Fairness Regulation of Prices in Competitive Markets
References
- (2012) When consumers care about being treated fairly: The interaction of relationship norms and fairness norms. J. Consumer Psych. 22(1):114–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Price fairness and strategic obfuscation. Marketing Sci. 40(1):122–146.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) On the microeconomic foundations of linear demand for differentiated products. J. Econom. Theory 169:641–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Pollution regulation of competitive markets. Management Sci. 66(9):4193–4206.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Discriminating against captive customers. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 1(3):257–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Principles of Marketing (Pearson, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2022) Fair resource allocation in a volatile marketplace. Oper. Res. 70(1):288–308.Link, Google Scholar
- (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, vol. 9 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2017) Price cutting and business stealing in imperfect cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(2):387–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Sci. 58(12):2234–2250.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Price fairness: Good and service differences and the role of vendor costs. J. Consumer Res. 33(2):258–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Dynamic pricing in customer markets with switching costs. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 20:43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Interesting, important, and impactful operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):214–222.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Supply chain fairness. Production Oper. Management 31(12):4304–4318.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Assortment display, price competition and fairness in online marketplaces. Preprint, submitted August 31, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3913764.Google Scholar
- Citizens Advice (2018) Excessive prices for disengaged consumers: A super-complaint to the competition and markets authority. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/wales/about-us/our-work/policy/policy-research-topics/consumer-policy-research/consumer-policy-research/excessive-prices-for-disengaged-consumers-a-super-complaint-to-the-competition-and-markets-authority/.Google Scholar
- (2022) Price discrimination with fairness constraints. Management Sci. 68(12):8536–8552.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Dynamic pricing with fairness constraints. Preprint, submitted September 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3930622.Google Scholar
- (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):386–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competition and Markets Authority (2018) Tackling the loyalty penalty. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-the-loyalty-penalty/tackling-the-loyalty-penalty.Google Scholar
- (2024) OM forum—The operations of well-being: An operational take on happiness, equity, and sustainability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(2):409–430.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) The measure and mismeasure of fairness. J. Machine Learn. Res. 24(1):1–117.Google Scholar
- (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Frontiers in service science: Integrating ESG measures and supply chain management: Research opportunities in the postpandemic era. Service Sci. 14(1):1–12.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice. Production Oper. Management 31(10):3749–3770.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 22(2):99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling’s duopoly. Econom. Lett. 21(1):67–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Dynamic competition with switching costs. RAND J. Econom. 19(1):123–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) “Un” fair machine learning algorithms. Management Sci. 68(6):4173–4195.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics, vol. 209 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Resource allocation among competing innovators. Management Sci. 68(8):6059–6074.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Fair pricing in financial services. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/discussion/dp18-09.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1996) The business necessity defense in disparate impact discrimination cases. Georgia Law Rev. 30(2):387–430.Google Scholar
- (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2017) A noncooperative approach to cost allocation in joint replenishment. Oper. Res. 65(6):1562–1573.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
- (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Papadimitriou CH, ed. 8th Innovations Theoret. Comput. Sci. Conf. (ITCS 2017), vol. 43 (Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Wadern, Germany).Google Scholar
- (2021) Information sharing on retail platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Delayed impact of fair machine learning. Jennifer D, Andreas K, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML), vol. 80 (PMLR, New York), 3150–3158.Google Scholar
- (2023) A simple way toward fair assortment planning: Algorithms and welfare implications. Preprint, submitted July 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4514495.Google Scholar
- (2023) On fairness and efficiency in nonprofit operations: Dynamic resource allocations. Production Oper. Management 32(6):1778–1792.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50(2):443–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Price-matching guarantees. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):449–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Optimal contract under asymmetric information about fairness. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):305–314.Link, Google Scholar
- (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
- (2014) Re-examining the effects of switching costs. Econom. Theory 57(1):161–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Personalized pricing and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 114(7):2141–2170.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The insurance loyalty penalty: Unfair pricing in the home insurance market. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/wales/about-us/our-work/policy/policy-research-topics/consumer-policy-research/consumer-policy-research/the-insurance-loyalty-penalty-unfair-pricing-in-the-home-insurance-market/.Google Scholar
- (2006) Many-to-one stable matching: Geometry and fairness. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):581–596.Link, Google Scholar
- (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):546–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) A model of market power in customer markets. J. Indust. Econom. 61(4):938–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
- (2015) A short survey on switching costs and dynamic competition. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 32(2):219–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory 34(1):71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- White House (2015) Big data and differential pricing. Accessed April 8, 2023, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/docs/Big_Data_Report_Nonembargo_v2.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2014) Fairness in selling to the newsvendor. Production Oper. Management 23(11):2002–2022.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Regulatory instruments for fair personalized pricing. Laforest F, Troncy R, Simperl E, Agarwal D, Gionis A, Herman I, Médini L, eds. Proc. ACM Web Conf. 2022 (ACM, New York), 4–15.Google Scholar
- (2018) The impact of consumer fairness seeking on distribution channel selection: Direct selling vs. agent selling. Production Oper. Management 27(6):1148–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Information provision and farmer welfare in developing economies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):230–245.Link, Google Scholar

