2001) Managing the environmental externalities of traffic logistics: The issue of emissions. Production Oper. Management 10(2):207–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Zhou Y-P (2018) Impact of queue configuration on service time: Evidence from a supermarket. Management Sci. 64(7):3055–3075.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weinfeld M (1999) The challenge of ethnic match: Minority origin professionals. Troper H, Weinfeld M, eds. Ethnicity, Politics, and Public Policy: Case Studies in Canadian Diversity (University of Toronto Press, Toronto), 117–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wells NS, Rosenthal C (2023) A broken partnership: How clothing brands exploit suppliers and harm workers: And what can be done about it. Report, NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, New York.Google Scholar
  • Wiengarten F, Pagell M, Durach CF, Humphreys P (2021) Exploring the performance implications of precarious work. J. Oper. Management 67(8):926–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams BB (1987) Black Workers in an Industrial Suburb: The Struggle Against Discrimination (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wollbrant CE, Knutsson M, Martinsson P (2022) Extrinsic rewards and crowding-out of prosocial behaviour. Nature Human Behav. 6(June):774–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woydack J (2019) Linguistic Ethnography of a Multilingual Call Center: London Calling (Palgrave McMillan, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright BM, Cordery JL (1999) Production uncertainty as a contextual moderator of employee reactions to job design. J. Appl. Psych. 84(3):456.Google Scholar
  • Wu J (2022) Measurement for dummies? Exploring the role of policy-driven measurement in automotive safety. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  • Xin H, Stone R (2008) Chinese probe unmasks high-tech adulteration with melamine. Science 322(5906):1310–1311.Google Scholar
  • Yavuz M, Bianchi G, Corbett CJ, Bergstrom T, Drolet A, Malloy TF, Rajagopal D, Sarin RK, et al. (2023) Choices with environmental attributes are influenced by irrelevant alternatives. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Guan D, Wang R, Meng J, Zheng H, Zhu K, Du H (2020) Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nature Climate Change 10(12):1096–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zyskowski K, Morris MR, Bigham JP, Gray ML, Kane SK (2015) Accessible crowdwork? Understanding the value in and challenge of microtask employment for people with disabilities. Proc. 18th ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Comput. (ACM, New York), 1682–1693.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.