Private vs. Pooled Transportation: Customer Preference and Design of Green Transport Policy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0569

References

  • Ata B, Barjesteh N, Kumar S (2023) Enhancing equitable access to taxis in NYC through search friction reduction and spatial pricing. Preprint, submitted January 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4324581.Google Scholar
  • Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2011) Lasso methods for Gaussian instrumental variables models. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper 11-14, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Belloni A, Chen D, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C (2012) Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain. Econometrica 80(6):2369–2429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST, Haile P (2016) Identification in differentiated products markets. Annual Rev. Econom. 8:27–52.Google Scholar
  • Brownstone D, Small KA (2005) Valuing time and reliability: Assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 39(4):279–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchholz N (2022) Spatial equilibrium, search frictions and dynamic efficiency in the taxi industry. Rev. Econom. Stud. 89(2):556–591.Google Scholar
  • Chen D, Ignatius J, Sun D, Goh M, Zhan S (2018) Impact of congestion pricing schemes on emissions and temporal shift of freight transport. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 118:77–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi S, Kim D, Ko J, Park J, Ko Y (2023) Value of travel time savings of autonomous vehicle commuters: A segmented valuation for local and inter-city travel. Internat. J. Urban Sci. 27(4):645–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M, Fiszer M-D, Kim BJ (2018) Frustration-based promotions: Field experiments in ride-sharing. Preprint, submitted February 25, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3129717.Google Scholar
  • Cohen M, Fiszer M-D, Ratzon A, Sasson R (2019) Incentivizing commuters to carpool: A large field experiment with Waze. Preprint, submitted September 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458330.Google Scholar
  • Environmental Protection Agency (2022) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2020. EPA Report 430-r-22-003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Feldman P, Li J, Tsai H-T (2022) Welfare implications of congestion pricing: Evidence from SFpark. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. 24(2):1091–1109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M, Gallino S, Li J (2018) Competition-based dynamic pricing in online retailing: A methodology validated with field experiments. Management Sci. 64(6):2496–2514.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guajardo JA, Cohen MA, Kim S-H, Netessine S (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Han L, Zhu C, Wang DZW, Sun H, Tan Z, Meng M (2019) Discrete-time dynamic road congestion pricing under stochastic user optimal principle. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 131:24–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He P, Zheng F, Belavina E, Girotra K (2021) Customer preference and station network in the London bike share system. Management Sci. 67(3):1392–1412.Google Scholar
  • Jiaqi Xu J, Fader PS, Veeraraghavan S (2019) Designing and evaluating dynamic pricing policies for Major League Baseball tickets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(1):121–138.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Management Sci. 66(9):3803–3824.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamble V, Ozbay E (2022) Exploration in markets under local congestion-based pricing. Preprint, submitted March 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4041075.Google Scholar
  • Metz D (2008) The myth of travel time saving. Transportation Rev. 28(3):321–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moon K, Bimpikis K, Mendelson H (2017) Randomized markdowns and online monitoring. Management Sci. 64(3):1271–1290.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A (2000) A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):513–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2018) Carpooling and the economics of self-driving cars. NBER Working Paper 24349, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regional Plan Association (2019) Congestion pricing in NYC. Accessed August 26, 2020, https://rpa.org/work/reports/congestion-pricing-in-nyc.Google Scholar
  • Rennert K, Errickson F, Prest BC, Rennels L, Newell RG, Pizer W, Kingdon C, et al. (2022) Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610(7933):687–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosaia N (2022) Competing platforms and transport equilibrium: Evidence from New York City. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Singh A, Hosanagar K, Gandhi A (2020) Machine learning instrument variables for causal inference. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 835–836.Google Scholar
  • Train K (1978) A validation test of a disaggregate mode choice model. Transportation Res. 12(3):167–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.